Developing a Test of Uterine Lavage for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer Detection by Uterine Lavage DNA and Serum Proteins: a Phase 2 Biomarker Study
3 other identifiers
observational
250
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The study aims to develop a test for early detection of ovarian cancer using DNA from a growth involving the ovary found in a washing of the uterus (womb), and proteins found in the blood. The samples of the wash and the blood will be taken before surgery. After surgery, doctors will determine whether the participant had ovarian cancer or a benign disease of the ovaries. The tests of the washings and the blood will be examined to see how much the participants with ovarian cancer can be separated from the participants with a benign ovarian disease by the tests. Small amounts from the washing and the blood samples will be sent to four sites for analysis. Statistical analyses of these data will compare tumor DNA found in the washing of the uterus with proteins in the blood to detect cases of ovarian cancer. The primary goal is to find tests that are mostly positive for cases of ovarian cancer and mostly negative for patients with benign disease. It is hoped that if the tests work for participants with symptoms of the disease that these tests will also work when testing women who have no symptoms. A new study would be needed to see if the tests worked in this situation. If the tests work, this could lead to increasing the number of cases detected in early stage disease and decreasing the number of cases detected in late stage disease. If this change in late stage is large, it will likely reduce deaths due to ovarian cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2028
September 16, 2025
September 1, 2025
7.4 years
February 19, 2021
September 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Genomic biomarkers assessing mutations and methylation of tumor DNA, and protein biomarkers measured as the concentration of a protein in pg/mL, both types of biomarkers measured in the collected biospecimens.
Biomarkers that distinguish between ovarian cancer and benign ovarian disease
From enrollment through to pathology results post-surgery (usually same day)
Study Arms (2)
Pelvic Mass Cohort (cohort #1)
200 participants scheduled for surgery for suspected ovarian cancer due to a pelvic mass but without a confirmed tissue or cytology diagnosis.
BRCA1/2 Carriers Cohort (cohort #2)
50 participants with an inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 deleterious mutation without suspected ovarian cancers who are scheduled for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to remove ovaries and fallopian tubes.
Interventions
Uterine lavage is performed during surgery using a flexible, 3-way balloon tipped catheter. The catheter is inserted through the cervix, the balloon expanded and the uterine cavity lavaged using 10 cc of sterile saline which is collected, processed and stored for later analysis.
Participants undergo two blood draws (one required, one optional) up to 31 days before surgery
Participants undergo a standard Papanicolaou smear to collect cells and fluid from the cervix.
Eligibility Criteria
Cohorts will be selected from patients scheduled for ovarian disorder-related surgeries across six sites: Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts; Luminis Health System in Annapolis, Maryland; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland; Kaiser Permanente - San Francisco in San Francisco, California; the Swedish Medical Center in Seattle, Washington; and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, Arkansas.
You may qualify if:
- Has intact uterus (no history of uterine ablation, tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy)
- Cohort 1 (n=200 participants): Women scheduled for surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected but undiagnosed ovarian/fallopian tube cancer
- Cohort 2 (n=50 participants): Known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carrier scheduled for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Current tissue or cytology diagnostic procedure positive for ovary cancer or any cancer
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Age less than 30 years
- Inability to obtain the minimum amount of blood
- Inability to obtain the minimum amount of uterine lavage sample
- At risk if blood were drawn (e.g. hemophilia, serious anemia- Hb less than 8.0 gm/dL)
- Prior history of known ovarian or endometrial cancer
- Treatment less than 1 year (excluding hormonal therapy) for cancer that spread beyond its origin
- History of untreated high-grade cervical dysplasia (CIN3)
- History of treated high grade cervical dysplasia (CIN3) with a cytologically abnormal pap smear within the past year. If there is no post treatment Pap smear in the medical record, perform a Pap smear prior to the day of surgery. If this Pap smear is abnormal, the participant is ineligible.
- Currently pregnant
- Known Lynch syndrome
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Massachusetts General Hospitallead
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Centercollaborator
- Anne Arundel Health System Research Institutecollaborator
- University of Arkansascollaborator
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- Kaiser Permanentecollaborator
- McGill Universitycollaborator
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centercollaborator
- Swedish Medical Centercollaborator
- Early Detection Research Networkcollaborator
Study Sites (6)
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
Kaiser Permanente - San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94115, United States
Anne Arundel Health System
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401, United States
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
The Swedish Hospital
Seattle, Washington, 98122, United States
Related Publications (14)
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PMID: 26742998BACKGROUNDJacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Kalsi JK, Amso NN, Apostolidou S, Benjamin E, Cruickshank D, Crump DN, Davies SK, Dawnay A, Dobbs S, Fletcher G, Ford J, Godfrey K, Gunu R, Habib M, Hallett R, Herod J, Jenkins H, Karpinskyj C, Leeson S, Lewis SJ, Liston WR, Lopes A, Mould T, Murdoch J, Oram D, Rabideau DJ, Reynolds K, Scott I, Seif MW, Sharma A, Singh N, Taylor J, Warburton F, Widschwendter M, Williamson K, Woolas R, Fallowfield L, McGuire AJ, Campbell S, Parmar M, Skates SJ. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):945-956. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01224-6. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
PMID: 26707054BACKGROUNDSkates SJ. Ovarian cancer screening: development of the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA) and ROCA screening trials. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 May;22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S24-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318256488a.
