Minimizing Lung Injury During Laparoscopy in Steep Trendelenburg Position
optiPEEP
2 other identifiers
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that the level of PEEP is often suboptimally applied in certain operative conditions, such as in laparoscopy with head down (Trendelenburg) positioning. This can result in excessive levels of lung stress and postoperative pulmonary complications. In patients with steep Trendelenburg and a pneumoperitoneum, the investigators aim to
- 1.measure apical versus basal atelectasis using the lung ultrasound score
- 2.compare lung ultrasound scores at different PEEP levels
- 3.compare respiratory mechanics at the different PEEP levels
- 4.contrast the optimal PEEP level to standard practice
- 5.provide guidance to optimal PEEP titration in this setting for the clinician
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 23, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 23, 2021
CompletedJanuary 26, 2022
January 1, 2022
3 months
September 24, 2020
January 25, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Lung ultrasound score
Lung ultrasound score per level of PEEP (15-10-5-0 cmH2O). The score is dimensionless. A cumulative count is calculated for each level of PEEP by adding the scores from the 6 scanned lung regions together. The lung ultrasound score is a measure of atelectasis.
Perioperatively
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Transpulmonary pressure (cmH2O)
Perioperatively
Driving pressure (cmH2O)
Perioperatively
Dynamic pulmonary compliance (ml/cmH2O)
Perioperatively
P/F ratio (Horowitz index, mmHg / %)
Perioperatively
Dead space
Perioperatively
Study Arms (1)
Decremental PEEP
EXPERIMENTALEvery participant will be exposed to a stepwise decremental PEEP.
Interventions
lung ultrasound to determine the extend of atelectasis. Uses validated lung ultrasound score.
Blood gas analysis to determine arterial oxygen tension
Pressures and volumes will be registered by the Fluxmed respiratory monitor (MBMED, Argentina)
Dead space will be measured non-invasively using volumetric capnography on the FluxMed respiratory monitor (MBMED, Argentina)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg (head-down) position
You may not qualify if:
- smoker
- lung disease (e.g. asthma, COPD, emphysema)
- BMI \> 30 kg/m2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Antwerp University Hospital
Edegem, Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
Related Publications (1)
De Meyer GRA, Morrison SG, Saldien V, Jorens PG, Schepens T. Minimizing Lung Injury During Laparoscopy in Head-Down Tilt: A Physiological Cohort Study. Anesth Analg. 2023 Oct 1;137(4):841-849. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006325. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
PMID: 36729514DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vera Saldien, MD, PhD
Head of the department of anesthesiology
- STUDY CHAIR
Tom Schepens, MD, PhD
Anesthetist/intensivist
- STUDY CHAIR
Gregory De Meyer, MD
Anesthetist in training
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Stuart G Morrison, MD
Staff anesthetist
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2020
First Posted
May 25, 2021
Study Start
June 21, 2021
Primary Completion
September 23, 2021
Study Completion
September 23, 2021
Last Updated
January 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01