Full Early Atrial Diagnostics in Single Chamber ICD Patients Using the DX Lead and Home Monitoring in Brazil.
SAFE-DX-Home
Simplifying Access to Full Early Atrial Diagnostics in Single Chamber ICD Patients Using the DX Lead and Continuous Home Monitoring in Brazil
1 other identifier
observational
56
1 country
2
Brief Summary
To demonstrate the value and benefits of BIOTRONIK's exclusive DX technology in assessing the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias, mainly atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients with an indication for single chamber ICDs. Effects of the DX technology on related events, such as delivery of therapies and medical management, including eventual complications. Extended benefits offered by DX devices when associated with daily remote monitoring, by means of BIOTRONIK's Home Monitoring Service Center (HMSC).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Nov 2021
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 24, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 9, 2026
CompletedJuly 9, 2026
October 1, 2024
2.7 years
April 28, 2021
November 21, 2025
June 12, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter or Supraventricular Tachycardia Recorded Episodes
All patients enrolled presented with sinus rhythm, confirmed also during the implant. Outcome was considered positive with the occurence of first confirmed episode of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) or supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), detected and transmitted to BIOTRONIK's Home Monitoring Service Center (HMSC), lasting at least 30 seconds to be considered relevant. The adjudication was carried out by the independent investigator in charge of the remote monitoring.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Successful Remote Monitoring Data Transmission to BIOTRONIK's HMSC Platform
12 months
Cardiologic Hospitalization
12 months
Device Related Complication
60 days
Other Outcomes (4)
Cumulative Incidence of Primary Endpoint at 90 Days
90 days
Cumulative Incidence of First AF/AFL/SVT Episode at 90 Days
90 days
Cumulative Incidence of First AF/AFL/SVT Episode at 180 Days
180 days
- +1 more other outcomes
Interventions
The BIOTRONIK DX system offers a single chamber ICD that enables sensing of atrial signals through floating atrial dipoles, using a single ventricular lead. This technology enables enhanced arrhythmia diagnosis based on atrial and ventricular electrograms and, in addition, early diagnosis and automatic transmission of AF and heart failure (HF) diagnostic data. The DX technology provides several features in a single chamber device that are usually only found in dual chamber devices, including atrial diagnostics and SVT discrimination - early detection of SAF, increased diagnostics accuracy, dual-chamber discrimination. Nevertheless, the benefits of a single chamber device are preserved: reduced lead complications, reduced procedure complexity, elimination of costs for atrial lead. The DX system also integrates with BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring, allowing physicians to remotely follow their patients' clinical and device statuses with daily updates.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients requiring an ICD implant
You may qualify if:
- Indication for implanting of a single chamber ICD (primary or secondary prevention) according to current guidelines;
- Sustained sinus rhythm as the current prevalent atrial rhythm;
- Planned de novo implantation with a BIOTRONIK single chamber DX ICD system;
- Patient is able to understand the nature of study and to provide written informed consent;
- Patient is willing and able to perform all follow up visits at the study site;
- Patient is willing and able to use the CardioMessenger and accepts the BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring concept.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- Any limitation to contractual capability;
- Female patients who are pregnant or breast feeding or planning pregnancy during the course of the study;
- Known active malignant disease or recovered from malignant disease within 2 years prior to enrollment;
- Life expectancy \< 2 years;
- Patient is participating in any other interventional clinical investigation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre - Brugada Institute
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90020-090, Brazil
BIOTRONIK Coml Médica LTDA
São Paulo, 01533-000, Brazil
Related Publications (24)
Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, Lau CP, Fain E, Yang S, Bailleul C, Morillo CA, Carlson M, Themeles E, Kaufman ES, Hohnloser SH; ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):120-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105575.
PMID: 22236222BACKGROUNDGlotzer TV, Hellkamp AS, Zimmerman J, Sweeney MO, Yee R, Marinchak R, Cook J, Paraschos A, Love J, Radoslovich G, Lee KL, Lamas GA; MOST Investigators. Atrial high rate episodes detected by pacemaker diagnostics predict death and stroke: report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST). Circulation. 2003 Apr 1;107(12):1614-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000057981.70380.45. Epub 2003 Mar 24.
