Mulligan Mobilization With Movement Versus Macquarie Injury Management Group in Function and Pain of Knee Osteoarthritis
Long Term Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement Versus Macquarie Injury Management Group on Function and Pain of Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Knee pain is one of the most usual pain that commonly affects people especially in the late age. It can be caused by osteoarthritis, poor posture or sitting position, bad bending or improper lifting. It is usually not caused by a serious illness. It is the most common cause of disability. To compare the long term effects of Mulligan Mobilization with Movement versus Macquarie Injury Management Group on pain and function of knee osteoarthritis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Apr 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2021
CompletedSeptember 2, 2021
August 1, 2021
8 months
March 25, 2021
August 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analogue scale
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
6 months
WOMAC
The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. Usually a sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a total WOMAC score, however there are other methods that have been used to combine scores.
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Macquarie Injury Management group
EXPERIMENTALMulligan Mobilization with Movement
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Group A was treated by MIMG (soft tissue mobilization) with base line treatment (Hot pack for 10 mint, Quadriceps Isometrics, Stretching). For the application of technique subject lies supine with extended knee, therapist places both hands on the knee and gently apply soft tissue release. This procedure was applied for 2 to 3 minutes.
Group B was treated by Mulligan Mobilization with movement with base line treatment (Hot Pack for 10 mints, Quadriceps Isometrics, Stretching). For the application of technique subject lies supine with 30 degree knee flexion, therapist places right hand below the knee and left hand above the knee. Apply the lateral glide on the joint. This procedure was applied for 3 times.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ACR criteria for knee will be over age 50
- less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness,
- Crepitus on active motion,
- Tenderness
- Enlargement
- No palpable warmth of synovium.
- Osteoarthritis grade 1 and 2 by Kelly-green and Lawrence method.
You may not qualify if:
- Any surgical procedure done in past 6 months and metal implants in lower extremity.
- Any infection and neoplastic disorder.
- Post traumatic knee stiffness.
- Secondary knee O A peripheral vascular disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riphah Rehabilitation Center
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Related Publications (6)
Kandada S, Heggannavar A. Effect of Mulligan's MWM versus Macquarie Injury Management Group (MIMG) protocol on pain and function in osteoarthritis of knee: a randomised clinical trial. IJTRR. 2015;4(4):125-31.
BACKGROUNDBhatia D, Bejarano T, Novo M. Current interventions in the management of knee osteoarthritis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):30-8. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.106561.
PMID: 23559821BACKGROUNDFelson DT. The epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis: results from the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Dec;20(3 Suppl 1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(90)90046-i.
PMID: 2287948BACKGROUNDFelson DT, Gale DR, Elon Gale M, Niu J, Hunter DJ, Goggins J, Lavalley MP. Osteophytes and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jan;44(1):100-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh411. Epub 2004 Sep 20.
PMID: 15381791BACKGROUNDCooper C, McAlindon T, Coggon D, Egger P, Dieppe P. Occupational activity and osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994 Feb;53(2):90-3. doi: 10.1136/ard.53.2.90.
PMID: 8129467BACKGROUNDAlshami AM. Knee osteoarthritis related pain: a narrative review of diagnosis and treatment. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2014 Jan;8(1):85-104. doi: 10.12816/0006075.
PMID: 24899883BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maryam Shabbir
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2021
First Posted
March 26, 2021
Study Start
April 1, 2020
Primary Completion
November 30, 2020
Study Completion
December 30, 2020
Last Updated
September 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share