Board Games Among Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients Experience (GAME Project)
GAME-Project
Effectiveness on Cognition of a Cognitive Training Intervention Based on Modern Board and Card Games in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
112
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Nowadays, on geriatric centres, cognitive decline used to be prevented by pen and paper exercises (Calero García \& Navarro Gonzalez, 2006). However, as Lampit et al. (2014) suggest, studies based on the efficacy and effectiveness of new cognitive-based interventions in order to improve these cognitive processes are fundamental (Lampit et al., 2014). Cognitive-based interventions are interventions that directly or indirectly try to improve cognitive processes (Chiu et al., 2017). Between the different kinds of cognitive-based interventions, cognitive training permits stablish randomized controlled trials. Cognitive training consists of repeating during a concrete time a standardized set of tasks in order to maintain or improve one or some cognitive processes. Meta-analysis studies have shown that computerized cognitive training can improve in a moderate size some cognitive processes in elderly people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia (Hill et al., 2017) and without those diagnoses (Lampit, Hallock, \& Valenzuela, 2014; Chiu et al., 2017). Although it seems that computerized training is effective, safe and secure, it is important to note the social component of the definition of health (OMS, 1948). Chang, Wray \& Lin (2014) found that social relationships predict the use of leisure activities and this predict a better physical health and wellbeing psychological. In fact, a comparative study found that those elderly people that have played board games have a 15% lower risk of having dementia diagnose and problems related with memory (Dartigues et al., 2013). To sum up, the aim of this research project is to test the effectiveness of a cognitive training based on modern board and card games in elderly people with a diagnose of mild-cognitive impairment in comparison to do cognitive paper and pencil tasks or in a wait-list comparison group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2024
CompletedApril 8, 2021
April 1, 2021
3 years
March 22, 2021
April 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Change in cognitive impairment from baseline to post intervention
Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in visuoconstruction, immediate memory and long-term memory from baseline to post intervention
Copy, draw after 3 and after 25 minuts of Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in verbal long-term memory from baseline to post intervention
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in verbal short-term memory from baseline to post intervention
Digit Memory Test Forward
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in verbal working memory from baseline to post intervention
Digit Memory Test Backward
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in visuospatial short-term memory from baseline to post intervention
Visual Memory Test Forward
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in visuospatial working memory from baseline to post intervention
Visual Memory Test Backward
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in visuospatial processing from baseline to post intervention
Trail Making Test A and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in flexibility from baseline to post intervention
Trail Making Test B and 5 digits test
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in inhibition from baseline to post intervention
5 digits test
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in phonemic and semantic fluency from baseline to post intervention
Animals category and P, M, R letters, Spanish version
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in neuropsychiatric symptoms from baseline to post intervention
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in psychological well-being from baseline to post intervention
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Change in depressive symptoms from baseline to post intervention
Baseline and post intervention (after 16 weeks)
Other Outcomes (3)
Social Status Index and sociodemographical information
Baseline
Cognitive reserve questionnaire
Baseline
Premorbid cognitive function
Baseline
Study Arms (3)
Behavioral: modern board and card games
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will play modern board and card games in groups at medical center 2 times per week for at least 1 hour over a period of 16 weeks.
Behavioral: paper and pencil tasks
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will do cognitive paper and pencil tasks in groups at medical center 2 times per week for at least 1 hour over a period of 16 weeks.
Wait-list
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will be in a wait-list over a period of 16 weeks. Then, they received the board and card games' or paper and pencil tasks' intervention.
Interventions
Modern board and card games group
Paper and pencil tasks group
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participation in cognitive disease center
- Amnestic MCI diagnoses (clinical diagnoses following the guidelines of Petersen et al. 2011)
- Global deterioration scale (GDS) 2-3 values
- Participation assessing outcomes of the caregivers in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Participation in another cognitive training program
- Dementia, neurologic or other disease non-neurodegenerative, which could affect cognitive change over time (medical-reported)
- Severe visual impairment, language impairment or motoric impairment of the upper extremity which significantly affects ability to solve jigsaw puzzles (medical-reported)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Faculty of Education, Psychology and Social Work; University of Lleida
Lleida, 25001, Spain
Cognitive disorders unity, Santa Maria's University Hospital, GSS
Lleida, 25198, Spain
Related Publications (6)
Calero García, M. D., & Navarro Gonzalez, E. (2006). Eficacia de un programa de entrenamiento en memoria en el mantenimiento de ancianos con y sin deterioro cognitivo. Clínica y Salud, 17(2), 187-202.
BACKGROUNDChang PJ, Wray L, Lin Y. Social relationships, leisure activity, and health in older adults. Health Psychol. 2014 Jun;33(6):516-23. doi: 10.1037/hea0000051.
PMID: 24884905BACKGROUNDChiu HL, Chu H, Tsai JC, Liu D, Chen YR, Yang HL, Chou KR. The effect of cognitive-based training for the healthy older people: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2017 May 1;12(5):e0176742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176742. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28459873BACKGROUNDDartigues JF, Foubert-Samier A, Le Goff M, Viltard M, Amieva H, Orgogozo JM, Barberger-Gateau P, Helmer C. Playing board games, cognitive decline and dementia: a French population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 29;3(8):e002998. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002998.
PMID: 23988362BACKGROUNDHill NT, Mowszowski L, Naismith SL, Chadwick VL, Valenzuela M, Lampit A. Computerized Cognitive Training in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;174(4):329-340. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030360. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
PMID: 27838936BACKGROUNDLampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 18;11(11):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756. eCollection 2014 Nov.
PMID: 25405755BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Effectiveness on Cognition of a Cognitive Training Intervention Based on Modern Board and Card Games in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2021
First Posted
April 8, 2021
Study Start
February 16, 2021
Primary Completion
March 1, 2024
Study Completion
March 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04