NCT04698720

Brief Summary

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are one of the most serious complications of diabetes and can lead to amputations in 85% of cases, resulting in physical, psychological, family, social and economic consequences. Research suggests that psychological factors may play an important role in DFU healing. Relaxation and hypnosis seem to contribute to faster wound healing. More research is needed to assess the effectiveness of different types of intervention on different types of wounds, in particular chronic wounds such as DFU. This study will evaluate the efficacy of relaxation and hypnosis, both with guided imagery, in DFU healing, physiological indicators (inflammatory, metabolic, oxidative stress, angiogenic, and miRNA biomarkers) of wound healing prognosis, and QoL, in patients with diabetic foot and a chronic ulcer. This study is a Randomized Controlled Study of a Psychological Intervention that aims to evaluate the efficiency of a muscle relaxation intervention with guided imagery (experimental group - EG1) compare to a hypnosis intervention with guided imagery (experimental group - EG2) and a neutral guided imagery placebo (active control group - ACG) and a group that does not receive any psychological intervention (passive control group - PCG). This study will also examine, qualitatively, the perspectives of patients with DFU on the relaxation and hypnosis interventions, in order to check its effectiveness; as well as the perspectives of informal caregivers on this adjuvant therapys. Participants must have a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Foot; one or two chronic active ulcers at the time of assessment; and clinical levels of stress or anxiety or depression. Participants will be randomized by the four conditions - EG1, EG2, ACG and PCG - and assessed on the day of the first consultation or nursing treatment for chronic DFU (T0), two months later (T1), and six months later (T2; follow-up). Two weeks after T1, an interview will be conducted independently with patients that completed the relaxation, hypnosis, and placebo sessions, and with the informal caregivers who provided them the DFU care. The results of the present study will contribute for a better understanding of DFU progression, healing, prevention of re-ulceration and future amputations and, consequently, for the improvement of patients' quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
69

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2019

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 30, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 7, 2021

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2021

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 25, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

May 8, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

December 30, 2020

Last Update Submit

May 7, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Diabetic Foot UlcerUlcer HealingQuality of LifeHypnosisRelaxation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Impact of the DFU on patients' quality of life

    The Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form (DFS-SF; Bann, Fehnel, \& Gagnon, 2003; Research version by Pereira et al., 2022) will be used to assess patients´ DFU-related quality of life. Raw scores are transformed into a scale from 0 to 100. Higher results correspond to better DFU-related quality of life.

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Degree of DFU healing

    The degree of DFU healing will be assessed with the Portuguese version of "Resultados esperados de la valoración y evolución de la cicatrización de las heridas crónicas" Scale \[Expected results of the evaluation and evolution of the healing of chronic wounds Scale - RESVECH 2.0\] (Marques, 2015). The scores range from 0 to 35, where zero indicates complete healing.

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Physical quality of life

    The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36; Ferreira, 1998; Ferreira, Ferreira, \& Pereira, 2012) will be administered to assess patients' physical health-related quality of life. Raw scores are transformed into a scale from 0 to 100. Higher results correspond to better physical quality of life.

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Mental quality of life

    The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36; Ferreira, 1998; Ferreira, Ferreira, \& Pereira, 2012) will be administered to assess patients' mental health-related quality of life. Raw scores are transformed into a scale from 0 to 100. Higher results correspond to better mental quality of life.

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Metabolic marker

    The quantification of HbA1c in the plasma will be performed using the competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassay Cloud Clone Corp

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Inflammatory markers

    IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-a levels will be evaluated in the plasma using a LEGENDplexTM Human Angiogenesis Panel 1 Mix and Match (9-plex). Blood lymphocyte populations will be assessed in the whole blood by flow cytometry and automated hematological cell counter.

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Angiogenic markers

    Angiopoietin-2, EGF, FGF-basic, PECAM-1, PIGF, and VEGF levels will be assessed in the plasma using a LEGENDplexTM Human Angiogenesis Panel 1 Mix and Match (9-plex).

