NCT04805619

Brief Summary

The long and very long stents, although they represent a greater navigability challenge, especially in tortuous and calcified coronary arteries, they have the advantage of providing shorter procedural time, with less contrast use, less exposure to radiation, lower cost, lower risk of occlusion of lateral branches, as well as less interference in the local flow. However, in the context of the use of such long stents, as some vessels have a tapering shape, with a progressively smaller diameter in their more distal segments (as is the typical case of the left anterior descending artery), a significant disproportion (mismatch) of vessel size between the proximal and distal landing zone of the stent can be noted. Such disproportion may lead to the underestimation of the proximal reference or overestimation of the distal reference diameter of the vessel, generating an increase of the stress on the vessel wall, with consequent increase in the risk of restenosis. In view of this situation, long or very long stents were developed in a tapered shape, with progressive reduction of their diameter between their proximal and distal portion, respecting the phenomenon of tapering of the coronary artery during the treatment of very long lesions.Some of these stents also have a hybrid design, with closed cells at the ends and open cells in the middle, allowing a more efficient expansion in their middle portion (thus avoiding the dog-boning phenomenon). However, there is still a lack of studies in the literature evaluating whether these DES in a tapered shape and hybrid cells may effectively heal over time, specially with respect to strut covering and strut malapposition. Thus, this is a prospective, single-arm, open-label study, including patients presenting at least one long or very long lesion (≥ 30 mm), who will undergo angioplasty with a tapered DES. The objective is to analyze the neointimal healing as well as other data on the efficacy and safety of the tapered DES Biomime Morph in patients with long or very long lesions.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 7, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 12, 2021

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2021

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 8, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 8, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 25, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

March 12, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 24, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

AtherosclerosisStentLong coronary lesionsAngioplastyNeointimal healingTapering

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary endpoint is the stent coverage and neo-intimal growth assessed at six months. The neointimal healing score is based on four scaffold- or stent-related characteristics and is calculated on a lesion level:

    1. Presence of filling defect (% intraluminal defect, ILD) is assigned a weight of "4" 2. Presence of both malapposed and uncovered struts (% malapposed/uncovered, MU) is assigned a weight of "3" 3. Presence of uncovered struts alone (% malapposed, M) is assigned a weight of "2" 4. Presence of malapposed struts alone (% uncovered, U) is assigned a weight of "1" Neointimal healing score = (%ILD \* 4)+(%MU \* 3)+(%U \* 2)+(%M \* 1).

    Six months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Major adverse cardiac events and Stent Thrombosis

    30 days, 6 months and 1 year

  • Efficacy secondary endpoints

    6 months and 12 months

Study Arms (1)

Arm 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients with long or very long lesions (≥ 30 mm) in native coronary arteries.

Device: Biomime Morph, a tapered drug eluting stent (DES) with hybrid design

Interventions

Biomime Morph DES is a cobalt-chromium stent, with strut thickness of 65 µm, a hybrid cell design (closed cells in the extremity and open cells in the middle) and a conic shape, where the proximal part of the stent is 0.5 mm larger than the distal part (Table 1). In addition, the Biomime Morph elutes Sirolimus from a biodegradable polymer matrix.

Also known as: Stent
Arm 1

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • General clinical criteria
  • Both gender with age ≥ 18 years
  • Clinical indication for a PCI with a DES due to an acute coronary syndrome for unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), stable angina, or in asymptomatic patients with objective evidence of ischemia.
  • Angiographic criteria
  • Lesions with a length ≥ 30 mm, amenable for the treatment with only one stent
  • Up to 2 "de novo" lesions/patients in native vessels
  • Vessel diameter between 2.5 and 4 mm.

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous use of brachytherapy or a stent in the target vessel;
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction \<25%;
  • bleeding diathesis;
  • Contraindication to aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitors, heparina or any component of the DES.
  • Creatinine levels \> 2.0mg/dl;
  • Leucocyte count \< 3.500 céls/mm3;
  • Platelet count \< 100.000 céls/mm³
  • Pregnancy;
  • Surgical procedure scheduled within the next 6 months, except if DAPT could be maintained;
  • Impossibility to provide written informed consent.
  • Angiographic Criteria
  • Left main disease \> 50%;
  • Bifurcation lesions with side branch \> 2.0mm in diameter where a stent should be required in the side branch (2-stent technique);
  • Occluded vessel (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infaction grade 0 /1)
  • Restenosis;
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Instituto do Coração - HCFMUSP

São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (26)

  • Berry D. The unlocking of the coronary arteries: origins of angioplasty. A short historical review of arterial dilatation from Dotter to the creative Gruentzig. Eur Heart J. 2009 Jun;30(12):1421-2. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp182. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19525552BACKGROUND
  • Honda Y, Muramatsu T, Ito Y, Sakai T, Hirano K, Yamawaki M, Araki M, Kobayashi N, Takimura H, Sakamoto Y, Mouri S, Tsutumi M, Takama T, Takafuji H, Tokuda T, Makino K. Impact of ultra-long second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 1;87(2):E44-53. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26010. Epub 2015 May 23.

