Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis for Cancer Pain
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis for Cancer Pain: Chemical Versus Radiofrequency Ablation
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many cancer patients suffer from intractable pain and which is often suboptimally controlled by even strong opioid analgesics. Coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is procedure which intended to permanently destroy the nociceptive pathway that transmits the pain caused by the tumour. It can be with different approaches, such as percutaneously guided by fluoroscopy, echo-endoscopically or surgically with endoscopic approach being the more popular one in many centers equipped with echo-endoscopic services. The effect of CPN has been well established by some retrospective series. The overall response rate to CPN ranges from 70-90%, however, the analgesic effect is limited and up to roughly around 3 months. It is believed that the short-lasting analgesic effect is related to incomplete neurolysis by absolute alcohol injection. Recently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of coeliac plexus has been introduced as another mode of CPN. So far, only one small single center randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggesting superior performance in favour to CPN using RFA. This result has to be validated and by a RCT with larger sample size. In addition, data concerning the quality of life (QOL) improvement and cost-effectiveness need to be further elucidated. Therefore, the aim of this study is to perform a RCT to look into these issues.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Mar 2021
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2025
CompletedMarch 22, 2021
March 1, 2021
2.9 years
March 8, 2021
March 17, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change of pain score
change of pain score at 4th week after the procedure (by VAS score)
4 weeks after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Change of pain score
2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Analgesic requirement
Up to 100 months (From the date of procedure until the date of death from any cause)
Technical success rate
1 day
Clinical success rate
Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Duration of procedure
Up to 1 hour
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EUS-CPB
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndoscopic Ultrasound Guided Coeliac Plexus Block
EUS-CPA
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndoscopic Ultrasound Guided Coeliac Plexus Radiofrequency Ablation
Interventions
Chemical ablation is performed by injection of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, followed by 10 mL of 98% dehydrated alcohol using a 22G FNA needle (Cook and Olympus)
coeliac plexus is identified and punctured with 19G EUSRA RFA needle with 10W-30W of energy for 10-50s bilaterally or unilaterally depends on individual anatomical characteristics.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 year-old
- Patients who give informed consent to the study
- Suboptimal pain control with regular analgesics
- Inoperable cancer of pancreas, biliary system and liver (both primary or secondary)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to give consent
- Patients aged \<18 years
- EUS not possible due to:
- Problem related to scope insertion such as trismus, stenosis of the upper GI tract
- Coagulopathy with INR \>1.5 or platelet count \< 70
- Low oxygen saturation or extreme blood pressure render endoscopic procedure unsafe
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, 000000, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ka Wing Ma, MBBS, MS
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2021
First Posted
March 16, 2021
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 31, 2024
Study Completion
March 31, 2025
Last Updated
March 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03