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • miRNA markers

    miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 will be assessed with SYBR Green technology, using the RNU6B gene as control.

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Immune cells

    Blood leukocyte and B and T-cell populations will be assessed in the whole blood by flow cytometry and automated hematological cell counter.

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Perceived Stress

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Emotional Distress

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Anxiety symptoms

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Depression symptoms

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Representations regarding the DFU

    Changes from baseline (T0) to the end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Sociodemographic data

    Baseline (T0)

  • Clinical data

    Baseline (T0), end of intervention/ 2 months later at post-test (T1), and after 6 months follow-up (T2)

  • Health literacy

    Baseline (T0)

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Muscle Relaxation with Guided Imagery

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the Experimental Group 1 will receive four individual 45-minute sessions, every two weeks, of progressive muscle relaxation intervention with guided imagery focused on ulcer healing, carried out by the Psychologist responsible for implementing the project, on the day of the Diabetic Foot appointments.

Behavioral: Muscle Relaxation with Guided Imagery

Hypnosis with Guided imagery

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the Experimental Group 2 will receive a four individual 45-minute sessions, every two weeks, of hypnosis intervention with guided imagery focused on ulcer healing, carried out by the qualified Hypnotherapists external to the research study, on the day of the Diabetic Foot appointments.

Behavioral: Hypnosis with Guided Imagery

Active Control Group

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants in the ACG will receive four individual 45-minute sessions of neutral guided imagery placebo focused on the patient's life before the foot ulcer, carried out by the Psychologist responsible for implementing the project, on the day of the Diabetic Foot appointments.

Behavioral: Neutral Guided Imagery

Passive Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in the PCG will not receive any intervention or placebo session.

Interventions

Relaxation intervention session begins with diaphragmatic breathing, followed by Jacobson's progressive muscle relaxation, which involves the contraction and subsequent relaxation of the 16 muscle groups of the body (forearm, arm, upper forehead, eye, mouth, jaw and throat, neck, shoulder, chest, stomach, thigh, leg and foot).The contraction is performed for 7 seconds while the relaxation lasts for about 40 to 50 seconds.The relaxation of the foot muscle group is only performed on the healthy foot, because dressing and bandages may bandage the foot with the DFU, which together with the typical joint stiffness of the diabetic foot, make it difficult to perform. After muscle relaxation, begins the guided imagery focused on DFU healing. The patient is instructed to think about his/her current state of health and to imagine the DFU as a dark area and the healing relaxation as a light associated to pleasant sensations, which will focus on the foot with DFU to heal it.

Muscle Relaxation with Guided Imagery

In the beginning of the first session we apply the Eye-Roll Test for Hypnotizability of Herbert Spiegel. Each session follows the Hypnotic Protocol with the following steps:Pre-talk/Absortion/Ratification/Aliciation/Dissociation/Awakening. The four sessions train the participants in visual, auditory and kinesthetic perception on ulcer healing. The protocol also promotes medical treatment acceptance.

Hypnosis with Guided imagery

This placebo consists of neutral guided imagery focused on themes of the patient's daily life before having DFU. Each session has a theme associated with the patient's life - family, work, friends, and leisure. Initially, the patient is asked to think about an event related to the theme of the session of his/her choice, positive or negative, which occurred before patient has the current DFU. Then, the patient is asked about a number of questions regarding the chosen episode in order to promote a more detailed reconstruction of the event. The patient is asked to imagine according to the instructions given by the Psychologist. When the whole episode is remembered, the patient is asked to tell what he or she imagined/remembered regarding each of the questions.

