Intrapartum Ultrasound in Predicting Mode of Delivery
The Value of Intrapartum Ultrasound in Predicting Mode of Delivery
1 other identifier
observational
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Determine the value of intrapartum scan measurement(s) in predicting the mode of delivery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2021
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedApril 29, 2021
April 1, 2021
1 year
April 23, 2021
April 27, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The rate of intrapartum Cesarean Section
number of women that failed to progress to normal vaginal delivery and need for intrapartum Cesarean Section (ICS)
3 hours
Interventions
Intrapartum trans-perineal ultrasound in predicting the mode of delivery.
Eligibility Criteria
Women who present to the labour ward in the first stage of labour and willing to participate in the study.
You may qualify if:
- Nulliparous women
- Full Term pregnancy
- Vertex presentation
- Singleton pregnancy
- In labour
You may not qualify if:
- Multiparous women
- Preterm labour
- Non vertex presentation
- Multi-fetal pregnancy
- Planned for elective Cesarean Section
- Underlying medical diseases
- Those unwilling to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Related Publications (4)
Barak O, Levy R, Flidel O, Zaks S, Gillor M, Hagay Z, Vaisbuch E. The Routine Use of Intrapartum Ultrasound in Clinical Decision-Making during the Second Stage of Labor - Does It Have Any Impact on Delivery Outcomes? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(1):9-14. doi: 10.1159/000455847. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
PMID: 28222431RESULTBrunelli E, Del Prete B, Casadio P, Pilu G, Youssef A. The dynamic change of the anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus under Valsalva maneuver at term and labor outcome. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2353-2360. doi: 10.1002/nau.24494. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
PMID: 32865824RESULTSherer DM, Abulafia O. Intrapartum assessment of fetal head engagement: comparison between transvaginal digital and transabdominal ultrasound determinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;21(5):430-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.102.
PMID: 12768551RESULTLipschuetz M, Cohen SM, Lewkowicz AA, Amsalem H, Haj Yahya R, Levitt L, Yagel S. [PROLONGED SECOND STAGE OF LABOR: CAUSES AND OUTCOMES]. Harefuah. 2018 Nov;157(11):685-690. Hebrew.
PMID: 30457229RESULT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator (Obgyn specialist)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2021
First Posted
April 27, 2021
Study Start
May 1, 2021
Primary Completion
May 1, 2022
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04