EUS-Coeliac Plexus Block Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Pain Relief of Patients With Malignancy
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Coeliac Plexus Block Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Pain Relief of Patients With Intractable Pain Due to Malignancy A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many cancer patients suffer from intractable pain and which is often suboptimally controlled by even strong opioid analgesics. Coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is procedure which intended to permanently destroy the nociceptive pathway that transmits the pain caused by the tumour. It can be with different approaches, such as percutaneously guided by fluoroscopy, echo-endoscopically or surgically with endoscopic approach being the more popular one in many centers equipped with echo-endoscopic services. The effect of CPN has been well established by some retrospective series. The overall response rate to CPN ranges from 70-90%, however, the analgesic effect is limited and up to roughly around 3 months. It is believed that the short-lasting analgesic effect is related to incomplete neurolysis by absolute alcohol injection. Recently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of coeliac plexus has been introduced as another mode of CPN. So far, only one small single center randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggesting superior performance in favour to CPN using RFA. This result has to be validated and by a RCT with larger sample size. In addition, data concerning the quality of life (QOL) improvement and cost-effectiveness need to be further elucidated. Therefore, the aim of this study is to perform a RCT to look into these issues.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Sep 2020
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2024
CompletedMarch 22, 2021
March 1, 2021
3.4 years
March 10, 2021
March 17, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain score
Pain score at 4 weeks after procedure (by VAS score)
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Technical success rate
2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Clinical success rate
2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Duration of procedure
Up to 1 hour
Time to pain score drop by 50%
Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Short term complication rate
Up to 1 week
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EUS-CPB
ACTIVE COMPARATORChemical ablation of the coeliac plexus
EUS-CPA
ACTIVE COMPARATORRadiofrequency ablation of the coeliac plexus
Interventions
* coeliac plexus is identified and punctured * Injection of 10 mL of .25% bupivacaine, followed by 10 mL of 98% dehydrated alcohol.
* 10W-30W RFA will be applied unilaterally or bilaterally depends on individual anatomical characteristics for 10-50s * Complete ablation of coeliac plexus nervous tissue is confirmed by appearance of air-bubble ultrasound scan
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 year-old
- Patients who give informed consent to the study
- Suboptimal pain control with regular analgesics
- Inoperable cancer of pancreas
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to give consent
- Patients aged \<18 years
- EUS not possible due to:
- Problem related to scope insertion such as trismus, stenosis of the upper GI tract Coagulopathy with INR \>1.5 or platelet count \< 70
- Low oxygen saturation or extreme blood pressure render endoscopic procedure unsafe
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, 000000, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ka Wing Ma, MBBS, MS
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2021
First Posted
March 22, 2021
Study Start
September 21, 2020
Primary Completion
January 31, 2024
Study Completion
January 31, 2024
Last Updated
March 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03