PMID: 12668495BACKGROUNDPeterson PN, Varosy PD, Heidenreich PA, Wang Y, Dewland TA, Curtis JP, Go AS, Greenlee RT, Magid DJ, Normand SL, Masoudi FA. Association of single- vs dual-chamber ICDs with mortality, readmissions, and complications among patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention. JAMA. 2013 May 15;309(19):2025-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4982.
PMID: 23677314BACKGROUNDMatlock DD, Peterson PN, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Reynolds MR, Varosy PD, Masoudi FA. Variation in use of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from the national cardiovascular data registry. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 23;172(8):634-41; discussion 641. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.394.
PMID: 22529229BACKGROUNDDewland TA, Pellegrini CN, Wang Y, Marcus GM, Keung E, Varosy PD. Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection is associated with increased complication rates and mortality among patients enrolled in the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 30;58(10):1007-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.039.
PMID: 21867834BACKGROUNDDries DL, Exner DV, Gersh BJ, Domanski MJ, Waclawiw MA, Stevenson LW. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Sep;32(3):695-703. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00297-6.
PMID: 9741514BACKGROUNDLee DS, Krahn AD, Healey JS, Birnie D, Crystal E, Dorian P, Simpson CS, Khaykin Y, Cameron D, Janmohamed A, Yee R, Austin PC, Chen Z, Hardy J, Tu JV; Investigators of the Ontario ICD Database. Evaluation of early complications related to De Novo cardioverter defibrillator implantation insights from the Ontario ICD database. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):774-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.029.
PMID: 20170816BACKGROUNDHealey JS, Toff WD, Lamas GA, Andersen HR, Thorpe KE, Ellenbogen KA, Lee KL, Skene AM, Schron EB, Skehan JD, Goldman L, Roberts RS, Camm AJ, Yusuf S, Connolly SJ. Cardiovascular outcomes with atrial-based pacing compared with ventricular pacing: meta-analysis of randomized trials, using individual patient data. Circulation. 2006 Jul 4;114(1):11-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.610303. Epub 2006 Jun 26.
PMID: 16801463BACKGROUNDCastellanos A, Berkovits BV, Castillo CA, Befeler B. Sextapolar catheter electrode for temporary sequential atrioventricular pacing. Cardiovasc Res. 1974 Sep;8(5):712-4. doi: 10.1093/cvr/8.5.712. No abstract available.
PMID: 4434373BACKGROUNDCurry PV, Raper DA. Single lead for permanent physiological cardiac pacing. Lancet. 1978 Oct 7;2(8093):757-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92647-8.
PMID: 80685BACKGROUNDOvsyshcher IE, Crystal E. VDD pacing: under evaluated, undervalued, and underused. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Oct;27(10):1335-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00635.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 15511240BACKGROUNDShurrab M, Elitzur Y, Healey JS, Gula L, Kaoutskaia A, Israel C, Lau C, Crystal E. VDD vs DDD pacemakers: a meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2014 Nov;30(11):1385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.04.035. Epub 2014 May 28.
PMID: 25228132BACKGROUNDGradaus R, Gonska BD, Stellbrink C, Cron T, Tebbenjohanns J, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Himmrich E, Salerno JA, Osswald S, Gommer ED, Van Veen BK, Bocker D. European clinical experience with a dual chamber single pass sensing and pacing defibrillation lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;25(7):1079-86. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01079.x.
PMID: 12164450BACKGROUNDGradaus R, Block M, Dorszewski A, Schriever C, Hammel D, Scheld HH, Borggrefe M, Breithardt G, Bocker D. Implantation of a dual chamber pacing and sensing single pass defibrillation lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Apr;24(4 Pt 1):416-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00416.x.
PMID: 11341077BACKGROUNDNiehaus M, de Sousa M, Klein G, Korte T, Pfeiffer D, Walles T, Raymondos K, Tebbenjohanns J. Chronic experiences with a single lead dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Oct;26(10):1937-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00299.x.
