WATER III: Aquablation vs. Transurethral Laser Enucleation of Large Prostates (80 - 180mL) in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
WATER III
1 other identifier
interventional
202
2 countries
5
Brief Summary
Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety of Aquablation (AQUABEAM Robotic System®, PROCEPT BioRobotics, Redwood City, CA, USA) and transurethral laser enucleation as surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with large prostates (80-180ml).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 16, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2029
ExpectedFebruary 6, 2025
February 1, 2025
4.1 years
March 10, 2021
February 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Primary Efficacy Endpoint
Primary efficacy endpoint is defined as IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) change
3 months after index procedure
Primary Safety Endpoint
Primary safety endpoint is defined as the occurrence of an Adverse Event rated by the investigator as related or unrelated to the study procedure, classified as Clavien Dindo grade 2 or higher or any grade 1 event resulting in persistent disability, such as ejaculatory or erectile dysfunction or incontinence, as evidenced through 3 months after treatment.
Through 3 months after index procedure
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in IPSS
1,6,12,24,36,48 and 60 months after index procedure
Change in IIEF 5/SHIM
3,6,12,24,36,48 and 60 months after index procedure
Change in MSHQ-EjD-SF
3,6,12,24,36,48 and 60 months after index procedure
Change in Dysuria Questionnaire
1,3,6,12,24,36,48 and 60 months after index procedure
Change in ICIQ-UI-SF
1,3,6,12, 24,36,48 and 60 months after index procedure
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Aquablation therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORAquablation therapy: Computer-assisted transurethral ablation of prostate tissue using a high-pressure water jet. Subsequent removal of residual ablated tissue at the bladder neck and haemostasis by transurethral electroresection (TUR).
Transurethral laser enucleation
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransurethral laser enucleation of the prostate using thulium laser (ThuLEP) or holmium laser (HoLEP).
Interventions
Aquablation is carried out with the AQUABEAM Robotic System®, PROCEPT BioRobotics, Redwood City, CA, USA
Transurethral laser enucleation is performed according to the standard established at the respective test center. Included laser techniques: Holmium laser (HoLEP) and Thulium laser (ThuLEP).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 45 - 80 years
- International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 8
- Prostate size (measurement by transrectal ultrasound): 80 - 180 mL
- Subject has diagnosis of LUTS (Lower urinary tract symptoms) due to BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
- Patient is mentally capable and willing to sign a study-specific consent form
- Subjects with the ability to follow study instructions and likely to attend and complete all required visits
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Body mass index ≥ 42
- Suspected or history of prostate cancer
- Suspected or history of bladder cancer
- Bladder stone
- Indwelling catheter for more than 3 months before baseline
- Active urinary tract infection
- History of urethral stricture or bladder neck stenosis
- Damage of the external urethral sphincter
- Previous prostate surgery or history of lower urinary tract surgery (e.g. urinary diversion, artificial sphincter or penile prosthesis)
- Use of anticoagulants (if medication cannot be stopped before and after procedure) or known coagulopathy (except ASS 100mg/d).
- Contraindications for general and spinal anaesthesia
- The investigator considers a pre-existing condition or the subject's life circumstances to be problematic for the conduct of the study and the completion of the follow-up investigations
- Subject is unwilling to accept a blood transfusion if required
- Subject is not able to give consent
- Subject without legal capacity who is unable to understand the nature, scope, significance and consequences of this clinical trial
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Bonnlead
- PROCEPT BioRoboticscollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Department of Urology, University Hospital Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79106, Germany
Department of Urology, Augusta-Kranken-Anstalt, Bochum Mitte
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44791, Germany
Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53127, Germany
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom
Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manuel Ritter, Univ.-Prof. Dr. med.
Department of Urology, University of Bonn
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Manuel Ritter
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2021
First Posted
March 17, 2021
Study Start
December 16, 2020
Primary Completion
January 16, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2029
Last Updated
February 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share