    PMID: 26010548BACKGROUND
  • Bouras G, Jhamnani S, Ng VG, Haimi I, Mao V, Deible R, Cao S, Sudhir K, Lansky AJ. Clinical outcomes after PCI treatment of very long lesions with the XIENCE V everolimus eluting stent; Pooled analysis from the SPIRIT and XIENCE V USA prospective multicenter trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):984-991. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26711. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

    PMID: 27545721BACKGROUND
  • Sgueglia GA, Belloni F, Summaria F, Conte M, Cortese B, Silva PL, Ricci R, Lioy E, Pucci E, Gaspardone A. One-year follow-up of patients treated with new-generation polymer-based 38 mm everolimus-eluting stent: the P38 study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb 1;85(2):218-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25542. Epub 2014 May 26.

    PMID: 24824088BACKGROUND
  • Meier B, Gruentzig AR, Hollman J, Ischinger T, Bradford JM. Does length or eccentricity of coronary stenoses influence the outcome of transluminal dilatation? Circulation. 1983 Mar;67(3):497-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.67.3.497.

    PMID: 6217920BACKGROUND
  • Kornowski R, Bhargava B, Fuchs S, Lansky AJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Hong MK, Kent KM, Mehran R, Stone GW, Leon MB. Procedural results and late clinical outcomes after percutaneous interventions using long (> or = 25 mm) versus short (< 20 mm) stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Mar 1;35(3):612-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00580-x.

    PMID: 10716462BACKGROUND
  • Schalij MJ, Udayachalerm W, Oemrawsingh P, Jukema JW, Reiber JH, Bruschke AV. Stenting of long coronary artery lesions: initial angiographic results and 6-month clinical outcome of the micro stent II-XL. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 Sep;48(1):105-12. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(199909)48:13.0.co;2-0.

    PMID: 10467083BACKGROUND
  • Kobayashi Y, De Gregorio J, Kobayashi N, Akiyama T, Reimers B, Finci L, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Stented segment length as an independent predictor of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Sep;34(3):651-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00303-4.

    PMID: 10483943BACKGROUND
  • Kobayashi Y, De Gregorio J, Kobayashi N, Reimers B, Albiero R, Vaghetti M, Finci L, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Sep 1;84(5):499-504. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00366-5.

    PMID: 10482144BACKGROUND
  • Di Sciascio G, Patti G, Nasso G, Manzoli A, D'Ambrosio A, Abbate A. Early and long-term results of stenting of diffuse coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Dec 1;86(11):1166-70. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01197-8.

    PMID: 11090785BACKGROUND
  • Kastrati A, Elezi S, Dirschinger J, Hadamitzky M, Neumann FJ, Schomig A. Influence of lesion length on restenosis after coronary stent placement. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 15;83(12):1617-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00165-4.

    PMID: 10392864BACKGROUND
  • Saucedo JF, Kennard ED, Popma JJ, Talley D, Lansky A, Leon MB, Baim DS. Importance of lesion length on new device angioplasty of native coronary arteries. NACI Investigators. New Approaches to Coronary Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000 May;50(1):19-25. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200005)50:13.0.co;2-h.

    PMID: 10816274BACKGROUND
  • Kornowski R, Mehran R, Hong MK, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Mintz GS, Waksman R, Laird JR, Lansky AJ, Bucher TA, Popma JJ, Leon MB. Procedural results and late clinical outcomes after placement of three or more stents in single coronary lesions. Circulation. 1998 Apr 14;97(14):1355-61. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.14.1355.

    PMID: 9577946BACKGROUND
  • Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA, Santos RM, Gandhi SK, Little WC. Effect of length and diameter of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents on late outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(1):35-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.805630. Epub 2009 Feb 10.

    PMID: 20031691BACKGROUND
  • Shirai S, Kimura T, Nobuyoshi M, Morimoto T, Ando K, Soga Y, Yamaji K, Kondo K, Sakai K, Arita T, Goya M, Iwabuchi M, Yokoi H, Nosaka H, Mitsudo K; j-Cypher Registry Investigators. Impact of multiple and long sirolimus-eluting stent implantation on 3-year clinical outcomes in the j-Cypher Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Feb;3(2):180-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.11.009.

