Evaluation of Socket Shield Technique With Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone

NCT05409950 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: HR-1
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 20
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The study was conducted on 20 immediate implant placement sites in the anterior maxillary region. In the study group, 10 implants were inserted using socket shield technique, while in control group, 10 implants were inserted using conventional immediate placement technique. All patients received immediate and 6 months post-operative CBCT to assess horizontal bone loss, vertical bone loss, and measurement of bone density. Implant stability quotients (ISQs) was measured immediately, 1st, 3rd and 6 months post-operatively.

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Resorption

Keywords

Immediate implants, sockets shield technique, esthetic zone

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (14)

• Implant stability

  Using osstell

  immediate postoperative

• Implant stability

  Using osstell

  one month post-operative

• Implant stability

  Using osstell

  three month post-operative

• Implant stability

  Using osstell

  six month post-operative

• Horizontal gap

  Using cone-beam computed tomography

  immediate postoperative

• Horizontal gap

  Using cone-beam computed tomography

  six month post-operative

• Vertical bone loss

  Using cone-beam computed tomography

  immediate postoperative

• Vertical bone loss

  Using cone-beam computed tomography

  six month post-operative

• Bone density

  Using cone-beam computed tomography

  immediate postoperative

• Bone density

  Using cone-beam computed tomography

  six month post-operative

• peri-implant probing depth

  using periodontal probe

  immediate postoperative

• peri-implant probing depth

  using periodontal probe

  one month post-operative

• peri-implant probing depth

  using periodontal probe

  three month post-operative

• peri-implant probing depth

  using periodontal probe

  six month post-operative

Study Arms (2)

Study group: implants were inserted using socket shield technique at the esthetic zone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure: Immediate implant placement using socket shield technique

Control group: implants were inserted using conventional immediate technique

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

Immediate implant placement using socket shield technique PROCEDURE

Evaluation of socket shield technique with immediate implant placement at the esthetic zone in comparison with the conventional immediate implant placement

Study group: implants were inserted using socket shield technique at the esthetic zone

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 21 Years - 65 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Endodontic or non-endodontic treated un-restorable remaining root/ tooth related to maxillary anterior teeth.
• Healthy adult patients \> 20 years old (ASAI, II) .
• Adequate oral hygiene.
• Intact periodontal tissues.

You may not qualify if:

• Periapical or periodontal active infection involving the teeth/root to be extracted (as excluded by radiographic examination).
• Medically compromised patients (ASA III, IV, V).
• Patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
• Heavy smokers,alcohol or drug abuse.
• Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism, clenching, excessive gum chewing, lip or fingernail biting.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Egyptian Russian University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Suez canal university

Ismailia, Egypt

Location

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: NETWORK
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 24, 2022
• First Posted: June 8, 2022
• Study Start: September 16, 2019
• Primary Completion: January 6, 2021
• Study Completion: September 7, 2021
• Last Updated: June 8, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Locations

EG (1)