Effectiveness of Two Skeletally Anchored Force Mechanics for Skeletal Class II Correction in Growing Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathism will be recruited and randomly allocated to three equal groups. first group will be treated by pushing orthopedic force mechanics, second group will be treated by pulling orthopedic force mechanics, and third group will be observed for 9 months to detect the natural growth changes. Skeletal changes will be evaluated and the treatment changes will be compared with the natural growth changes. The study hypothesis is that use of direct bimaxillary miniplate anchorage in conjunction with fixed functional appliance (pushing orthopedic force) or closed coil spring (pulling orthopedic force) will induce statistically significant skeletal mandibular growth in comparison to natural mandibular growth changes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 27, 2022
July 1, 2022
1.7 years
April 24, 2021
July 25, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change in the effective mandibular length (Co-Gn)
Correction of the skeletal Class II relation. This outcome will be detected by measuring the mean change in the effective mandibular length (Co-Gn) and position on CBCT images from baseline data (T1) and after appliance removal (T2) and will be compared with the growth changes observed in the control group
at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
change in maxillary length (Co-A)
at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
Changes in the soft tissue angle of convexity
at baseline and after treatment completion about 9 months
patient acceptance of treatment
After treatment completion about 9 months
Study Arms (3)
Miniplates in mandibular symphysis & infrazygomatic
EXPERIMENTALMiniplates in external oblique ridge & anterior maxillary region
ACTIVE COMPARATORGrowing skeletal Class II subjects
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Fixed functional appliance (pushing orthopedic force) in conjunction with direct skeletal anchorage
Coil spring (pulling orthopedic force) in conjunction with direct skeletal anchorage
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Chronological age ranges from 11 years to 13 years.
- Skeletal Class II malocclusion with a deficient mandible (SNB ≤ 76°).
- Horizontal growth pattern (MP/SN ≤ 39°).
- Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with at least 5 mm overjet.
- Mandibular arch crowding less than 5 mm.
- The patients have to be in the prepubertal growth stage (cervical maturational stage 3 or 4) when applying orthopedic force.
- Patients with good oral hygiene, and a healthy periodontal condition.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who underwent previous orthodontic treatment.
- Patients with previous craniofacial surgeries, chronic diseases, syndromes, or growth problems that may affect bone.
- Any signs or symptoms of para-functional habits or previous history of temporomandibular disorders.
- Extracted or missing upper permanent teeth (except for third molars).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry
Alexandria, 21526, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- clinical researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2021
First Posted
May 12, 2021
Study Start
March 8, 2021
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07