NCT04900272

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to design a companion booklet and pilot test it with a voice-controlled intelligent personal assistants (VIPA), like Google Home or Amazon Alexa, to provide homebound older adult patients with skills and tools to help manage social isolation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2020

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 12, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2021

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 15, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 15, 2022

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 20, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 20, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

May 12, 2021

Results QC Date

February 1, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 29, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Social IsolationLonelinessOlder AdultsHomebound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Change in Acceptability

    usability assessment that we adapted from this original source: Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction. Based on: Lund, A.M. (2001) Measuring Usability with the USE Questionnaire. STC Usability SIG Newsletter, 8:2; constructs assessed: usefulness, ease of use, ease of learning, satisfaction. Responses can range from 1 to 7, and scores represent an average of responses so can also range from 1 to 7, with higher scores representing greater acceptability.

    4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

  • Change in Social Isolation

    PROMIS Social Isolation -Short Form 8a: The PROMIS Social Isolation item bank assesses perceptions of being avoided, excluded, detached, disconnected from, or unknown by, others; scores represent T-scores, with a higher score representing higher levels of social isolation. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. In terms of cut points, a T-score of 55-60 represents mild social isolation, 60-70 represents moderate, and \>70 represents severe (https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/promis-score-cut-points).

    baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

  • Change in Anxiety

    General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7): Total score (adding all the numbers) provides a possible score from 0-21, higher scores reflect more anxiety.

    baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

  • Change in Self Efficacy for Managing Social Interactions

    PROMIS Self Efficacy for Managing Social Interactions -Short Form 4a: : Confidence in participating in social activities and getting help when necessary. Managing communication with others about their medical condition, including communication with health professionals. Scores represent T-scores, with higher scores representing higher self-efficacy. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. In terms of cut points, a T-score of 30-40 represents low self-efficacy and \<30 represents very low (https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/promis-score-cut-points).

    baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

  • Change in Companionship

    PROMIS Companionship -Short Form 4a: The PROMIS adult Companionship item bank assesses perceived availability of someone with whom to share enjoyable social activities such as visiting, talking, celebrations, etc. Scores represent T-scores, with higher scores representing higher levels of companionship. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. In terms of cut points, a T-score of 30-40 represents low companionship and \<30 represents very low (https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/promis-score-cut-points).

    baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

  • Change in Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities

    PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities -Short Form 4a: Scores represent T-scores, with higher scores representing a higher perceived ability to participate. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. In terms of cut points, a T-score of 40-45 represents mild difficulty in participating, 30-40 represents moderate, and \<30 represents severe (https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/promis-score-cut-points).

    baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

  • Change in Depression

    Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) - Short Form: scores range from 1 to 15, with higher scores reflecting more depressive symptoms.

    baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

  • Change in Functional Status

    PROMIS-Physical function 8b: PROMIS Physical Function instruments measure self-reported capability rather than actual performance of physical activities. Scores represent T-scores, with higher scores representing higher levels of physical function. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. In terms of cut points, a T-score of 40-45 represents mild physical function concerns, 30-40 represents moderate, and \<30 represents severe (https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/promis-score-cut-points).

    baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

  • Change in Cognitive Function

    Brief Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Scores range from 0 to 22, with higher scores representing higher cognitive function. A score of 18 or higher is considered "normal" cognition.

    baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

  • Change in Well-being

    Neuro-QOL Positive Affect \& Well-Being: Scores represent T-scores, and higher scores indicate better self-reported well-being. T-score of 50 indicates the population mean, with a standard deviation of 10. In terms of cut points, a T-score of 30-40 represents low positive affect and \<30 represents very low (https://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis/promis-score-cut-points).

    baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks

Study Arms (1)

VIPA device and companion booklet

EXPERIMENTAL

For Aim 2, we will recruit a total of 20-40 older adult homebound patients who are likely to be socially isolated, through the Geriatric and General Internal Medicine clinics at Northwestern (over 2,300 homebound older adults) to use the VIPA and accompanying instructional booklet focused on social-isolation. Either the study PI or Research Study Coordinator (RSC) will visit the participant's home, or assist the patient virtually, once consented, to set up the Google Home or Amazon Alexa device for them and review the companion VIPA booklet with them.

Behavioral: VIPA and companion booklet

Interventions

Participants will be asked to use the VIPA and accompanying second iteration of the instructional booklet focused on social-isolation. These participants will be surveyed over the phone for 16 weeks (baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks) with outcomes measured at each time point.

VIPA device and companion booklet

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 65 years or older;
  • Homebound patients of the Northwestern Medicine Geriatrics Program;
  • English-speaking; and
  • Able to verbally consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Condition that limits ability to consent, such as severe cognitive impairment or lack of English proficiency
  • Less than 65 years of age

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Social Isolation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Social BehaviorBehavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Katherine O'Brien
Organization
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Katherine O'Brien

    Northwestern University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2021

First Posted

May 25, 2021

Study Start

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion

July 15, 2022

Study Completion

July 15, 2022

Last Updated

June 20, 2024

Results First Posted

June 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations