Bone Formation Maxillary Sinus Width
Comparison of Bone Formation According to Different Maxillary Sinus Width: a Multicenter Prospective Study.
1 other identifier
observational
16
1 country
3
Brief Summary
According to previous scientific evidence lining on biological concept of bone regeneration into the maxillary sinus, an observational study was set up to record possible (hypothesized) difference in bone formation between different width of the maxillary sinus itself. Therefore, a multicenter study was set up that foresaw a surgical intervention of sinus lift with lateral approach, the 6 months healing phase, the implant insertion in two sites with the implant site preparation made by a trephine bur to retrieve a bone specimen for histomorphometric examination without any additive invasively for the patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 5, 2021
CompletedApril 5, 2021
April 1, 2021
3 years
March 25, 2021
April 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
quantity (%) of newly formed bone
quantity (%) of newly formed bone (NFB) in histomorphometric analysis
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
quantity (%) of graft
6 months
quantity of complications
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Large sinus
same patient, sinus width \> 12mm measured at 10mm from the alveolar crest at the planned implant site
narrow sinus
same patient, sinus width \< 12mm measured at 10mm from the alveolar crest at the planned implant site
Interventions
sinus floor elevation with lateral approach. 6 months healing phase. implant site preparation with trephine bur and bone specimen retrieval.
Eligibility Criteria
Any patient with Kennedy class II partial edentulism (Kennedy 1928) requiring unilateral sinus floor elevation for the placement of two not adjacent dental implants supporting a fixed partial prosthesis was eligible for entering this study
You may qualify if:
- height of the residual bone crest \<5 mm in both sites where implant placement was planned;
- age \>18 years;
- written informed consent given.
You may not qualify if:
- general contraindications to implant surgery
- smokers
- uncontrolled diabetes (HBA1c \> 7.5%)
- treated or under treatment with intravenous antiresorptive drugs
- allergy to bovine collagen
- immunosuppressed
- irradiated in the head and neck area
- pregnant or breastfeeding
- substance abusers
- psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
- patient not fully able to comply with the study protocol.
- maxillary sinus conditions contraindicating sinus floor elevation
- poor oral hygiene and motivation (FMPS \>25 and or FMBS\>20)
- Schneiderian membrane perforation during surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Hesire
Cassano Allo Ionio, CS, 87011, Italy
Studio
Gorizia, GO, 34170, Italy
Studio B
Verona, VR, 37045, Italy
Related Publications (4)
Stacchi C, Spinato S, Lombardi T, Bernardello F, Bertoldi C, Zaffe D, Nevins M. Minimally Invasive Management of Implant-Supported Rehabilitation in the Posterior Maxilla, Part I. Sinus Floor Elevation: Biologic Principles and Materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):e85-e93. doi: 10.11607/prd.4497.
PMID: 32233183RESULTStacchi C, Spinato S, Lombardi T, Bernardello F, Bertoldi C, Zaffe D, Nevins M. Minimally Invasive Management of Implant-Supported Rehabilitation in the Posterior Maxilla, Part II. Surgical Techniques and Decision Tree. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):e95-e102. doi: 10.11607/prd.4498.
PMID: 32233185RESULTStacchi C, Vercellotti T, Toschetti A, Speroni S, Salgarello S, Di Lenarda R. Intraoperative complications during sinus floor elevation using two different ultrasonic approaches: a two-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jan;17 Suppl 1:e117-25. doi: 10.1111/cid.12136. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
PMID: 23968289RESULTAvila G, Wang HL, Galindo-Moreno P, Misch CE, Bagramian RA, Rudek I, Benavides E, Moreno-Riestra I, Braun T, Neiva R. The influence of the bucco-palatal distance on sinus augmentation outcomes. J Periodontol. 2010 Jul;81(7):1041-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090686.
PMID: 20450402RESULT
Biospecimen
alveolar bone specimen containing native bone, regenerated bone (with residual graft particles); the specimens were retrieved with a trephine bur that prepared the same time the implant site.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claudio Stacchi, Dr.
Piezoelectricsurgery Academy
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2021
First Posted
April 5, 2021
Study Start
March 15, 2017
Primary Completion
March 15, 2020
Study Completion
March 15, 2021
Last Updated
April 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
data will be shared after data managing and statistics