Portable Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Internet-Based Behavioral Therapy for Major Depression Study
PSYLECT
Psychological Interventions and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
2 other identifiers
interventional
210
1 country
2
Brief Summary
First-line treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD), antidepressants and psychotherapy, are associated with refractoriness and discontinuation due to side effects, and logistical burdens, respectively. In this scenario, transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is nowadays considered effective and safe for MDD, albeit with a modest effect size, and also prone to logistical burdens when performed in external facilities. In this regard, clinical investigation involving portable tES (ptES), and the potentiation of ptES with remotely-delivered psychological interventions, have shown positive, but preliminary, results. Here, the investigators present the design and rationale of a single-center, multi-arm, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial with digital features, using ptES (ptES) and internet-based behavioral therapy (iBT) for MDD (PSYLECT). This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and usability of (1) active ptES + active iBT ("double-active"), (2) active ptES + sham iBT ("ptES-only"), and (3) sham ptES + sham iBT ("double-sham"), in adults with MDD, with a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - 17 item version (HDRS-17) score ≥ 17 at baseline, during 6 weeks. No antidepressant washouts will be performed during the trial. Three co-primary hypotheses are presented: changes in HDRS-17 will be greater in (1) "double-active" compared to "ptES-only", (2) "double-active" compared to "double-sham", and (3) "ptES-only" compared to "double-sham". The investigators aim to enroll 210 patients (70 per arm). The results of this trial should also offer new insights regarding the feasibility and scalability of combined ptES and iBT for MDD, in the area of digital mental health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder
Started May 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 21, 2022
CompletedNovember 1, 2022
October 1, 2022
1.4 years
May 10, 2021
October 31, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores (17-item version) between "double active" and "ptES-only"
Clinician-administered depression assessment scale. Score range = 0 - 52 (higher scores mean worse outcome).
Week 0 (baseline) and Week 6.
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores (17-item version) between "double active" and "double-sham"
Clinician-administered depression assessment scale. Score range = 0 - 52 (higher scores mean worse outcome).
Week 0 (baseline) and Week 6.
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores (17-item version) between "ptES-only" and "double-sham"
Clinician-administered depression assessment scale. Score range = 0 - 52 (higher scores mean worse outcome).
Week 0 (baseline) and Week 6.
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores (17-item version)
Weeks 0, 2, 3, 4 and 6.
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores (MADRS)
Weeks 0, 2, 3, 4 and 6.
Change in Beck Depression Inventory - II scores (BDI - II)
Weeks 0, 2, 3, 4 and 6.
Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores (HAM-A)
Weeks 0, 3 and 6.
Change in Clinical Global Impression Rating Scale (Severity of Illness) scores (CGI-S)
Weeks 0 and 6.
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Double-active
EXPERIMENTALActive portable transcranial electrical stimulation (ptES) and active internet-based behavioral therapy (iBT).
ptES-only
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive portable transcranial electrical stimulation (ptES) and sham internet-based behavioral therapy (iBT).
Double-sham
SHAM COMPARATORSham portable transcranial electrical stimulation (ptES) and sham internet-based behavioral therapy (iBT).
Interventions
ptES is delivered by the Flow device (Flow Neuroscience, Malmö, Sweden), consisting of a one-size-fits-all, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) headset with circular electrodes (area = 22.9cm2). The anode is positioned over the left prefrontal cortex, and the cathode over the right prefrontal cortex. Current strength is set at 2mA (current density = 0.087mA/cm2) for 30 minutes, daily for 5 continuous days (with a 2-day pause) for the first 3 weeks, with twice-weekly sessions for the following 3 weeks (total of 21 sessions in 6 weeks). Active iBT consists of a smartphone app with an electronic therapist-avatar. The iBT sessions are delivered concomitantly to the tDCS sessions (the tDCS device connects via bluetooth to the participant's smartphone app).
ptES is delivered by the Flow device (Flow Neuroscience, Malmö, Sweden), consisting of a one-size-fits-all, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) headset with circular electrodes (area = 22.9cm2). The anode is positioned over the left prefrontal cortex, and the cathode over the right prefrontal cortex. Current strength is set at 2mA (current density = 0.087mA/cm2) for 30 minutes, daily for 5 continuous days (with a 2-day pause) for the first 3 weeks, with twice-weekly sessions for the following 3 weeks (total of 21 sessions in 6 weeks). The sham iBT sessions are delivered concomitantly to the active ptES sessions (the ptES device connects via bluetooth to the participant's smartphone app).
Sham ptES for this trial is delivered by the Flow device (Flow Neuroscience, Malmö, Sweden), consisting of a one-size-fits-all transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) headset, with circular electrodes (area = 22.9cm2). The anode is positioned over the left prefrontal cortex, and the cathode over the right prefrontal cortex. The sham protocol consists of a fade-in and fade-out phases of 1mA for 45 seconds, followed by a silent period in between for the remaining 28 1/2 minutes. The sham iBT sessions are delivered concomitantly to the sham ptES sessions (the ptES device connects via bluetooth to the participant's smartphone app).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) per DSM-5 criteria
- Hamilton Rating Scale (17-item version)-HDRS score ≥ 17 at baseline
- Years of education ≥ 8
- Having access to a smartphone with internet access at home
- Treatment refractoriness ≤ 3 antidepressants, at optimal doses and for appropriate duration
- No contraindications for tDCS (i.e., metallic plates on the head, brain devices, cochlear implants, cardiac pacemakers)
- No suicidal ideation with planning, or attempted suicide, in the 4 weeks prior to baseline
You may not qualify if:
- Suspected or confirmed pregnancy
- Lactation
- Severe clinical or neurological conditions, including Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19
- Depressive symptoms better explained by other clinical conditions (i.e., hypothyroidism, anemia) or other psychiatric disorders.
