CE-MRI&CESM in Solid Breast Lesions
1.3 Role of Contrast-enhanced Mammography and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in the Assessment of Solid Breast Lesions
1 other identifier
observational
50
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Our study aimed to assess the accuracy of CE-SM in comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI in the evaluation of solid breast lesions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Apr 2021
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2023
CompletedApril 5, 2021
April 1, 2021
2 years
April 2, 2021
April 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
comparison between accuracy of CESM and CE-MRI in diagnosing breast cancer.
Measurement of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of CESM and CE-MRI in diagnosing breast cancer.
baseline
Interventions
contrast enhanced spectral mammography \&contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
Eligibility Criteria
patients presented clinically with solid breast lesions.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have previously undergone mammography (MG) and ultrasound and have a solid (BIRADs III and more) breast lesion.
You may not qualify if:
- Cystic breast lesions
- BIRADs I and II breast lesions(benign)
- Pregnancy
- History of allergic reaction to iodinated contrast agent
- Renal insufficiency
- Other contraindications to MRI include pacemaker, claustrophobia or metal prosthesis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Zhu X, Huang JM, Zhang K, Xia LJ, Feng L, Yang P, Zhang MY, Xiao W, Lin HX, Yu YH. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Screening Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Oct;18(5):e985-e995. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
PMID: 29983379BACKGROUNDLi L, Roth R, Germaine P, Ren S, Lee M, Hunter K, Tinney E, Liao L. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 Feb;98(2):113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
PMID: 27687829BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2021
First Posted
April 5, 2021
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
April 1, 2023
Study Completion
May 1, 2023
Last Updated
April 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04