NCT04897061

Brief Summary

This is a prospective cohort study designed to investigate the impact of home caregiver support on post-operative convalescence in patients undergoing same day discharge after major urogynecologic surgery. Questionnaires assessing post-operative convalescence will be distributed at several time points after surgery. The main hypothesis is that increased caregiver support in the post-operative period will improve post-operative convalescence of patients undergoing major urogynecologic surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
103

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 18, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 21, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 24, 2021

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 22, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

May 18, 2021

Last Update Submit

November 21, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

ProlapseSame day dischargeCaregiver

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Quality of Recovery 15 (QOR-15)

    Changes in Quality of Recovery 15 (QOR-15) scores based on a priori caregiver characteristics on post-operative days 3, 7, 14 and 28. QOR-15 is a 15 item instrument, full score range from 0 to 150, with higher score indicating better health outcomes.

    Post-operative day 3, 7, 14, and 28

  • Change in Post-discharge Surgical Recovery 13 (PSR-13)

    Changes in Post-discharge Surgical Recovery 13 (PSR-13) scores based on a priori caregiver characteristics on post-operative days 3, 7, 14 and 28.. The PSR scale is a 13 items instrument, full score range from 0-100, with higher score indicating better recovery.

    Post-operative day 3, 7, 14, and 28

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Healthcare utilization composite score

    Post-operative day 3, 7, 14, and 28

Study Arms (1)

Participants undergoing major pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsOnly female patients are eligible to investigate post-operative recovery and convalescence after urogynecologic surgery.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Women age 18 years or older undergoing major pelvic organ prolapse surgery (vaginal apical suspension, laparoscopic or robotic apical suspension, obliterative procedure) or minor prolapse or incontinence procedure with concomitant hysterectomy.

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years or older
  • English speaking
  • Successfully discharged on the day of surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • Discharge to a nursing home, assisted living or rehabilitation facility.
  • Dementia or altered mental status that would make recall of recovery process unreliable.
  • Inability to access Internet or phone for study participation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

New York, New York, 10128, United States

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Berg K, Idvall E, Nilsson U, Arestedt KF, Unosson M. Psychometric evaluation of the post-discharge surgical recovery scale. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Aug;16(4):794-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01197.x. Epub 2010 Jun 14.

    PMID: 20557414BACKGROUND
  • Kleinbeck SV. Self-reported at-home postoperative recovery. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Dec;23(6):461-72. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(200012)23:63.0.CO;2-S.

    PMID: 11130605BACKGROUND
  • Lassen PD, Moeller-Larsen H, DE Nully P. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Nov;91(11):1339-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01535.x. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

    PMID: 22924755BACKGROUND
  • Manohar A, Cheung K, Wu CL, Stierer TS. Burden incurred by patients and their caregivers after outpatient surgery: a prospective observational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1416-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3270-6.

    PMID: 24005979BACKGROUND
  • Myles PS. Measuring quality of recovery in perioperative clinical trials. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):396-401. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000612.

    PMID: 29846193BACKGROUND
  • Wu CL, Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, Fleisher LA. Systematic review and analysis of postdischarge symptoms after outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):994-1003. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200204000-00030. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11964610BACKGROUND
  • Berg K, Kjellgren K, Unosson M, Arestedt K. Postoperative recovery and its association with health-related quality of life among day surgery patients. BMC Nurs. 2012 Nov 13;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-11-24.

    PMID: 23148514BACKGROUND
  • Bouwsma EVA, Anema JR, Vonk Noordegraaf A, de Vet HCW, Huirne JAF. Using patient data to optimize an expert-based guideline on convalescence recommendations after gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0317-8.

    PMID: 29212492BACKGROUND
  • Carpenter JS, Heit M, Chen CX, Stewart R, Hamner J, Rand KL. Validating the Postdischarge Surgical Recovery Scale 13 as a Measure of Perceived Postoperative Recovery After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):86-89. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000352.

    PMID: 28230616BACKGROUND
  • Chazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, Kamming D, Moonesinghe SR. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413.

    PMID: 26787793BACKGROUND
  • Dambi JM, Corten L, Chiwaridzo M, Jack H, Mlambo T, Jelsma J. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the cross-cultural translations and adaptations of the Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale (MSPSS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 May 2;16(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0912-0.

    PMID: 29716589BACKGROUND
  • Evenson M, Payne D, Nygaard I. Recovery at home after major gynecologic surgery: how do our patients fare? Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;119(4):780-4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824bb15e.

    PMID: 22433341BACKGROUND
  • Heit M, Carpenter JS, Chen CX, Stewart R, Hamner J, Rand KL. Predictors of Postdischarge Surgical Recovery Following Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Prospective Cohort Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 May;26(5):320-326. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000599.

    PMID: 29923843BACKGROUND
  • Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

    PMID: 29397134BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ ProlapseProlapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Ann Tran, MD

    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2021

First Posted

May 21, 2021

Study Start

May 24, 2021

Primary Completion

November 1, 2022

Study Completion

November 1, 2022

Last Updated

November 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations