Collaborative Stepped-Care and Productive Ageing Program for Older People With Depressive Symptoms
JCJoyAge2
Evaluation Study of a Collaborative Stepped-Care and Productive Ageing Model for Elderly Mental Wellness in Hong Kong
1 other identifier
interventional
5,239
1 country
43
Brief Summary
The Jockey Club Holistic Support Project for Elderly Mental Wellness (JC JoyAge) has developed and implemented a collaborative stepped care model for older persons at-risk of or with depression in four districts in Hong Kong since 2015 (Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT03593889). Results from JC JoyAge show that the collaborative stepped-care model is effective in improving older persons' mental wellness, and the specialised training and engagement of Peer Supporters are effective in building capacity in the community. The proposed impact extension programme lasts for four years (from 2020 to 2023), and the overall goal is to expand the JC JoyAge model to all 18 districts in Hong Kong, to provide integrated and evidence-based mental health services to older adults with subclinical depressive symptoms, with the hope of model adoption in regular service upon project completion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
43 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2024
CompletedMarch 26, 2025
March 1, 2025
4 years
April 23, 2021
March 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change from Baseline Depression at 12 months
Depression will be measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a 9-item instrument that incorporates depression diagnostic criteria with other leading major depressive symptoms, and rates the frequency of the symptoms that factor into the scoring severity index. PHQ-9 total score ranges from 0 to 27, higher scores indicate higher levels of depression. Change scores of depression will be calculated by subtract the baseline PHQ-9 score from the follow-up PHQ-9 score, and negative results indicates reduction in depression.
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Anxiety at 12 months
Anxiety will be measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), a 7-item scale in which responses to each item are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3. The total score will be used, ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety symptoms. Change scores of anxiety will be calculated by subtract the baseline GAD-7 score from the follow-up GAD-7 score, and negative results indicates reduction in anxiety.
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Loneliness at 12 months
Loneliness will be measured by the UCLA loneliness scale (UCLA-3), a 3-item self-report scale with each item evaluated with scores ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (often). The total score will be used, ranging from 0 to 9. Higher scores indicate greater loneliness. Change scores of loneliness will be calculated by subtract the baseline UCLA-3 score from the follow-up UCLA-3 score, and negative results indicates reduction in loneliness.
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Self-harm Risk at 12 months
Self-harm risk will be assessed using eight items adapted from the Self-Harm Inventory, providing an overall assessment based on total score and clinical judgement. Social service staff assess participants' risk of self-harm (yes or no answers to 10 items) and harm to others (yes or no answers to 4 items). An overall evaluation of suicidal risk score ranges from 0 (No) to 3 (High). The overall evaluation score will be used. Change scores of self-harm risk will be calculated by subtract the baseline overall risk score from the follow-up risk score, and negative results indicates reduction in self-harm risk.
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Service Usage at 12 months
Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) will be used to collect the current types and level of social services which comprise the care package of each participant, and a locally adapted short version would be developed for this purpose. Participants report frequency of usage of different services in the past month when filling the questionnaire, higher frequency indicates more usage of that particular service.
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change from Baseline Daily Activities at 12 months
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Cognition at 12 months
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Social Network at 12 months
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Health-related Quality of Life at 12 months
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Change from Baseline Self-rated Health at 12 months
Baseline and 12-month follow-up
Study Arms (1)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the intervention group will receive a collaborative stepped care programme provided by registered social workers and trained Peer Supporters from aged care service units - the Districts Elderly Community Centres (DECC), and mental health service units - the Integrated Community Centre on Mental Wellness (ICCMW), all are local NGOs. In the collaborative stepped care model (see attachment Table 1), older persons are matched to the intervention module that most suits their current needs. The person does not have to start at the lowest level of intervention to progress to the next level of intervention. Rather, they enter the service with the intervention level aligned to their needs, e.g., level of risks, symptom severity (measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9), and intervention response. Home visits or other format of contact will be delivered by trained Peer Supporters employed by the NGOs to detect and engage hidden cases.