- Use of benzodiazepines \> 10mg diazepam or diazepam-equivalent per day
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Institute of Psychiatry, HC-FMUSP
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Hospital Universitário - USP
São Paulo, 05508000, Brazil
Related Publications (12)
Sathappan AV, Luber BM, Lisanby SH. The Dynamic Duo: Combining noninvasive brain stimulation with cognitive interventions. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 8;89:347-360. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
PMID: 30312634BACKGROUNDBrunoni AR, Moffa AH, Sampaio-Junior B, Borrione L, Moreno ML, Fernandes RA, Veronezi BP, Nogueira BS, Aparicio LVM, Razza LB, Chamorro R, Tort LC, Fraguas R, Lotufo PA, Gattaz WF, Fregni F, Bensenor IM; ELECT-TDCS Investigators. Trial of Electrical Direct-Current Therapy versus Escitalopram for Depression. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 29;376(26):2523-2533. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612999.
PMID: 28657871BACKGROUNDBrunoni AR, Valiengo L, Baccaro A, Zanao TA, de Oliveira JF, Goulart A, Boggio PS, Lotufo PA, Bensenor IM, Fregni F. The sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;70(4):383-91. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.32.
PMID: 23389323BACKGROUNDSegrave RA, Arnold S, Hoy K, Fitzgerald PB. Concurrent cognitive control training augments the antidepressant efficacy of tDCS: a pilot study. Brain Stimul. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.12.008. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
PMID: 24486425BACKGROUNDBrunoni AR, Boggio PS, De Raedt R, Bensenor IM, Lotufo PA, Namur V, Valiengo LC, Vanderhasselt MA. Cognitive control therapy and transcranial direct current stimulation for depression: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2014 Jun;162:43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.026. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
PMID: 24767004BACKGROUNDRazza LB, Afonso Dos Santos L, Borrione L, Bellini H, Branco LC, Cretaz E, Duarte D, Ferrao Y, Galhardoni R, Quevedo J, Simis M, Fregni F, Correll CU, Padberg F, Trevizol A, Daskalakis ZJ, Carvalho AF, Solmi M, Brunoni AR. Appraising the effectiveness of electrical and magnetic brain stimulation techniques in acute major depressive episodes: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Braz J Psychiatry. 2021 Sep-Oct;43(5):514-524. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1169.
PMID: 33111776BACKGROUNDBorrione L, Suen PJC, Razza LB, Santos LAD, Sudbrack-Oliveira P, Brunoni AR. The Flow brain stimulation headset for the treatment of depression: overview of its safety, efficacy and portable design. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Sep;17(9):867-878. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1813565. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
PMID: 32820677BACKGROUNDCharvet LE, Shaw MT, Bikson M, Woods AJ, Knotkova H. Supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home: A guide for clinical research and practice. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):686-693. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
PMID: 32289698BACKGROUNDAlonzo A, Fong J, Ball N, Martin D, Chand N, Loo C. Pilot trial of home-administered transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression. J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 1;252:475-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.041. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
PMID: 31005790BACKGROUNDBrunoni AR, Sampaio-Junior B, Moffa AH, Aparicio LV, Gordon P, Klein I, Rios RM, Razza LB, Loo C, Padberg F, Valiengo L. Noninvasive brain stimulation in psychiatric disorders: a primer. Braz J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;41(1):70-81. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-0018. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
PMID: 30328957BACKGROUNDBorrione L, Cavendish BA, Aparicio LVM, Luethi MS, Goerigk S, Ramos MRF, Moran NKS, Carneiro AM, Valiengo L, Moura DO, de Souza JP, Batista MP, Aparecida da Silva V, Klein I, Suen P, Gallucci-Neto J, Padberg F, Razza LB, Vanderhasselt MA, Lotufo PA, Bensenor IM, Fregni F, Brunoni AR. Home-Use Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of a Major Depressive Episode: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 1;81(4):329-337. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.4948.
PMID: 38170541DERIVEDBorrione L, Cirillo PC, Aparicio LV, Cavendish BA, Valiengo L, Moura DO, de Souza JP, Luethi MS, Klein I, Bariani B, Gallucci-Neto J, Suen P, Padberg F, Goerigk S, Vanderhasselt MA, De Deng Z, O'Shea J, Lotufo PA, Bensenor IM, Brunoni AR. A study protocol for an ongoing multi-arm, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial with digital features, using portable transcranial electrical stimulation and internet-based behavioral therapy for major depression disorders: The PSYLECT study. Expert Rev Neurother. 2022 Jun;22(6):513-523. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2022.2083959. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
PMID: 35642516DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andre R Brunoni, MD, PhD
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The iBT intervention is performed concomitantly to the ptES session, and consists of an app-based interactive protocol (with a chatbot and online videos), synchronized via bluetooth, to the ptES device. For PSYLECT, the chatbot iBT protocol has been translated from English to Portuguese, and all iBT videos are either presented with Portuguese subtitles, or in the case of meditation videos (which allow participants to close their eyes), have been dubbed to Portuguese. Further details about active and sham iBT sessions are not described in this platform to avoid breaking the blinding of future participants enrolled in this study, with means of access to this platform. The complete details will be provided when the study results are published or upon reasonable request.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of the Medical School of the University of Sao Paulo (FMUSP), Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2021
First Posted
May 17, 2021
Study Start
May 22, 2021
Primary Completion
October 21, 2022
Study Completion
October 21, 2022
Last Updated
November 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share