PMID: 14516332BACKGROUNDSafak E, Schmitz D, Konorza T, Wende C, De Ros JO, Schirdewan A; Linox DX Study Investigators. Clinical efficacy and safety of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead with a floating atrial sensing dipole. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;36(8):952-62. doi: 10.1111/pace.12171. Epub 2013 May 21.
PMID: 23692262BACKGROUNDIori M, Giacopelli D, Quartieri F, Bottoni N, Manari A. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator system with floating atrial sensing dipole: a single-center experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;37(10):1265-73. doi: 10.1111/pace.12421. Epub 2014 May 9.
PMID: 24809851BACKGROUNDVermes E, Tardif JC, Bourassa MG, Racine N, Levesque S, White M, Guerra PG, Ducharme A. Enalapril decreases the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: insight from the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trials. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2926-31. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072793.81076.D4. Epub 2003 May 27.
PMID: 12771010BACKGROUNDKolb C, Sturmer M, Sick P, Reif S, Davy JM, Molon G, Schwab JO, Mantovani G, Dan D, Lennerz C, Borri-Brunetto A, Babuty D. Reduced risk for inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks with dual-chamber therapy compared with single-chamber therapy: results of the randomized OPTION study. JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Dec;2(6):611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
PMID: 25282033BACKGROUNDMoss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Klein H, Brown MW, Daubert JP, Estes NA 3rd, Foster E, Greenberg H, Higgins SL, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD, Wilber D, Zareba W; MADIT-CRT Trial Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1329-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906431. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
PMID: 19723701BACKGROUNDHeidbuchel H, Hindricks G, Broadhurst P, Van Erven L, Fernandez-Lozano I, Rivero-Ayerza M, Malinowski K, Marek A, Romero Garrido RF, Loscher S, Beeton I, Garcia E, Cross S, Vijgen J, Koivisto UM, Peinado R, Smala A, Annemans L. EuroEco (European Health Economic Trial on Home Monitoring in ICD Patients): a provider perspective in five European countries on costs and net financial impact of follow-up with or without remote monitoring. Eur Heart J. 2015 Jan 14;36(3):158-69. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu339. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
PMID: 25179766BACKGROUNDDeCicco AE, Finkel JB, Greenspon AJ, Frisch DR. Clinical significance of atrial fibrillation detected by cardiac implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Apr;11(4):719-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
PMID: 24394157RESULTMitacchione G, Curnis A, Celentano E, Rovaris G, Battista A, Marini M, Della Bella P, Santobuono VE, Biffi M, Tomasi L, Baroni M, Bontempi L, Nigro G, Di Lorenzo E, Ruggiero D, Franculli F, Pepi P, Viscusi M, Saporito D, Bertini M, Senatore G, Pedretti S, Pecora D, Forleo GB, Solimene F, Giordano V, Sacchi R, Giacopelli D, Gargaro A, Caravati F. New-Onset Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrial Floating Dipole Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison With Conventional Dual-Chamber Systems. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;36(6):1303-1313. doi: 10.1111/jce.16666. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
PMID: 40176340RESULTHindricks G, Theuns DA, Bar-Lev D, Anguera I, Ayala Paredes FA, Arnold M, Geller JC, Merkely B, Dyrda KM, Perings C, Maglia G, Ploux S, Meyhofer J, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Karjalainen P, Liang Y, Diemberger I, Wranicz JK, Barr C, Quartieri F, Timmel T, Bollmann A. Ability to remotely monitor atrial high-rate episodes using a single-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with a floating atrial sensing dipole. Europace. 2023 May 19;25(5):euad061. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad061.
PMID: 37038759RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. LUCIANO JANNUZZI CARNEIRO, Project Manager
- Organization
- BIOTRONIK Co.Med. LTDA (BRAZIL)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos CK Kalil, M.D., Ph.D.
Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre - Brugada Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 12 Months
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2021
First Posted
May 3, 2021
Study Start
November 24, 2021
Primary Completion
July 31, 2024
Study Completion
July 31, 2025
Last Updated
July 9, 2026
Results First Posted
July 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share