Active Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old or older;
  • Diabetes Mellitus diagnosis;
  • Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot;
  • Having one or two active chronic ulcers (\> 6 weeks and \< 14 weeks) at the time of baseline assessment;
  • Being followed at the Multidisciplinary Consultation of the Diabetic Foot from the Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP), at the Diabetic Foot Clinic from the Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa (CHTS) and from the Multidisciplinary Consultation of the Diabetic Foot of the Hospital de Braga (HB);
  • Presenting clinical levels of stress (scores \> 13 for males and \> 17 for females on the Perceived Stress Scale) or anxiety or depression (scores \> 11 on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale);
  • Providing written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • The active DFU at the time of the assessment being a relapse;
  • Having more than two DFUs at the time of baseline assessment;
  • Being on hemodialysis treatment;
  • Presence of psychosis or dementia described in the patient's medical record;
  • Having cancer disease;
  • Having undergone a transplant;
  • Receiving psychological counselling at the time of the assessment.
  • For the RCT qualitative nested study, twelve participants that completed at least 75% of the treatment or placebo sessions, and that report having a informal/ family caregiver will be invite the participate. Participants will be selected according to the following criteria:
  • Two typical cases of successful and unsuccessful patients with neuropathic foot, defined by the presence of neuropathic pain (e.g., heat, tingling, electrical shock), presence of distal pulses by palpation, and loss of protective sensitivity;
  • Two typical cases of successful and unsuccessful patients with neuroischemic foot, defined by the presence of peripheral artery disease, intense-variable pain, absence of distal pulses by palpation, and variable protective sensitivity.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Hospital de Braga

Braga, 4710-243, Portugal

Location

Clínica do Pé Diabético, Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa

Penafiel, 4564-007, Portugal

Location

Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto

Porto, 4099-001, Portugal

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Bann CM, Fehnel SE, Gagnon DD. Development and validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-short form (DFS-SF). Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(17):1277-90. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321170-00004.

    PMID: 14986739BACKGROUND
  • Bardin L. Análise de Conteúdo [Content Analysis]. 2016; São Paulo, Brasil: Almedina. Brasil.

    BACKGROUND
  • Brown CA, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Nov 8;6:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-54.

    PMID: 17092344BACKGROUND
  • Direção-Geral de Saúde, DGS [General Health Direction, Portugal] Circular Normativa Nº:05/PNPCD: Pé Diabético, Programa Nacional de Prevenção e Controlo da Diabetes (PNPCD) [Normative Circular Nº: 05 / PNPCD: Diabetic Foot, National Diabetes Prevention and Control Program]; 2010. Retrieved from http://www.dgs.pt/?cr=15718

    BACKGROUND
  • Ferreira P. A medição do estado de saúde: Criação da versão portuguesa do MOS SF-36 [Measuring health status: Creation of the Portuguese version of MOS SF-36]. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos e Investigação em Saúde, Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Coimbra; 1998. Ferreira PL, Ferreira LN, Pereira LN. Medidas sumário física e mental de estado de saúde para a população portuguesa [Physical and mental summary measures of health state for the Portuguese population]. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública. 2012;30(2):163-171. doi:10.1016/j.rpsp.2012.12.007.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ferreira V, Martins J, Loureiro L, Loureiro T, Borges L, Silveira D, … Almeida R. Consulta multidisciplinar do pé diabético: Avaliação dos fatores de mau prognóstico [Multidisciplinary consultation of diabetic foot - factors related with bad prognosis]. Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular. 2014;10:146-150. doi:10.1016/ j.ancv.2014.08.005

    BACKGROUND
  • Figueiras M, Marcelino DS, Claudino A, Cortes MA, Maroco J, Weinman J. Patients' illness schemata of hypertension: the role of beliefs for the choice of treatment. Psychol Health. 2010 Apr;25(4):507-17. doi: 10.1080/08870440802578961.

    PMID: 20204931BACKGROUND
  • Grant S, Mayo-Wilson E, Montgomery P, Macdonald G, Michie S, Hopewell S, Moher D; , on behalf of the CONSORT-SPI Group. CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials. Trials. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2735-z.

