Comparison of Three Hypoabsortive Surgical Techniques for Treatment of Type IV Morbid Obesity
BAR-3
Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Three Hypoabsortive Techniques for the Treatment of Type IV Obesity: Double-anastomosis Duodenal Switch (DS), Single- Anastomosis Duodenal Switch SADI-S) and One Anastomosis Gastric By-pass (OAGBP)
1 other identifier
interventional
186
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Morbid obesity is the first non-traumatic cause of death in the western population and it is also progressively beginning to affect the developing countries. Bariatric surgery provides better results than pharmacological treatments and lifestyle changes, granting a better control of comorbidities. Duodenal switch (DS) has proben to be the most effective surgical treatment for grade IV morbid obesity and its comorbidities. However, it is not widely used due to its technical complexity and the risk of long-term complications. Single Anastomosis Duodenum-Ileal bypass with Sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) was concieved in 2007 as a one-anastomosis simplification of DS, intended to diminish the surgical time and postoperative risks. Recently, another simplified hypo-absorptive technique has started to be widely used: the one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGBP), also called mini-gastric gypass. It consists of a gastric pouch associated with a gastro-jejunal anastomosis in omega (Billroth II). Despite the potential advantages of these emerging surgical techniques (SADI-S and OAGBP), there is no solid evidence on its efficacy for the treatment of grade IV obesity in comparison with DS. Besides, there is also there is a lack of studies reporting on prospective acid and bile reflux after omega digestive reconstructions, suche as "Billroth II-like" (SADI-S) and "Billroth II" (OAGBP). Bile reflux is potentially premalignant condition. This prospective randomized study aims to compare conventional DS with SADI-S and OAGBP. We include all morbidly obese patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 aged 18 years or more. Exclusion criteria are patients who do not fulfill our preoperative bariatric assessment for surgery and those with contraindications for hypo absorptive or mixed surgery. The main objective of the study is to compare the percentage of excess weight lost at 2 and 5 years after the three different surgical procedures. As a secondary objective, gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) will be compared before and 2 years after surgery, based on GERD symptoms test, gastroscopy and a esophageal pH-impedanciometry in selected patients. Other secondary objectives are comparison of short-term complications, metabolic comorbidities, depositional habit, quality of life and metabolic and nutritional deficiencies at two years of surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 6, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 6, 2023
CompletedDecember 29, 2023
December 1, 2023
2.6 years
April 22, 2021
December 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of excess weight lost (% EWL)
% EWL considering ideal BMI = 25 kg/m2
At 5 years after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Gastroesophageal reflux
2 years after surgery
Postoperative complications
30 days after surgery
Postoperative mortality
90 days after surgery
Metabolic comorbidities
At 5 years of surgery
Quality of life (SF-12 test)
At 2 years of surgery
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Laparoscopic duodenal switch (DS)
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard duodenal switch (double anastomoses). Roux-en-Y reconstruction.
Laparoscopic Single Anastomosis Duodenum-Ileal bypass with Sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S)
ACTIVE COMPARATORSimplified duodenal switch with one anastomosis. Duodeno-ileal omega reconstruction ("Billroth II-like").
Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGBP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGastric bypass of one anastomoses. Gastro-jejunal omega reconstruction (Billroth II).
Interventions
Randomizacion of candidates for either conventional DS, SADI-S or OAGBP.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 and younger than 65 who fulfil bariatric surgery indications
- BMI between 50 and 60 kg / m2
- Patients with a good overall condition to perform a one step surgery
- Signing up of the informed consent for the study
- Patient suitable for laparoscopic surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Previous bariatric surgery
- Two stage surgery
- Medical contraindication for a hypoabsorptive surgery due to previous pathology: inflammatory bowel disease, organ transplantation or candidate for a transplant, previous intestinal resection surgery
- Conversion to laparotomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitary de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907, Spain
Related Publications (3)
Finno P, Osorio J, Garcia-Ruiz-de-Gordejuela A, Casajoana A, Sorribas M, Admella V, Serrano M, Marchesini JB, Ramos AC, Pujol-Gebelli J. Single Versus Double-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch: Single-Site Comparative Cohort Study in 440 Consecutive Patients. Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3309-3316. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04566-5.
PMID: 32240495BACKGROUNDSorribas M, Casajoana A, Sobrino L, Admella V, Osorio J, Pujol-Gebelli J. Experience in biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: results at 2, 5 and 10 years. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Feb 13:S0009-739X(21)00030-0. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.01.008. Online ahead of print. English, Spanish.
PMID: 33593597BACKGROUNDAdmella V, Osorio J, Sorribas M, Sobrino L, Casajoana A, Pujol-Gebelli J. Direct and two-step single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S): Unicentric comparative analysis of 232 cases. Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Aug-Sep;99(7):514-520. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2021.06.017. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
PMID: 34217637BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Javier Osorio
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Javier Osorio, MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2021
First Posted
April 27, 2021
Study Start
April 6, 2021
Primary Completion
November 6, 2023
Study Completion
November 6, 2023
Last Updated
December 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- April 2026 to april 2027
- Access Criteria
- On demand to PI
On demand to IP