Interventions
Case identification will be done through open referral and outreach activities such as street booth, talks, and home visits. For older adults with mild depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score 5-9), 6-8 weeks of indicated prevention with psychoeducation or low-intensity psychotherapy would be provided by the project social workers in DECC. For participants with moderate depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score 10-14), 6-8 weeks high-intensity clinical intervention, mainly group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), would be provided by project social workers from DECC and ICCMW. For those with moderately severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score 15-19), 8-10 weeks individual CBT or group CBT at higher frequency would be provided by the project social workers from ICCMW. In the progress review when a client is assessed to meet the discharge criteria, a 2-month exit plan involving a Peer Supporter follow-up is invoked.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 60 years or above; and
- have depressive symptoms of mild level or above; and
- able to give informed consent to participate
You may not qualify if:
- known history of autism, intellectual disability, schizophrenia-spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, Parkinson's disease, or dementia; and
- difficulty in communication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Hong Konglead
- Aberdeen Kai-fong Welfare Associationcollaborator
- Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kongcollaborator
- Christian Family Service Centrecollaborator
- Haven of Hope Hospitalcollaborator
- Hong Kong Christian Servicecollaborator
- Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui Lady MacLehose Centrecollaborator
- Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui Welfare Council Limitedcollaborator
- Hong Kong Young Women's Christian Associationcollaborator
- New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Associationcollaborator
- St. James' Settlementcollaborator
- The Hong Kong Society for the Agedcollaborator
- The Mental Health Association of Hong Kongcollaborator
- Neighbourhood Advice-Action Councilcollaborator
- Tung Wah Group of Hospitalscollaborator
Study Sites (43)
Aberdeen Kaifong Welfare Association Services Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Baptist Oi Kwan Social Service Integrated Community Centre for Mental Wellness (Kwai Tsing)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Baptist Oi Kwan Social Service
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Caritas Cheng Shing Fung District Elderly Centre (Sham Shui Po)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Caritas District Elderly Centre - Yuen Long(Tin Chak Centre)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Caritas Wellness Link - North District
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Caritas Wellness Link Tsuen Wan
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Chan Tseng Hsi Kwai Chung District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Christian Family Service Centre (Kwun Tong)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Christian Family Service Centre Wellness Zone - Integrated Community Centre for Mental Wellness
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Chuk Yuen Canon Martin District Elderly Community Centre_Wai Yuen House
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Ellen Li District Elderly Community Centre - Yung Shing Shopping Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Fong Shu Chuen District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
H.K.S.K.H. Lady MacLehose Centre Dr. Lam Chik Suen District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
H.K.S.K.H. Lok Man Alice Kwok Integrated Service Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
H.K.S.K.H. Western District Elderly Community Centre - Integrated Home Care Services Team
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Haven of Hope Christian Service
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Hong Kong Christian Service Bliss District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Jockey Club Wong Chi Keung District Elderly Community Centre - Aberdeen
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Neighbourhood Advice-action Council (Shan King) Community Nursing Services (CNS) Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (Sha Tin)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (Tuen Mun)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (Yau Tsim Mong)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association Islands District
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association The Wellness Centre (Tin Shui Wai)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
S.K.H. Holy Carpenter Church District Elderly Community Centre (Kowloon)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Sage Eastern District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Sage Tsuen Wan District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Shun On District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
St. James' Settlement Central & Western District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
St. James' Settlement Wan Chai District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
The Mental Health Association of Hong Kong Amity Place
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
The Mental Health Association of Hong Kong Tai Po District
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
The Neighbourhood Advice-Action Council
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
The Neighbourhood Advice-Action Counil Tung Chung Intergrated Service Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
The Salvation Army Tai Po Multi-service Centre for Senior Citizens
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
The Society of Rehabilitation and Crime Prevention, Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
The Wellness Centre, New Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (Kwai Chung)
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Tseung Kwan O Aged Care Complex, Jockey Club District Elderly Community Centre cum Day Care Unit
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Tung Wah Group of Hospitals Wilson T.S. Wang District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
TWGHs Lok Hong Integrated Community Centre for Mental Wellness
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Wong Cho Tong District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
YWCA Ming Yue District Elderly Community Centre
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (1)
Wong SMY, Leung DKY, Liu T, Ng ZLY, Wong GHY, Chan WC, Lum TYS. Comorbid anxiety, loneliness, and chronic pain as predictors of intervention outcomes for subclinical depressive symptoms in older adults: evidence from a large community-based study in Hong Kong. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06281-2.
PMID: 39574082DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Terry Lum, PhD
The University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2021
First Posted
April 28, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
June 30, 2024
Last Updated
March 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03