    PMID: 30060763BACKGROUND
  • International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot [IWGDF] International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot. International Diabetes Foundation; 2015. Retrieved from http://www.iwgdf.org/files/2015/website_prevention.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Marques JM. Adaptação cultural e validação para a população portuguesa de um instrumento de monitorização de feridas crónicas - escala RESVECH 2.0 [Cultural adaptation and validation for the Portuguese population of a chronic wound monitoring instrument - RESVECH 2.0 scale] (Master's Thesis). Instituto de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Católica, Porto; 2015.

    BACKGROUND
  • Pais-Ribeiro J, Silva I, Ferreira T, Martins A, Meneses R, Baltar M. Validation study of a Portuguese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Psychol Health Med. 2007 Mar;12(2):225-35; quiz 235-7. doi: 10.1080/13548500500524088. English, Portuguese.

    PMID: 17365902BACKGROUND
  • Paiva D, Silva S, Severo M, Ferreira P, Santos O, Lunet N, Azevedo A. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the health literacy assessment tool METER in the Portuguese adult population. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Nov;97(2):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.024. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

    PMID: 25107513BACKGROUND
  • Pandis N. Randomization. Part 3: allocation concealment and randomization implementation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jan;141(1):126-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.09.003. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22196195BACKGROUND
  • Spiegel H. An eye-roll test for hypnotizability. Am J Clin Hypn. 1972 Jul;15(1):25-8. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1972.10402206. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4679812BACKGROUND
  • Trigo M, Canudo N, Branco F, Silva D. Estudo das propriedades psicométricas da Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) na população Portuguesa [Psychometric proprieties of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) in Portuguese population]. Psychologica. 2010;53:353-378. doi:10.14195/1647-8606_53_17

    BACKGROUND
  • Sakpal TV. Sample size estimation in clinical trial. Perspect Clin Res. 2010 Apr;1(2):67-9.

    PMID: 21829786BACKGROUND
  • Ferreira G, Faria S, Carvalho A, Pereira MG. Relaxation intervention to improve diabetic foot ulcer healing: Results from a pilot randomized controlled study. Wound Repair Regen. 2023 Jul-Aug;31(4):528-541. doi: 10.1111/wrr.13085. Epub 2023 May 9.

    PMID: 37078427BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic Foot

Interventions

Muscle RelaxationImagery, PsychotherapyHypnosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesDiabetic AngiopathiesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesFoot UlcerLeg UlcerSkin UlcerSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetic Neuropathies

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscle ContractionMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological PhenomenaMind-Body TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • M. Graça Pereira, PhD

    School of Psychology, University of Minho

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) Eligible participants will be randomized into the four groups into blocks of variable size, multiples of three; and will be stratified according to: i) data collection site; ii) Chronic Renal Disease (CRD); and iii) Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD); since CRD and PAD are factors of poor prognosis in the DFU healing (Ferreira et al., 2014). This procedure will be performed using an online random number generator by an independent researcher unaware of the numeric coding for each group. After this procedure, it will not be possible to conceal the group to which the patient belongs from the researcher that will perform the psychological and placebo interventions. However, health professionals will be blinded during the entire procedure as they will only fill in the clinical questionnaire (doctors) and the RESVECH 2.0 (nurses), which assesses the DFU healing.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Parallel Assignment This is a Randomized Controlled Study of a Psychological Intervention (Grant et al., 2018). This study will use a mixed-methods approach nested in a 4-arm randomized control design. Qualitative and quantitative data will be collected in order to provide better understanding about the effectiveness of the hypnosis intervention in patients with DFU. Participants will be randomised at a ratio of 1:1 for the four conditions - EG1, EG2, ACG and PCG; and will be evaluated on the day of the first chronic DFU appointment or nursing treatment (T0), two months later (at the end of the intervention in EG, EG2, and ACG; T1), as well as six months later (T2) in a follow-up evaluation. Participants from all four groups will undergo standard treatment for the DFU, according to the guidelines of the Portuguese General Health Direction (DGS, 2010) and the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF, 2015).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor with Aggregation of School of Psychology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2020

First Posted

January 7, 2021

Study Start

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion

December 31, 2021

Study Completion

July 25, 2022

Last Updated

May 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations