Fast-track in Minimally Invasive Gynaecology
1 other identifier
interventional
170
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Objective: Evaluate the effects of a fast-track (FT) protocol on costs and postoperative recovery. Design: randomized trial Setting: University Hospitals Population: 170 women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication Methods: A FT protocol included the combination of minimally invasive surgery, analgesia optimization, early oral refeeding and rapid mobilization of patients was compared to a usual care protocol. Main outcomes measure: Primary outcome was costs. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, postoperative morbidity and patient satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2021
CompletedApril 14, 2021
April 1, 2021
5.5 years
March 31, 2021
April 9, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hospital costs and ambulatory costs
The economic evaluation covered hospital inpatient surgical care costs and ambulatory costs. Resource inputs were divided into two main categories: (1) hospital inpatient surgical costs and (2) ambulatory costs further divided into (2a) hospital-related costs (A\&E Department consultations and hospital readmission) and (2b) community costs (community health + social costs and caregiver's loss of production costs). Hospital costs were collected using a computerized hospital information system developed by the University Hospitals of Geneva. The patients recorded community costs in a logbook containing the community health and social invoices and caregivers' number of absent working days. Caregivers' loss of production was extrapolated via Switzerland's median wage per working day.
Up to 1 month postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Hospital length of stay
Up to 1 month postoperative
Postoperative morbidity rate during the first postoperative month
Up to 1 month postoperative
Satisfaction assessed by a three-point likert scale
Up to 1 month postoperative
Study Arms (2)
"FAST TRACK" protocol
ACTIVE COMPARATOR"FAST TRACK" protocol Preoperative evaluation and information Patient general health state optimization proposal prior to hospitalization: Preoperative strategy: * Hospitalization on surgery day * No prolonged fasting Perioperative strategy: * Pain control based on limited systemic opioid therapy use * Anti-nausea prophylaxis * Anaesthesia via IV propofol / remifentanyl * Bladder catheter removal postoperative Postoperative strategy: * Pain control using balanced analgesia * Gum chewing * Early oral refeeding and rapid mobilization * Venflon removal 6 hours post-op
"Conventional setting" protocol
NO INTERVENTION"Conventional setting" protocol Preoperative strategy: * Hospitalization on surgery day * Fasting as of midnight prior to the day of surgery Perioperative strategy: \- Balanced anaesthesia via halogens gases Postoperative strategy: * Same day refeeding and mobilization minimum 6 hours post operation * Bladder catheter and Venflon removal on day 1
Interventions
Preoperative evaluation and information Patient general health state optimization proposal prior to hospitalization: Preoperative strategy: * Hospitalization on surgery day * No prolonged fasting Perioperative strategy: * Pain control based on limited systemic opioid therapy use * Anti-nausea prophylaxis * Anaesthesia via IV propofol / remifentanyl * Bladder catheter removal postoperative Postoperative strategy: * Pain control using balanced analgesia * Gum chewing * Early oral refeeding and rapid mobilization * Venflon removal 6 hours post-op
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication
You may not qualify if:
- the requirement for an additional surgical procedure, such as prolapse repair or urinary incontinence, because a prolonged operative time could compromise early patient discharge and
- the inability to speak French because the patients were required to complete their data collection logbook in French.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
HUG
Geneva, Switzerland
University Hospitals
Geneva, Switzerland
Related Publications (2)
1. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995 Mar 25;345(8952):763-4. 2. Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbølle P, Werner M, Kehlet H. A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg. 2000 Jul;232(1):51-7. 3. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg. 2002 Jun;183(6):630-41. 4. Kehlet H, Büchler MW, Beart RW Jr, Billingham RP, Williamson R. Care after colonic operation--is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):45-54. 5. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005 Jun;24(3):466-77.
RESULTLambat Emery S, Brossard P, Petignat P, Boulvain M, Pluchino N, Dallenbach P, Wenger JM, Savoldelli GL, Rehberg-Klug B, Dubuisson J. Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes. Front Surg. 2021 Nov 11;8:773653. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.773653. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34859043DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shahzia Lambat
HUG
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2021
First Posted
April 9, 2021
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share