Comparing the Performance of a Categorical Loudness Scaling Based Fitting With a Behavioural Fitting in Adults With a Nucleus Cochlear Implant 3 Months Post-activation
CALOS4
Feasibility, Prospective, Within-subject, Interventional Study Comparing the Performance of a Categorical Loudness Scaling Based Fitting With a Behavioural Fitting in Adults With a Nucleus Cochlear Implant in the First 3 Months Post-activation
1 other identifier
interventional
17
3 countries
4
Brief Summary
This study aims to collect data in newly implanted cochlear implant-recipients to inform future development of fitting methods to optimally and efficiently program a cochlear implant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 26, 2025
CompletedApril 17, 2025
June 1, 2024
2 years
December 1, 2022
April 15, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Percentage of correct monosyllabic word scores in quiet (S0) at 50 dB SPL
To determine whether the Loudness Target (LT) MAP provides non-inferior speech understanding in quiet compared to the Behavioural MAP. Percentage of correct monosyllabic word scores in quiet (S0) at 50 dB SPL averaged across the sessions at visit 4 and visit 5. Higher the score better the outcome.
2 days(In booth testing)
Change in Adaptive sentence in noise scores (S0N0 test setup)
To determine whether the Loudness Target (LT) MAP provides non-inferior speech understanding in noise compared to the Behavioural MAP. Adaptive sentence in noise scores (S0N0 test setup) averaged across the sessions at visit 4 and visit 5.
2 days (In booth testing)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12) ratings
4 weeks
Percentage correct monosyllabic word scores in quiet (S0) at 60 dB SPL
One day (in booth testing)
Adaptive Digit Triplet Test (DTT) in noise scores
One day (in clinic testing)
Study Arms (1)
Participants receiving both Categorical Loudness Scaling Based Fitting and behavioural fitting.
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive a categorical loudness scaling based fitting (Interventional) and behavioural fitting with 4 weeks experience of both MAPS
Interventions
The Nexus Research system is used in combination with other devices as part of a hearing implant system. It is intended to create and modify hearing profiles, to monitor the performance of the system and to facilitate Firmware updates of the system. It is also intended to be used with other devices of a hearing implant system to make volume adjustments to the processing unit, to download pre-defined MAPs and to collect data from tests and questionnaires using a compatible device.
The comparator is the commercially available fitting method (i.e., the behavioural measurement of active channels) using Custom Sound Suite (CSS 6.3) software
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 years or older (no upper age limit).
- Post-lingually deafened defined as severe or greater sensorineural hearing loss onset after the age of 2 years as reported by the subject
- Unilaterally implanted with the CI600 Series (CI612, CI622, CI632) or CI500 series (CI512, CI522, CI532) cochlear implant.
- Fluent speaker in the language used to assess speech perception performance, as determined by the investigator.
- Willingness to participate in and comply with all requirements of the protocol.
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Score below 3 on the screening subset of questions from the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire.
- Subject who will be programmed with an acoustic component in the implanted ear.
- Pure tone average (average of unaided thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz) less than or equal to 30 dB HL and aided word score of more than 80% in the contralateral ear.
- Diagnosis of auditory neuropathy.
- Additional health factors, known to the investigator, that would prevent or restrict participation in the evaluations, including significant visual impairment and/or dexterity issues.
- Unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the clinical investigation as determined by the Investigator.
- Investigator site personnel directly affiliated with this study and/or their immediate families: immediate family is defined as a spouse, parent, child, or sibling.
- Cochlear employees or employees of Contract Research Organizations or contractors engaged by Cochlear for the purposes of this investigation.
- Current participation, or participation in another interventional clinical study/trial in the past 30 days, involving an investigational drug or device (unless the other investigation was/is a Cochlear sponsored investigation and determined by the investigator or Sponsor to not impact this investigation). -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cochlearlead
- QbD Clinicalcollaborator
- Avaniacollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Cochlear Americas
Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124, United States
Cochlear Sydney
Sydney, Sydney, 2113, Australia
HEARnet
Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)
Hanover, Hannover, 30625, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anke Plasmans
Cochlear
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Participants are blinded to the order of fitting method. Some participants will use first the Behavioural program followed by the investigational program while the other group will use each of these conditions in the opposite order.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2022
First Posted
February 2, 2023
Study Start
March 14, 2023
Primary Completion
February 26, 2025
Study Completion
February 26, 2025
Last Updated
April 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share