Effectiveness of the EMPOWER™ Modular Pacing System and EMBLEM™ Subcutaneous ICD to Communicate Antitachycardia Pacing
MODULAR ATP
1 other identifier
interventional
297
9 countries
38
Brief Summary
The MODULAR ATP Clinical Study is designed to demonstrate safety, performance, and effectiveness of the Modular Cardiac Rhythm Management (mCRM) Therapy System.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
38 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 6, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2030
ExpectedApril 29, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.8 years
March 8, 2021
May 6, 2025
April 16, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Safety Endpoint 1: Percentage of Subjects Without Major EMPOWER MPS System- or Procedure-Related Complications Through 6 Months
Major EMPOWER MPS System- and Procedure-related Complication-Free Rate Subjects will be assessed for safety issues related to the procedure or system through 6 months post implant
Implant through 6 Months Post-Implant
Safety Endpoint 2: Percentage of Subjects Without Major EMPOWER MPS System- or Procedure-Related Complications Through 12 Months
Major EMPOWER MPS System- and Procedure-related Complication-free Rate Subjects will be assessed for safety issues related to the procedure or system through 12 months post implant
Implant through 12 Months Post-Implant
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint 1: Percentage of Body Postures With Communication Success Between the S-ICD and EMPOWER PG
Communication Success between the S-ICD and EMPOWER PG Data from subjects will be assessed for effectiveness of communication between S-ICD and the EMPOWER PG by evaluating if a paced beat is present during communication testing in four postures: upright, supine, and right and left side.
At the 6 Month Follow-up
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint 2: Percentage of Subjects Classified as a Pacing Capture Threshold (PCT) Responder
Proportion of Subjects with Adequate Pacing Capture Threshold Effectiveness will be confirmed by evaluating the percentage of subjects considered to be a PCT Responder, defined as a subject with a PCT measurement of ≤ 2.0 V @ 0.4 ms pulse width
At the 6 Month Follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint: Subject-specific Slope of EMPOWER PG Sensor-Indicated Rate to the Subject's Workload on Treadmill Test
At the 3 Month Visit
Secondary Safety Endpoint
Implant through 2 years post-implant
Study Arms (1)
MODULAR ATP Study Participants
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects that signed the informed consent were included. Patients consented to receive the mCRM Therapy System which consists of the EMPOWER Leadless Pacemaker and an EMBLEM S-ICD upgraded with investigational firmware.
Interventions
Communication testing between S-ICD and LCP in 4 body postures as well as required electrical testing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient who meets Class I, IIa, or IIb guideline ICD indications\[i\],\[ii\], or who has an existing TV-ICD\[iii\] or S-ICD\[iv\]
- Patient who is deemed to be at risk for MVT based on at least ONE of the following:
- History of Non-Sustained MVT with LVEF ≤ 50%
- History of sustained VT/VF (secondary prevention) with LVEF ≤ 50% or significant cardiac scar\*
- History of syncope deemed to be arrhythmic in origin
- History of ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF ≤35%
- History of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF ≤35% and significant scar\*
- Patient who is willing and capable of providing informed consent (which is not to include the use of a legally authorized representative (LAR) for documentation of informed consent) and participating in all testing associated with this investigation at an approved study site and at the intervals defined by this protocol
- Patient who is age 18 years or above, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national law
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with an ongoing complication due to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) infection or CIED explant
- Transvenous lead remnants within the heart from a previously implanted CIED (Note: transvenous lead remnants outside the heart (e.g., in the SVC) are allowed)
- Patient with a known LA thrombus
- Patient with a ventricular arrhythmia due to a reversible cause
- Patient indicated for implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
- Patient with another implanted medical device that could interfere with implant of the leadless pacemaker, such as an implanted inferior vena cava filter or mechanical tricuspid heart valve
- Patient requires rate-responsive pacing therapy
- Patient is entirely pacemaker-dependent (defined as escape rhythm ≤ 30 bpm)
- Patient with Acute Coronary Syndrome (i.e. Acute Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina) within 40 days
- Inability to access femoral vein with a 21-French or larger inner diameter introducer sheath due to known anatomy condition, recent surgery, and/ or other relevant condition
- Patient who has an active implanted electronic medical device intended for chronic use concomitantly with the study system, such as a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Note that a temporary pacing wire is allowed.
- Patient with known or suspected sensitivity to Dexamethasone Acetate (DXA)
- Patient with a known cardiovascular anatomy that precludes implant in the right ventricle
- Patient with a known allergy to any system components
- Patient with a known or suspected intolerance to S-ICD conversion testing, based on physician discretion
- +9 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (38)
Banner University Medical Center Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States
Scottsdale Healthcare - Shea
Scottsdale, Arizona, 84258, United States
Arrhythmia Research Group
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401, United States
AdventHealth Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308, United States
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Cooper Hospital - University Medical Center
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
Northwell University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Ohio Health Research Institute
Columbus, Ohio, 43214, United States
Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Erlanger Medical Center
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403, United States
Sentara Norfolk General
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Kepler Universitaetsklinikum
Linz, Austria
Institut de Cardiologie de Quebec (Montreal Heart)
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8, Canada
Institut Universitaire de Cardilogie et Pnuemologie de Quebec (IUCPQ)
Québec, Canada
Na Homolce Hospital
Prague, Czechia
CHU Grenoble - Hospital Michallon
Grenoble, France
CHRU de Lille
Lille, 59000, France
CHU de Nantes-Hopital Laennec
Nantes, France
Hospital European Georges-Pompidou
Paris, France
Spedali Civil di Brescia
Brescia, Italy
Maria Cecilia Hospital SPA
Cotignola, Italy
AZ Osp Monaldi
Naples, 80131, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, 56126, Italy
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, Netherlands
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Erasmus MC University Medical Center
Rotterdam, 3015 CE, Netherlands
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
The General Infirmary
Leeds, LS1 EX, United Kingdom
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
Liverpool, L14 3PE, United Kingdom
Manchester Heart Center
Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
Southampton University Hospital
Southampton, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Lloyd MS, Brisben AJ, Reddy VY, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Boersma LVA, Bongiorni MG, Burke MC, Cantillon DJ, Doshi R, Friedman PA, Gras D, Kutalek SP, Neuzil P, Roberts PR, Wright DJ, Appl U, West J, Carter N, Stein KM, Mont L, Knops RE. Design and rationale of the MODULAR ATP global clinical trial: A novel intercommunicative leadless pacing system and the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm O2. 2023 Jun 2;4(7):448-456. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.05.004. eCollection 2023 Jul.
PMID: 37520021BACKGROUNDKnops RE, Lloyd MS, Roberts PR, Wright DJ, Boersma LVA, Doshi R, Friedman PA, Neuzil P, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Bongiorni MG, Burke MC, Gras D, Kutalek SP, Amin AK, Fu EY, Epstein LM, Tolosana JM, Callahan TD, Aasbo JD, Augostini R, Manyam H, Nair DG, Mondesert B, Su WW, Pepper C, Miller MA, Grammes J, Saleh K, Marquie C, Merchant FM, Cha YM, Cunnington C, Frankel DS, West J, Matznick E, Swackhamer B, Brisben AJ, Weinstock J, Stein KM, Reddy VY, Mont L; MODULAR ATP Investigators. A Modular Communicative Leadless Pacing-Defibrillator System. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 17;391(15):1402-1412. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2401807. Epub 2024 May 18.
PMID: 38767244RESULTLloyd MS, Reddy VY, Roberts P, Doshi RN, Wright DL, Boersma LVA, Friedman PA, Neuzil P, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Bongiorni MG, Burke MC, Gras D, Kutalek SP, Marijon E, Tolosana JM, Amin AK, Epstein LM, Aasbo JD, Callahan TD, Brisben AJ, West J, Matznick E, Speakman B, Bachman TN, Mont L, Knops RE. One-Year Outcomes of the MODULAR ATP Trial: A Novel Leadless Pacemaker in Wireless Communication With a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2026 Jan;19(1):e014395. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.125.014395. Epub 2025 Nov 13.
PMID: 41231774DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study is limited by the nonrandomized design with no comparator group. Prespecified goals for safety and performance were used to define endpoints. Patients were selected with a high risk of ventricular tachycardia. The findings may not be generalizable to other patients who require S-ICDs or who have S-ICDs already implanted.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Julie West
- Organization
- Boston Scientific
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Lloyd, MD
Emory University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Reinoud Knops, MD, PhD
Amsterdam University Medical Centre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lluis Mont, MD, PhD
Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vivek Reddy, MD
The Mount Sinai Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2021
First Posted
March 15, 2021
Study Start
July 20, 2021
Primary Completion
May 6, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2030
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Results First Posted
June 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share IPD with other researchers in this study.