Educational Interventions on Diabetic Foot Care
Impact of Educational Interventions on Diabetic Foot Self-care: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
71
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Diabetes mellitus currently affects 463 million people worldwide. One of the most serious complications of diabetes is the diabetic foot. Adequate foot care behaviours reduce the risk of ulcers, infections, and amputations, and improve the quality of life, in these patients. This Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial aims to analyse the impact of different educational strategies - an instructive video (Video Watching Group - Experimental Group 1) compared with a leaflet on foot care with real-time guided reading (Real-Time Leaflet Reading Group - Experimental Group 2) and with standard teaching on diabetic foot care (Standard Care - Control Group) - on adherence and knowledge regarding diabetic foot care, as well as on patient's perception of their foot health. Participants will be assessed at the first consultation of the diabetic foot (T0), about two weeks after the first assessment (T1), and three months after the T0 in a follow-up assessment (T2), with T1 and T2 being performed through telephone calls, after obtaining the patients' consent. The results of the present study will inform educational interventions regarding foot care adherence in patients with diabetic foot, in order to decrease the likelihood of developing diabetic foot ulcers and, consequently, to reduce amputation rates and the several associated costs, contributing to improving patients' quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
Started Mar 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedMay 19, 2022
May 1, 2022
9 months
March 14, 2021
May 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Adherence to the diabetic foot care behaviours
Adherence to foot care behaviors will be assessed through the Nottingham Assessment of Functional Foot Care (Lincoln, Jeffcoate, Ince, Smith, \& Radford, 2007). Composed of 29 items whose answers are given on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3. Higher scores correspond to a higher frequency of foot care behaviors.
Changes from baseline to two weeks post-test and after a three month follow-up
Adherence to the diabetic foot care behaviours
The level of foot self-care (indirect measure of adherence) will be assessed through the subscale of Foot Care of the Summary Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire (Original Version by Toobert, Hampson, \& Glasgow, 2000; Portuguese Version by Bastos, Severo, \& Lopes, 2007). Composed of 3 items in which patients are asked how many of the last seven days did they perform the respective foot care behaviour. Therefore, answers are given on a scale between 0 and 7, and its score is calculated through the mean number of days. Higher scores indicate higher levels of foot self-care.
Changes from baseline to two weeks post-test and after a three month follow-up
Knowledge on foot care
Knowledge on foot care will be assessed through the Questionnaire on Knowledge of Foot Care (Hasnain \& Sheikh, 2009). Each correct answer is scored with 1 point and higher scores indicate better knowledge about foot care.
Changes from baseline to two weeks post-test and after a three month follow-up
General foot health
General foot health will be assessed through the respective subscale of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ; Bennett, Patterson, Wearing, \& Baglioni, 1998). Scores are transformed into a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 corresponds to the perception of poor foot health state/condition and 100 to the perception of excellent foot health.
Changes from baseline to two weeks post-test and after a three month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Representations about diabetic foot
Changes from baseline to two weeks post-test and after a three month follow-up
Other Outcomes (6)
Foot pain
Baseline (T0), two weeks post-test (T1), three months follow-up (T2)
Foot function
Baseline (T0), two weeks post-test (T1), three months follow-up (T2)
Footwear
Baseline (T0), two weeks post-test (T1), three months follow-up (T2)
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Video Watching Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will watch an instructive video on diabetic foot care and will receive face-to-face teaching on diabetic foot care.
Real-time Leaflet Reading Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive a leaflet with diabetic foot care information, whose reading will be guided in real-time by the Researcher, and will also receive face-to-face teaching on diabetic foot care.
Standard Care Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive the standard care that includes face-to-face teaching about diabetic foot care and will take a leaflet on diabetic foot care to read at home.
Interventions
In the video, the diabetic foot care is presented verbally and appropriately captioned, as well as exemplified by real patients and health professionals from the hospital
The leaflet has information about diabetic foot care. Researcher will guide its reading with patients.
Patients receive a leaflet about diabetic foot care to read at home.
Face-to-face teaching includes the teaching about diabetic foot care during the consultation by health professionals.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of Diabetes mellitus;
- Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot;
- To benefit from the first assessment and follow-up at the Multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Consultation of the hospitals where data collection will take place.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of clinical dementia described in the patient's clinical record;
- Cognitive disability to answer the questionnaires;
- Severe visual and/or hearing impairment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Clínica do Pé Diabético, Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa
Penafiel, Porto District, 4564-007, Portugal
Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto
Porto, 4099-001, Portugal
Related Publications (8)
Bastos F, Severo M, Lopes C. [Psychometric analysis of diabetes self-care scale (translated and adapted to Portuguese)]. Acta Med Port. 2007 Jan-Feb;20(1):11-20. Epub 2007 May 23. Portuguese.
PMID: 17624279BACKGROUNDBennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T. Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998 Sep;88(9):419-28. doi: 10.7547/87507315-88-9-419.
PMID: 9770933BACKGROUNDFigueiras M, Marcelino DS, Claudino A, Cortes MA, Maroco J, Weinman J. Patients' illness schemata of hypertension: the role of beliefs for the choice of treatment. Psychol Health. 2010 Apr;25(4):507-17. doi: 10.1080/08870440802578961.
PMID: 20204931BACKGROUNDHasnain S, Sheikh NH. Knowledge and practices regarding foot care in diabetic patients visiting diabetic clinic in Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Oct;59(10):687-90.
PMID: 19813683BACKGROUNDLincoln, N. B., Jeffcoate, W. J., Ince, P., Smith, M., & Radford, K. A. (2007). Validation of a new measure of protective footcare behaviour: the Nottingham Assessment of Functional Footcare (NAFF). Practical Diabetes International, 24, 207-211. doi:10.1002/pdi.1099
BACKGROUNDPaiva D, Silva S, Severo M, Ferreira P, Santos O, Lunet N, Azevedo A. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the health literacy assessment tool METER in the Portuguese adult population. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Nov;97(2):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.024. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
PMID: 25107513BACKGROUNDPandis N. Randomization. Part 3: allocation concealment and randomization implementation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jan;141(1):126-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.09.003. No abstract available.
PMID: 22196195BACKGROUNDToobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):943-50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943.
PMID: 10895844BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gabriela Ferreira, Master
School of Psychology, University of Minho
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Randomisation will be performed through an online random number generator, by a researcher external to the team of this study, to ensure the concealment of the allocation of participants by the several groups (Pandis, 2012). It will not be possible to conceal the group to which the patient was allocated to the medical and nursing team, since they have to administer the intervention or the researcher who will have to inform the respective team and administer the intervention in the Reading Group. Only the participants will be blind to the group to which they have been allocated.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Master
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2021
First Posted
March 23, 2021
Study Start
March 8, 2021
Primary Completion
December 15, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
May 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share