NCT04480671

Brief Summary

This is a randomized controlled surgical trial evaluating the use of a concomitant posterior colporrhaphy and/or perineorrhaphy at the conclusion of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy to narrow enlarged genital hiatuses in a population of women with pelvic organ prolapse. The study's primary outcome is the proportion of women at 6 months postoperatively who still have an enlarged genital hiatus. An exploratory sub-aim (as of October 2021) of the study is to evaluate the levator hiatal area as compared with the genital hiatus by using preoperative and postoperative transperineal ultrasounds. Subjects will be invited to participate, but is not required for study participation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
94

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 26, 2020

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 2, 2023

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 25, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

December 17, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 27, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Enlarged Genital Hiatus at 6 months postoperatively

    Proportion of subjects with enlarged genital hiatus on pelvic exam

    6 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Composite prolapse recurrence

    12 months

  • Subjective prolapse recurrence

    24 months

  • Dyspareunia postoperatively

    6, 12 months postoperatively

  • Sexual Function postoperatively

    6, 12 months postoperatively

  • Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Change

    baseline, 6, 12 months postoperatively

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Sacrocolpopexy

OTHER

This group will only receive the sacrocolpopexy for their pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Procedure: Minimally Invasive SacrocolpopexyOther: Transperineal ultrasound of the Pelvic Floor

Sacrocolpopexy and concomitant level III support procedure

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This randomized group will receive an additional vaginal repair for level III support at the conclusion of the sacrocolpopexy.

Procedure: Level III support procedureProcedure: Minimally Invasive SacrocolpopexyOther: Transperineal ultrasound of the Pelvic Floor

Interventions

A level III support procedure is aimed at repairing the distal support of the vagina with either a posterior colporrhaphy and/or a perineorrhaphy.

Sacrocolpopexy and concomitant level III support procedure

All study participants are planning with their surgeon a minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (robotic or laparoscopic) to repair pelvic organ prolapse.

SacrocolpopexySacrocolpopexy and concomitant level III support procedure

Subjects from either arm will be invited to participate in this exploratory arm of the study. If they choose to participate, they will have a preoperative ultrasound performed and an ultrasound performed at the time of their 6 month visit.

SacrocolpopexySacrocolpopexy and concomitant level III support procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female subjects with pelvic organ prolapse (POP)
  • Planning a surgical repair of POP with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy
  • Preoperative resting genital hiatus measure between 4.0 and 7.5cm

You may not qualify if:

  • \*Note: we will NOT exclude patients based on prior surgical history (including prior posterior colporrhaphy)\*

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Bradley MS, Askew AL, Vaughan MH, Kawasaki A, Visco AG. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):514.e1-514.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.046. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

    PMID: 29425837BACKGROUND
  • Nosti PA, Umoh Andy U, Kane S, White DE, Harvie HS, Lowenstein L, Gutman RE. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):33-7. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000036.

    PMID: 24368486BACKGROUND
  • Siddiqui NY, Geller EJ, Visco AG. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):435.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.035. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

    PMID: 22397900BACKGROUND
  • Vaughan MH, Siddiqui NY, Newcomb LK, Weidner AC, Kawasaki A, Visco AG, Bradley MS. Surgical Alteration of Genital Hiatus Size and Anatomic Failure After Vaginal Vault Suspension. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;131(6):1137-1144. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002593.

    PMID: 29742664BACKGROUND
  • Carter-Brooks CM, Lowder JL, Du AL, Lavelle ES, Giugale LE, Shepherd JP. Restoring Genital Hiatus to Normative Values After Apical Suspension Alone Versus With Level 3 Support Procedures. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 May/Jun;25(3):226-230. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000528.

    PMID: 29210807BACKGROUND
  • Sutkin G, Zyczynski HM, Sridhar A, Jelovsek JE, Rardin CR, Mazloomdoost D, Rahn DD, Nguyen JN, Andy UU, Meyer I, Gantz MG; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):161.e1-161.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

    PMID: 31449806BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Postoperative pelvic exams measuring anatomic recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse will be performed by a qualified examiner masked to the original surgery randomization.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2019

First Posted

July 21, 2020

Study Start

August 26, 2020

Primary Completion

February 2, 2023

Study Completion

July 25, 2024

Last Updated

October 1, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers

Locations