NCT04804592

Brief Summary

The aim is to find out more about how corneal sensory fibres react to different types of stimuli (liquid / tactile / nylon thread) and how this can be consciously perceived by the individual. Is it possible to generate a stimulus that delivers a repeatable and reliable response within a useful stimulus force range which allows an interpretation / evaluation of normal / expected activity of superficial nerve fibres in the cornea? The study group will be divided into three groups of individuals: two groups with different types of contact lenses (CL) and one without CL, as sensitivity changes are thought to occur with CL wear. A very interesting research question is to find out, if such sensitivity differences can be detected with the nature of the stimuli applied in this study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
111

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 11, 2021

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2021

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 17, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

March 11, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 16, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

corneaocular surface sensationcorneal sensitivitycontact lens wear

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Repeatability of mechanical corneal sensation thresholds with the liquid jet protoype esthesiometer

    Evaluation of repeatability of mechanical corneal sensation thresholds for the measurement with the liquid jet esthesiometer prototype instrument (in mbar): the corneal sensation thresholds will be obtained with the double staircase method (with forced choice) and the stimulus represents a liquid jet (consisting of isotonic saline solution).

    two weeks

  • Repeatability of mechanical corneal sensation thresholds with the tactile prototype esthesiometer

    Evaluation of variability / repeatability of mechanical corneal sensation thresholds for the measurement with the tactile esthesiometer prototype instrument (in mN): the corneal sensation thresholds will be obtained with the double staircase method (with forced choice) and the stimulus represents a small, round plastic ball.

    two weeks

  • Repeatability of mechanical corneal sensation thresholds with the Cochet Bonnet esthesiometer

    Evaluation of repeatability of mechanical corneal sensation thresholds for the measurement with the Cochet Bonnet instrument (in mN): the corneal sensation thresholds will be obtained with the double staircase method (with forced choice) and the stimulus represents a nylon thread, whereby its force is proportional to the length of the nylon thread applied to the corneal surface.

    two weeks

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Correlation between corneal sensation thresholds with the Cochet Bonnet esthesiometer

    one day

  • Correlation between corneal sensation thresholds with the liquid jet prototype esthesiometer

    one day

  • Correlation between corneal sensation thresholds with the tactile prototype esthesiometer

    one day

  • Comparison of corneal sensation thresholds, obtained with the Cochet Bonnet esthesiometer, between the three groups in the study population

    two weeks

  • Comparison of corneal sensation thresholds, obtained with the liquid jet prototype esthesiometer, between the three groups in the study population

    two weeks

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Group A: SiHy CL

EXPERIMENTAL

Silicone hydrogel (SiHy) CL wear at least 3 days per week and at least 8 hours per day;

Device: Tactile Esthesiometer PrototypeDevice: Liquid Jet Esthesiometer PrototypeDevice: Cochet Bonnet esthesiometer

Group B: RGP CL

EXPERIMENTAL

Rigid gas permeable (RGP) CL wear at least 3 days per week and at least 8 hours per day;

Device: Tactile Esthesiometer PrototypeDevice: Liquid Jet Esthesiometer PrototypeDevice: Cochet Bonnet esthesiometer

Group C: no CL wear

EXPERIMENTAL

No current CL wear for at least 3 months;

Device: Tactile Esthesiometer PrototypeDevice: Liquid Jet Esthesiometer PrototypeDevice: Cochet Bonnet esthesiometer

Interventions

A round plastic nozzle (1.8mm diameter) used as a stimulus for corneal sensation threshold measurement

Group A: SiHy CLGroup B: RGP CLGroup C: no CL wear

Balanced salt solution with a pH value similar to the tear film uesd as a liquid jet stimulus for corneal sensation threshold measurement

Group A: SiHy CLGroup B: RGP CLGroup C: no CL wear

A nylon thread (0.12mm diameter) used as a stimulus for corneal sensation threshold measurement

Group A: SiHy CLGroup B: RGP CLGroup C: no CL wear

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Group A:
  • Silicone hydrogel (SiHy) CL wear at least 3 days per week and at least 8 hours per day; 18 - 50 years of age; healthy eyes with OSDI \</= 13
  • Group B:
  • Rigid gas permeable (RGP) CL wear at least 3 days per week and at least 8 hours per day; 18 - 50 years of age; healthy eyes with OSDI \</= 13
  • Group C:
  • No current CL wear for at least 3 months; 18 - 50 years of age; healthy eyes with OSDI \</= 13

You may not qualify if:

  • Systemic disease that may affect ocular health, such as diabetes
  • Injury and history of operations on the anterior segment of the eye
  • regular application of systemic or ocular medication known to affect the tear film, specifically on the day of measurement

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Institute of Optometry, FHNW

Olten, Canton of Solothurn, 4600, Switzerland

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Belmonte C, Acosta MC, Gallar J. Neural basis of sensation in intact and injured corneas. Exp Eye Res. 2004 Mar;78(3):513-25. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2003.09.023.

    PMID: 15106930BACKGROUND
  • Bergenske PD, Polse KA. The effect of rigid gas permeable lenses on corneal sensitivity. J Am Optom Assoc. 1987 Mar;58(3):212-5.

    PMID: 3471806BACKGROUND
  • Knoll HA, Williams J. Effects of hydrophilic contact lenses on corneal sensitivity. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1970 Jul;47(7):561-3. doi: 10.1097/00006324-197007000-00007. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5270397BACKGROUND
  • Millodot M. Does the long term wear of contact lenses produce a loss of corneal sensitivity? Experientia. 1977 Nov 15;33(11):1475-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01918817.

    PMID: 923715BACKGROUND
  • Muller LJ, Marfurt CF, Kruse F, Tervo TM. Corneal nerves: structure, contents and function. Exp Eye Res. 2003 May;76(5):521-42. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(03)00050-2.

    PMID: 12697417BACKGROUND
  • Golebiowski B, Chao C, Stapleton F, Jalbert I. Corneal Nerve Morphology, Sensitivity, and Tear Neuropeptides in Contact Lens Wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Apr;94(4):534-542. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001063.

    PMID: 28338565BACKGROUND
  • Stapleton F, Chao C, Golebiowski B. Topical Review: Effects of Contact Lens Wear on Corneal, Conjunctival, and Lid Margin Sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Oct;96(10):790-801. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001429.

    PMID: 31592962BACKGROUND
  • Golebiowski B, Papas EB, Stapleton F. Factors affecting corneal and conjunctival sensitivity measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Apr;85(4):241-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181694f96.

    PMID: 18382334BACKGROUND
  • Stapleton F, Golebiowski B, Skotnitsky C, Tan ME, Holden BA. Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity in intolerant contact lens wearers. J Optom. 2015 Jan-Mar;8(1):62-3. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 7. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25649641BACKGROUND
  • Golebiowski B, Papas EB, Stapleton F. Corneal and conjunctival sensory function: the impact on ocular surface sensitivity of change from low to high oxygen transmissibility contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Mar 9;53(3):1177-81. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8416.

    PMID: 22281824BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Corneal Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Daniela S Nosch, PhD

    University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland FHNW

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2021

First Posted

March 18, 2021

Study Start

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 20, 2021

Study Completion

December 20, 2021

Last Updated

March 17, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations