Laparoscopic Lens Defogging Using Anti-fog Solution, waRm Saline, and Chlorhexidine Solution
CLEAR
Randomized Comparison of Laparoscopic LEns Defogging Using Anti-fog Solution, waRm Saline, and Chlorhexidine Solution (CLEAR)
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare three popular methods of minimizing or reducing laparoscopic lens fogging (LLF) by heating lens using warm saline, applying anti-fog agent to lens, and rubbing lens with chlorhexidine in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 23, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 28, 2019
August 1, 2019
6 months
February 13, 2018
August 25, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the severity of LLF during the first 3-min operation
The severity of LLF was rated on a scale of 0 (the clearest) to 10 (the foggiest).
At the time of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
the severity of LLF occurred during the remaining operative time except the first 3-min
At the time of surgery
the number of lens cleansing
At the time of surgery
total time to spend for lens cleaning
At the time of surgery
Study Arms (4)
Warm saline group
EXPERIMENTALIn subjects allocated to the warm saline group, a thermos flask, which was filled with heated sterile water, was used. A 1000 ml bottle of sterile water was heated to 60 ˚C in a stove for an hour at minimum. Just before introducing into the abdominal cavity, the laparoscope was placed into the thermos flask for 30 seconds at minimum . After each incidence of laparoscopic lens fogging (LLF), the scope was briefly inserted into the thermos flask about 10 seconds, and was then wrapped gauze around the lens before abdominal reinsertion.
anti-fog agent group
EXPERIMENTALIn the anti-fog agent group, Ultra-Stop TM (Sigmaphrarm, Vienna, Austria), which is a commercial anti-fogging solution containing alcohol, surfactant, and water for medical optical devices, was used. Wiping the lens with gauze soaked in Ultra-Stop TM and allowing the surfactant to act for 5 seconds, the laparoscope was introduced into the abdominal cavity. After each laparoscopic lens fogging (LLF), the scope was removed from the abdomen and cleaned using the same corresponding method.
chlorhexidine group
EXPERIMENTALIn the chlorhexidine group, the lens was wiped with gauze soaked in 4% chlorhexidine detergent solution (Firson, Cheonan, Korea) for 5 seconds before introducing into the abdominal cavity, and chlorhexidine was reapplied on the lens at the occurrence of laparoscopic lens fogging (LLF).
control group
NO INTERVENTIONIn the control group, the lens was not wiped gauze or applied any solution before use of the laparoscope. When occurred the event of each laparoscopic lens fogging (LLF) that splatter of irrigation fluid, blood, and body fluids affected visual clearance, the laparoscopic lens was manually rubbed with clean gauze by a scrub nurse.
Interventions
In subjects allocated to the warm saline group, a thermos flask, which was filled with heated sterile water, was used. A 1000 ml bottle of sterile water was heated to 60 ˚C in a stove for an hour at minimum. Just before introducing into the abdominal cavity, the laparoscope was placed into the thermos flask for 30 seconds at minimum . After each incidence of laparoscopic lens fogging (LLF), the scope was briefly inserted into the thermos flask about 10 seconds, and was then wrapped gauze around the lens before abdominal reinsertion.
In the anti-fog agent group, Ultra-Stop TM (Sigmaphrarm, Vienna, Austria), which is a commercial anti-fogging solution containing alcohol, surfactant, and water for medical optical devices, was used. Wiping the lens with gauze soaked in Ultra-Stop TM and allowing the surfactant to act for 5 seconds, the laparoscope was introduced into the abdominal cavity. After each laparoscopic lens fogging (LLF), the scope was removed from the abdomen and cleaned using the same corresponding method.
In the chlorhexidine group, the lens was wiped with gauze soaked in 4% chlorhexidine detergent solution (Firson, Cheonan, Korea) for 5 seconds before introducing into the abdominal cavity, and chlorhexidine was reapplied on the lens at the occurrence of laparoscopic lens fogging (LLF).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age between 18 and 65 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASAPS) classification I-II
- the absence of pregnancy at the time of surgery
You may not qualify if:
- allergy to chlorhexidine or anti-fog solution
- anticipating cases of abrupt change in intra-abdominal humidity such as hemoperitoneum and profuse ascites
- extremely short or long operative time (\<20 min or \> 180 min) affecting the frequency of LLF
- unavailability of the surgical recording equipment for laparoscopic procedure.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Seoul, 110-746, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Taejong Song, MD PhD
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Allocation information was hidden from the participants and outcome assessor.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2018
First Posted
February 20, 2018
Study Start
April 23, 2018
Primary Completion
October 11, 2018
Study Completion
November 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 28, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share