NCT04845633

Brief Summary

People with special needs suffer from many difficulties, including mental, physical or motor, which increase the difficulty of obtaining good oral health. Therefore, some adjustments must be made to help these patients maintain oral health. The aim of the current research is to modify the traditional toothbrush grip by manufacturing a Customized Handle of every young child or people with special needs to improve oral health for those patients by relying on themselves with an effectively way.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 9, 2021

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 11, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 15, 2021

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 14, 2021

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 16, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 12, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

August 12, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

April 11, 2021

Results QC Date

May 29, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 20, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Customized Handle ToothbrushDental Primary PreventionDown Syndrome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Clinical Plaque Evaluation of Healthy Children and Down Syndrome of Both Groups at the Baseline

    Plaque scores will be assessed with Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI). Plaque will be detected using plaque disclosing agent. In this index the plaque is evaluated and revealed on the buccal and lingual non-restored surfaces of the teeth on a scale of 0 to 5. Where 0 means no plaque presence which is considered as a perfect state, 1 separated flecks of plaque at the cervical margin, 2 a thin continuous back of plaque (up to 1 mm) at the cervical margin, 3 a band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than one-third of the side of the crown of the tooth, 4 plaque covering at least one-third but less than two-thirds of the side of crown of the tooth and finally 5 is considered as the worst state by plaque covering two-thirds or more of the side of the crown of the tooth. All teeth are assessed. The final outcome is determined by an index of the entire mouth by dividing the total score by the number of surfaces examined.

    Baseline: Pre-brushing

  • Clinical Plaque Evaluation of Healthy Children and Down Syndrome of Both Groups After Brushing

    Plaque scores will be assessed with Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI). Plaque will be detected using plaque disclosing agent. In this index the plaque is evaluated and revealed on the buccal and lingual non-restored surfaces of the teeth on a scale of 0 to 5. Where 0 means no plaque presence which is considered as a perfect state, 1 separated flecks of plaque at the cervical margin, 2 a thin continuous back of plaque (up to 1 mm) at the cervical margin, 3 a band of plaque wider than 1 mm but covering less than one-third of the side of the crown of the tooth, 4 plaque covering at least one-third but less than two-thirds of the side of crown of the tooth and finally 5 is considered as the worst state by plaque covering two-thirds or more of the side of the crown of the tooth. All teeth are assessed. The final outcome is determined by an index of the entire mouth by dividing the total score by the number of surfaces examined.

    Post-brushing

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical Plaque Evaluation of Healthy Children and Down Syndrome of Both Groups After a Week

    1 week

Study Arms (4)

Healthy children using conventional toothbrush

OTHER
Other: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Conventional Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Control in Healthy Children

Healthy children using toothbrush with Customized Handle

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Customized Handle Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Control in Healthy Children

Children with Down syndrome using conventional toothbrush

OTHER
Other: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Conventional Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Control in Children with Down Syndrome

Children with Down syndrome using toothbrush with Customized Handle

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Customized Handle Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Control in Children with Down Syndrome

Interventions

Healthy children will be given conventional toothbrush.Plaque scores in groups will be assess pre-brushing and post-brushing in baseline, a week, and after 3 weeks by using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI) for both buccal and lingual surfaces

Healthy children using conventional toothbrush

Healthy children will be given toothbrush with Customized Handle.Plaque scores in groups will be assess pre-brushing and post-brushing in baseline, a week, and after 3 weeks by using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI) for both buccal and lingual surfaces

Healthy children using toothbrush with Customized Handle

Children with Down syndrome will be given conventional toothbrush.Plaque scores in groups will be assess pre-brushing and post-brushing in baseline, a week, and after 3 week by using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI) for both buccal and lingual surfaces

Children with Down syndrome using conventional toothbrush

Children with Down syndrome will be given toothbrush with Customized Handle.Plaque scores in groups will be assess pre-brushing and post-brushing in baseline, a week, and after 3 weeks by using the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI) for both buccal and lingual surfaces

Children with Down syndrome using toothbrush with Customized Handle

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 9 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Ages between 6-9 years old.
  • Participant must have at least 10 teeth free from dental caries on both buccal and lingual surfaces of the teeth.
  • TMQHPI is at least 2.
  • Cooperative participant (Positive according to Frankel's behavioral rating scale).
  • Parents' consent.
  • Participant with down syndrome must have been diagnosed by specialist.

You may not qualify if:

  • Children undergoing orthodontic treatment.
  • Allergic to any of the toothpaste ingredient used the study.
  • Participant used any toothbrush other than the conventional brush before.
  • Healthy children Participant with systemic diseases
  • Excluding children with Down syndrome who suffer from chronic weakness such as epilepsy or taking medications continuously.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Damascus University

Damascus, 30621, Syria

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Reeson MG, Jepson NJ. Customizing the size of toothbrush handles for patients with restricted hand and finger movement. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jun;87(6):700. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.120840. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12131899BACKGROUND
  • Kammers AC, Zanetti AL, Lacerda TE, Aroca JP, Camilotti V, Mendonca MJ. Toothbrush Handles Individually Adapted for Use by Elderly Patients to Reduce Biofilm on Complete Dentures: A Pilot Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 May;9(5):ZC94-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11261.5975. Epub 2015 May 1.

    PMID: 26155573BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental PlaqueDown Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental DepositsTooth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesIntellectual DisabilityNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAbnormalities, MultipleCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesChromosome DisordersGenetic Diseases, Inborn

Limitations and Caveats

Base line between normal children group and down children group can not be achieved easily, yet it can be compared later after a week and three weeks and give some valuable information.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Line Droubi
Organization
Damascus University

Study Officials

  • Line B Droubi, DDs

    MSc student in Pedodontics, University of Damascus

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mohannad G Laflouf, Phd

    Professor of Pedodontics, Department of Pedodontics, University of Damascus

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2021

First Posted

April 15, 2021

Study Start

April 9, 2021

Primary Completion

May 14, 2021

Study Completion

May 16, 2021

Last Updated

August 12, 2021

Results First Posted

August 12, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations