NCT04870320

Brief Summary

This clinical trial investigates if certain electronic games may be effective in improving attention and memory function in cancer survivors. Cancer related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is an issue experienced by many cancer patients/survivors. CRCI includes perceived or objective problems with memory, executive function, and attention/concentration. CRCI has a negative impact on survivors' ability to work, carry out routine activities, and engage in social and family relationships. CRCI may result in significant distress and reduced quality of life. Certain electronic games may help improve attention and memory function in cancer survivors and reduce symptoms of CRCI.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 28, 2021

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 3, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

April 28, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 30, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Percentage of participants who completed the study

    Completion is defined as participants who completed all 4 weeks of intervention and final assessment.

    Up to 6 weeks

  • Mean change in scores on the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) over time

    The TOVA records responses to visual or auditory stimuli through the participants iPAD, with a unique, highly accurate +/1 millisecond (ms) microswitch. The TOVA (Copyright 1991- 2021 by The TOVA Company) automatically calculates response time variability (consistency), response time (speed), commissions (impulsivity), and omissions (focus and vigilance). Results are reported as standard scores (average = 100 with a standard deviation of 15) and are compared to a large normative sample stratified by gender and age. Scores above 85 are within normal limits, 80-85 are borderline, and below 80 are not within normal limits. The mean change in scores will be estimated as the norm-based standardized difference in means from enrollment (Week 1) to the last assessment (Week 4).

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Percent change in scores on the TOVA over time

    The TOVA records responses to visual or auditory stimuli through the participants iPAD, with a unique, highly accurate +/1 millisecond (ms) microswitch. The TOVA (Copyright 1991- 2021 by The TOVA Company) automatically calculates response time variability (consistency), response time (speed), commissions (impulsivity), and omissions (focus and vigilance). Results are reported as standard scores (average = 100 with a standard deviation of 15) and are compared to a large normative sample stratified by gender and age. Scores above 85 are within normal limits, 80-85 are borderline, and below 80 are not within normal limits. Will be estimated as the standardized difference between the groups in the percent score change from enrollment (Week 1) to the last assessment (Week 4).

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Mean changes in Adaptive Cognitive Evaluation (ACE)

    The ACE is a mobile cognitive control assessment battery containing standard tests that assess different aspects of cognitive control (attention, working memory, and goal management), modified by incorporating adaptive algorithms, immersive graphics, video tutorials, motivating feedback, and a user-friendly interface. The ACE is administered to all participants via iPad and the scores will be estimated as the standardized difference in means from enrollment (Week 1) to the last assessment (Week 4).

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Percent change in scores on the ACE over time

    The ACE is a mobile cognitive control assessment battery containing standard tests that assess different aspects of cognitive control (attention, working memory, and goal management), modified by incorporating adaptive algorithms, immersive graphics, video tutorials, motivating feedback, and a user-friendly interface. The ACE is administered to all participants via iPad and the scores will be estimated as the standardized difference between the groups in the percent score change from enrollment (Week 1) to the last assessment (Week 4).

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Proportion of time using application

    Adherence rate will be evaluated by comparing the amount of time the participant should have used the application to the actual amount of time the participant used the application.

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Percentage of participants who experienced treatment-related adverse events

    Safety analyses will involve examination of and comparison between groups for the percentage of participants by adverse event severity and type of treatment-related adverse events. Comparisons of the frequencies between groups will be conducted using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

    Up to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in mean severity scores on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D)

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Change in mean severity scores on the Lee Fatigue Scale

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Change in severity scores on the General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS)

    Up to 4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Arm I (Endeavor)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients play Endeavor over 25 minutes daily 5 days a week for 4 weeks.

Behavioral: Endeavor: Computer-Based Cognitive Stimulation InterventionOther: Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires

Arm II (Words!)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients play Words! over 25 minutes daily 5 days a week for 4 weeks.

Behavioral: Words!: Computer-Based Cognitive Stimulation InterventionOther: Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaires

Interventions

Endeavor application will be utilized by participant on iPad

Also known as: Computer-Based Cognitive Stimulation Intervention, Computer-Based General Cognitive Stimulation Intervention
Arm I (Endeavor)

Words! application will be utilized by participant on iPad

Also known as: Computer-Based Cognitive Stimulation Intervention, Computer-Based General Cognitive Stimulation Intervention
Arm II (Words!)

Standardized QOL questionnaire will be administered at each study visit

Arm I (Endeavor)Arm II (Words!)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Attention Function Index (AFI) score of \< 7.5
  • Are able to read, write, and understand English
  • Ability to understand an electronic informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it
  • Have a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score of \>= 50
  • Have access to WiFi connection

You may not qualify if:

  • Receiving active treatment for cancer recurrence
  • Have significant cognitive impairment
  • Have sensory or motor deficits that prevent them from doing the assessment and using the application

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94143, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hematologic Neoplasms

Interventions

Quality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Health StatusDemographyEpidemiologic MeasurementsPublic HealthEnvironment and Public HealthData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Study Officials

  • Christine Miaskowski, RN, PhD

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2021

First Posted

May 3, 2021

Study Start

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion

January 31, 2022

Study Completion

January 31, 2022

Last Updated

April 8, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations