NCT04908631

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in combination with home-based auditory training therapy in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Changes in speech perception performance will also be evaluated.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2021

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 1, 2021

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 15, 2023

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 29, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 29, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 22, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 22, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

May 21, 2021

Results QC Date

July 9, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Cochlear Implant

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

  • Number Eligible Patients Who Expressed Interest in the Study

    During the screening period of approximately 6 months

  • Number of Subjects Who Completed tDCS Training

    Measured by total number of subjects enrolled who completed tDCS during auditory training

    up to 7 months

  • Number of Participants Who Demonstrated Competence of tDCS Training

    Measured by provider observation during in-office and tele-visits

    1 month

  • Number of Participants Who Reported Ease of Completing the Training Program

    Number of participants who reported agree or strongly agree as measured by questionnaire, where 1 equals strongly disagree and 5 equals strongly agree.

    1 month

  • Number of Participants Who Reported an Adverse Event

    Measured by daily diary survey completion.

    30 days

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Skin Irritation From Use of tDCS

    Measured by provider visual exam of scalp. Skin tingling/warmth is a known side effect of stimulation.

    6 months

  • Number of Subjects Who Experienced Abnormal Function of Cochlear Implant Device

    Measured by telemetry assessment.

    6 months

  • Speech Perception Performance - Sentence Recognition in Quiet

    Measured by word and sentence lists presented in quiet (AzBio Quiet). Average of two AzBio lists presented in quiet. Range of scores is from 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher speech perception performance.

    Baseline, 1 month, 6 month

  • Speech Perception Performance - Word Recognition Performance

    Measured by 50-item CNC word list. CNC word lists are standardized sets of monosyllabic words used in audiology to assess speech recognition ability, particularly in cochlear implant users. Reported as a percentage (0-100%), with higher values indicating better word recognition.

    Baseline, 1 month, 6 month

  • Communication Function as Measured by Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing (SSQ12) Questionnaire

    The SSQ12 questionnaire is scored as a mean of the 12 items, with a range of 0 to 10. A higher score indicates greater communication function.

    Baseline, 1 month, 6 months

  • Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 Profile (CIQOL35) Questionnaire

    The CIQOL35 raw score is calculated by summing the items for each domain. In this case, the raw score for the Global 10 domain is reported. The range in raw scores is 10-50, where a higher score indicates great quality of life.

    Baseline, 1 month, 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Number of Participants Who Enjoyed Doing the Listening Exercises on the Computer

    1 month

  • Number of Participants Who Reported Use of the Stimulation Device to be Acceptable

    1 month

  • Number of Participants Who Reported Improvement in Hearing Performance

    1 month

  • Number of Participants Who Would Recommend the Training Program

    1 month

  • Number of Participants Who Reported Acceptable Compensation for Study Participation

    1 month

Study Arms (1)

tDCS during auditory training

OTHER

Use of tDCS during completion of the auditory training program

Device: Transcranial Direct StimulationOther: Auditory Training Program

Interventions

Brain stimulation using low-intensity current via electrodes on scalp to modify neuronal excitability in the underlying cortex. The tDCS system has customizable head gear with disposable, snap-in electrodes wihich can be applied at home without assistance.

Also known as: tDCS 1x1 tES mini-CT, developed by Soterix Medical, USA
tDCS during auditory training

Web-based program uses consonant and vowel recognition and understanding sentences/conversations in quiet and in noise using different talkers, and other types of listening exercises.

tDCS during auditory training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \>/= 18 years of age
  • Patients with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant device in use for a minimum of 1 year
  • Sentence recognition scores (AzBio) below 65% and/or word recognition scores (CNC) are below 75% in the implanted ear for \> one year following cochlear implantation.
  • Ability to access internet to conduct computer-based auditory trainings and weekly video visits with study team weeks 2-5

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-English speaking
  • Diagnosis (documented or self-reported) of a psychiatric or neurologic condition, or any other comorbidities that may interfere with the study or increase the level of risk (such as dementia, seizures, legal blindness, brain tumor)
  • Implants, other than CI, above collar bone level that may interact with delivery of tDCS
  • Inability to or unwillingness to use electronic devices/computers, participate in video visits, or make required visits

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Results Point of Contact

Title
Howard W. Francis, MD
Organization
Duke University

Study Officials

  • Howard Francis, MD

    Duke University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2021

First Posted

June 1, 2021

Study Start

March 15, 2023

Primary Completion

July 29, 2024

Study Completion

July 29, 2024

Last Updated

August 22, 2025

Results First Posted

August 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations