A Cognitive Bias Modification RCT for Aggression
Attention and Interpretation Bias Modification for Aggression Difficulties
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial will test a computerized cognitive bias modification program (CBM) to treat attention and interpretive biases in patients with primary aggression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2023
CompletedMarch 26, 2021
March 1, 2021
2 years
March 5, 2021
March 25, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in a Aggression from pretreatment to end of treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up
Overt Aggression Scale-Modified (higher score means more aggression)
preatment, post-treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up. Total of 2 months
Change in a Anger from pretreatment to end of treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up
State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2:state anger scale modified(higher score means more anger)
pretreatment, posttreatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up. Total of 2 months
Change in Social Information Processing from pretreatment to end of treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up
Social Information Processing - Attribution and Emotional Response Questionnaire
pretreatment, posttreatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up. Total of 2 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Emotion Regulation from pretreatment to end of treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up
pretreatment, posttreatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up. Total of 2 months
Change in IED diagnosis from pretreatment to end of treatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up
pretreatment, posttreatment (4 weeks later) and 1-month follow-up. Total of 2 months
Study Arms (2)
Bias Modification
EXPERIMENTALAttention (ATT) and interpretation (ITT) bias training. Participants complete the ATT and ITT tasks twice per week for four weeks. The ATT trains attention toward neutral stimuli and away from negative stimuli. On trials with one neutral and one threat word, the probe will always follow the location of the neutral word. Therefore, there is a contingency between the valence of the word and the location of the probe. Participants will be asked to indicate which type of probe had appeared in each trial by pressing a corresponding button as rapidly and accurately as possible. The ITT trains participants to make benign (vs. threatening) interpretations of socially-ambiguous scenarios. For each trial, a word suggesting a socially threatening or benign interpretation is presented then replaced by a sentence describing a socially-ambiguous scenario. Participants indicate if they thought the word and sentence were related. Participants will receive corrective feedback after each trial.
Control Condition
PLACEBO COMPARATORA combination of attention (ATT-C) and interpretation (ITT-C) control tasks These tasks are identical to the experimental tasks (ATT and ITT) with the exceptions that: ATT-C: It is designed to train attention toward neither neutral nor the threat stimuli. This will be achieved by having an equal number of probes follow the location of the threatening word and the neutral word. ITT-C: It is not designed to train benign interpretations of ambiguous social scenarios. Thus, no feedback will be given during the inter-trial interval, rather participants will see a blank screen between trials. Participants will complete both the ATT-C and ITT-C tasks twice per week for four weeks, totaling to eight experimental sessions.
Interventions
A four-week computerized attentional and interpretive bias modification protocol in which participants complete both ATT and ITT tasks twice per week, totaling to eight experimental sessions (see experimental arm for more detail.)
A four-week computerized attentional and interpretive stimuli protocol in which participants complete both ATT-C and ITT-C tasks twice per week, totaling to eight control sessions (see placebo control arm for more detail.)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Meet DSM-5 criteria for current IED, as assessed via phone screen and confirmed during an in-person diagnostic interview conducted during visit one of the study
- Are able and willing to cooperate with study protocol; i.e. keep appointments, read and understand consent form, etc.
- Have written and verbal English proficiency for understanding consent and study materials
You may not qualify if:
- Have a lifetime history of psychosis
- Have current moderate to severe substance use disorder
- Have a history of bipolar disorder
- Have current major depressive disorder
- Are younger than 18 or older than 55 years old
- Are currently (past month) receiving treatment for anger or aggression
- Recently (past month) started or changed psychotropic medications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Temple University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19122, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants in the control condition will see the same stimuli with a different contingency for correct vs incorrect response on the computerized training task (participant masking) Outcome assessors will not be involved in administration of the intervention and will not be informed of participant condition (outcomes assessor masking)
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2021
First Posted
March 26, 2021
Study Start
May 1, 2021
Primary Completion
May 1, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2023
Last Updated
March 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03