Clinical Trial of Doxycycline VS BPG for Early Syphilis (SY-DOXY)
SY-DOXY
A Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial of Doxycyline Vs BPG for Early Syphilis
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
7
Brief Summary
According to European and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the recommended treatment for uncomplicated early syphilis in adults (i.e. primary, secondary and early latent) is a single intramuscular injection of 2.4 million units of benzathine benzylpenicillin G (BPG). Recent reviews have also recommended BPG as the first-line treatment of early syphilis, reporting a success rate of more than 90% over a large panel of studies. This form of the drug provides weeks of treponemicidal levels of penicillin in the blood, but does not efficiently cross the blood-brain barrier. However, despite the use of BPG for almost 70 years and its status as the gold standard treatment for early syphilis, the need to administer this antibiotic parenterally has led to the use of second-line oral antibiotics, including firstgeneration macrolides, and then second-generation macrolides, such as azithromycin. Several African studies have shown 1 g azithromycin bid treatment for one day to be effective against early syphilis, but most authors agree that azithromycin should not generally be used as resistance to this macrolide is highly prevalent in Western countries. Moreover, a recent study by our group showed that more than 80% of the treponemal strains isolated in France harbor the mutation conferring resistance to azithromycin. The use of this alternative would, therefore, be highly unlikely to be effective in France. Tetracycline antibiotics have also been proposed as an alternative in patients with a contraindication for BPG or other forms of penicillin. Doxycycline, at a dose of 100 mg orally twice daily for 14 days, has been endorsed as a preferred alternative treatment, but few data are available concerning its efficacy. This issue is crucial, for two main reasons: there has been a recrudescence of early syphilis in most western countries over the last 20 years, increasing the need for BPG, and two periods of BPG shortage were experienced in 2013 and 2017, leading to the use of alternative treatments due to the temporary unavailability of BPG or its limitation to cases in which no other treatment was possible. Data for the manufacturing and distribution of antibiotics are not publicly available, but reports of limited availability, shortages, and price increases for old antibiotics suggest that the current system is too fragile to provide what should be a given in modern medicine: access to effective treatment for common and potentially severe bacterial infections. The recurrence of BPG shortages over the last five years has created an urgent need to demonstrate that doxycycline is safe, or at least as safe as BPG, for treating early syphilis. The investigators hypothesize that the recommended doxycycline regimen is not inferior to BPG and plan to test this hypothesis in a randomized clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Dec 2021
Typical duration for phase_3
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 6, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 23, 2025
CompletedNovember 20, 2025
October 1, 2025
3.6 years
January 29, 2021
November 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Demonstrate, with a high level of evidence, that doxycycline, administered orally at a dose of 100 mg bid for 14 days, is non-inferior to a single intramuscular injection of 2.4 million IU BPG for the treatment of early syphilis
Assessed on the basis of a four-fold decrease in titer in the non-treponemal assay (VDRL or RPR) at month 6 (commonly used to define cure in real-life settings) or a subsequent negative result in the non-treponemal test if the original test gave a results of 1/2 at inclusion.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Evaluate tolerance to the two regimens in terms of severe adverse events (SAEs)
6 months
Evaluate adherence to the doxycycline regimen
6 months
Evaluate the impact of the two regimens on other STDs at month 6
6 months
demonstrate that doxycycline is non-inferior to a single intramuscular injection of BPG in titer in the non-treponemal assay (VDRL or RPR)
3 months
Study Arms (2)
BPG Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORBPG injections will be performed at the participating center
Doxycycline Arm
EXPERIMENTALDispensing of Doxycycline 100 mg is carried out at one time at V0 - Inclusion visit.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years
- Patients who, after the nature of the study has been explained to them, and before any protocol-specific procedures are performed, give informed consent in writing, in accordance with local regulatory requirements
- Patients with or without HIV infection and with syphilis infection in the early stages according to CDC criteria (primary syphilis, secondary syphilis and early latent syphilis of less than one year's duration)
- Patients with a positive non-treponemal assay result
- Patients available for participation and follow-up during the 6 months of the study
- Patients covered by the French health insurance system
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with a history of known hypersensitivity to doxycycline or any other antibiotic of the tetracycline family, BPG (hypersensitivity to the active substance benzathine benzylpenicillin, to other penicillins, to soy phospholipids, peanuts or any of the excipients in the product ; history of severe immediate hypersensitivity reactions (eg anaphylaxis) to other beta-lactams (examples: cephalosporins, carbapenemes or monobactams), lidocaïne (hypersensitivity to lidocaine hydrochloride, amide-linked local anesthetics, or any of the excipients listed in SPC) and / or any of the excipients of the specialties used in the study
- Patients with a negative non-treponemal assay result
- Patients receiving an anticoagulant therapy
- Individuals with contraindications for either of the study drugs
- Individuals treated with retinoids by general route
- Individuals with early and late neurosyphilis
- Individuals requiring doxycycline treatment
- Individuals with late syphilis, whether or not latent (e.g. cutaneous)
- Individuals with thrombocytopenia or coagulation disorders contraindicating intramuscular injections
- Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding, or of childbearing age not using or planning to use acceptable birth control measures;
- Individuals under a measure of legal protection or unable to consent
- Individuals participating in any clinical trial with another investigational product in the 28 days preceding the first study visit or intending to participate in another clinical study at any time during the course of this study.
- Recent exposure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
CHRU Jean Minjoz
Besançon, 25000, France
Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94000, France
Hôpital de la Croix Rousse
Lyon, 69000, France
Hôpital Hotel Dieu
Paris, 75001, France
Hôpital Saint Louis - GeGIDD
Paris, 75009, France
Hôpital Saint Louis - SMIT
Paris, 75009, France
CHU Toulouse - Hôpital de la Grave - GeGIDD
Toulouse, 34000, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicolas DUPIN, PhD & MD
APHP Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2021
First Posted
April 9, 2021
Study Start
December 6, 2021
Primary Completion
July 23, 2025
Study Completion
July 23, 2025
Last Updated
November 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share