    PMID: 20170875BACKGROUND
  • Degertekin M, Arampatzis CA, Lemos PA, Saia F, Hoye A, Daemen J, Tanabe K, Lee CH, Hofma SJ, Sianos G, McFadden E, van der Giessen W, Smits PC, de Feyter PJ, van Domburg RT, Serruys PW. Very long sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo coronary lesions. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Apr 1;93(7):826-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.018.

    PMID: 15050483BACKGROUND
  • Lee CW, Park DW, Lee BK, Kim YH, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Predictors of restenosis after placement of drug-eluting stents in one or more coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Feb 15;97(4):506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.084. Epub 2006 Jan 4.

    PMID: 16461047BACKGROUND
  • Kastrati A, Dibra A, Mehilli J, Mayer S, Pinieck S, Pache J, Dirschinger J, Schomig A. Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary implantation of sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents. Circulation. 2006 May 16;113(19):2293-300. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.601823. Epub 2006 May 8.

    PMID: 16682614BACKGROUND
  • Tsagalou E, Chieffo A, Iakovou I, Ge L, Sangiorgi GM, Corvaja N, Airoldi F, Montorfano M, Michev I, Colombo A. Multiple overlapping drug-eluting stents to treat diffuse disease of the left anterior descending coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 17;45(10):1570-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.049.

    PMID: 15893168BACKGROUND
  • Hoffmann R, Herrmann G, Silber S, Braun P, Werner GS, Hennen B, Rupprecht H, vom Dahl J, Hanrath P; IMPact Upon Long Lesion StEnting Study Group. Randomized comparison of success and adverse event rates and cost effectiveness of one long versus two short stents for treatment of long coronary narrowings. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Sep 1;90(5):460-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02514-6.

    PMID: 12208402BACKGROUND
  • Timmins LH, Meyer CA, Moreno MR, Moore JE Jr. Mechanical modeling of stents deployed in tapered arteries. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008 Dec;36(12):2042-50. doi: 10.1007/s10439-008-9582-0. Epub 2008 Oct 10.

    PMID: 18846425BACKGROUND
  • Hehrlein C, DeVries JJ, Arab A, Haller SD, Kloostra A, Lauer MA, Foster MT, Fischell TA. Role of the "dogbone" effect of balloon-expandable stents: quantitative coronary analysis of DUET and NIR stent implantation introducing a novel indexing system. J Invasive Cardiol. 2002 Feb;14(2):59-65.

    PMID: 11818639BACKGROUND
  • Valero E, Consuegra-Sanchez L, Minana G, Garcia-Blas S, Rodriguez JC, Moyano P, Sanchis J, Nunez J. Initial experience with the novel BioMime 60 mm-long sirolimus-eluting tapered stent system in long coronary lesions. EuroIntervention. 2018 Jan 20;13(13):1591-1594. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00616. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28870879BACKGROUND
  • Premchand RK, Kumar YS. A Report of Successful Procedural, Clinical, and Angiographic Outcomes with a Tapered Stent of a Patient in Naturally Tapered Coronary Vessel. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):OD06-OD07. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22241.9288. Epub 2017 Jan 1.

    PMID: 28273994BACKGROUND
  • Menown IB. Very long stent technology: clinical and practical value. Future Cardiol. 2013 Sep;9(5):641-4. doi: 10.2217/fca.13.50. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24020665BACKGROUND
  • Raber L, Onuma Y, Brugaletta S, Garcia-Garcia HM, Backx B, Iniguez A, Okkels Jensen L, Cequier-Fillat A, Pilgrim T, Christiansen EH, Hofma SH, Suttorp M, Serruys PW, Sabate M, Windecker S. Arterial healing following primary PCI using the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) versus the durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent (XIENCE) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the randomised TROFI II study. EuroIntervention. 2016 Jul 20;12(4):482-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M08_03.

    PMID: 26342471BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerosis

Interventions

Stents

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostheses and ImplantsEquipment and Supplies

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a prospective, single-arm, open-label study, including patients presenting at least one long or very long lesion (≥ 30 mm), who will undergo angioplasty with a tapered DES
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2021

First Posted

March 18, 2021

Study Start

November 7, 2019

Primary Completion

December 8, 2021

Study Completion

December 8, 2021

Last Updated

May 25, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Locations