PMID: 22543916BACKGROUNDSkates SJ, Greene MH, Buys SS, Mai PL, Brown P, Piedmonte M, Rodriguez G, Schorge JO, Sherman M, Daly MB, Rutherford T, Brewster WR, O'Malley DM, Partridge E, Boggess J, Drescher CW, Isaacs C, Berchuck A, Domchek S, Davidson SA, Edwards R, Elg SA, Wakeley K, Phillips KA, Armstrong D, Horowitz I, Fabian CJ, Walker J, Sluss PM, Welch W, Minasian L, Horick NK, Kasten CH, Nayfield S, Alberts D, Finkelstein DM, Lu KH. Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm with Frequent CA125 Testing in Women at Increased Familial Risk - Combined Results from Two Screening Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3628-3637. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2750. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
PMID: 28143870BACKGROUNDRosenthal AN, Fraser LSM, Philpott S, Manchanda R, Burnell M, Badman P, Hadwin R, Rizzuto I, Benjamin E, Singh N, Evans DG, Eccles DM, Ryan A, Liston R, Dawnay A, Ford J, Gunu R, Mackay J, Skates SJ, Menon U, Jacobs IJ; United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study collaborators. Evidence of Stage Shift in Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer During Phase II of the United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1411-1420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9330. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
PMID: 28240969BACKGROUNDMaritschnegg E, Wang Y, Pecha N, Horvat R, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Heitz F, Sehouli J, Kinde I, Diaz LA Jr, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Speiser P, Zeillinger R. Lavage of the Uterine Cavity for Molecular Detection of Mullerian Duct Carcinomas: A Proof-of-Concept Study. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 20;33(36):4293-300. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.3083. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
PMID: 26552420BACKGROUNDKrimmel JD, Schmitt MW, Harrell MI, Agnew KJ, Kennedy SR, Emond MJ, Loeb LA, Swisher EM, Risques RA. Ultra-deep sequencing detects ovarian cancer cells in peritoneal fluid and reveals somatic TP53 mutations in noncancerous tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):6005-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601311113. Epub 2016 May 5.
PMID: 27152024BACKGROUNDRisques RA, Kennedy SR. Aging and the rise of somatic cancer-associated mutations in normal tissues. PLoS Genet. 2018 Jan 4;14(1):e1007108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007108. eCollection 2018 Jan.
PMID: 29300727BACKGROUNDGilbert L, Basso O, Sampalis J, Karp I, Martins C, Feng J, Piedimonte S, Quintal L, Ramanakumar AV, Takefman J, Grigorie MS, Artho G, Krishnamurthy S; DOvE Study Group. Assessment of symptomatic women for early diagnosis of ovarian cancer: results from the prospective DOvE pilot project. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):285-91. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70333-3. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
PMID: 22257524BACKGROUNDCancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature. 2011 Jun 29;474(7353):609-15. doi: 10.1038/nature10166.
PMID: 21720365BACKGROUNDKinde I, Bettegowda C, Wang Y, Wu J, Agrawal N, Shih IeM, Kurman R, Dao F, Levine DA, Giuntoli R, Roden R, Eshleman JR, Carvalho JP, Marie SK, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Diaz LA Jr. Evaluation of DNA from the Papanicolaou test to detect ovarian and endometrial cancers. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jan 9;5(167):167ra4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004952.
PMID: 23303603BACKGROUNDPepe MS "The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction". Oxford University Press (2003)
BACKGROUNDGilbert L, Revil T, Meunier C, Jardon K, Zeng X, Martins C, Arseneau J, Fu L, North K, Schiavi A, Ehrensperger E, Artho G, Lee T, Morris D, Ragoussis J. The empress of subterfuge: cancer of the fallopian tube presenting with malapropism. Lancet. 2017 Sep 2;390(10098):1003-1004. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31586-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 28872014BACKGROUNDGreenwood A, Woodruff ER, Nguyen C, Piper C, Clauset A, Brubaker LW, Behbakht K, Bitler BG. Early Ovarian Cancer Detection in the Age of Fallopian Tube Precursors: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar 1;143(3):e63-e77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005496. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
PMID: 38176019DERIVED
Biospecimen
* Serum (red-top tubes) * EDTA plasma (purple-top tubes) * Uterine Lavage supernatant (conical tube) * Uterine Lavage filter (conical tube) * Uterine Lavage cell pellet (conical tube) * Buffy coat (purple-top tubes) * Tissue sections
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Christos Patriotis, PhD
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2021
First Posted
March 12, 2021
Study Start
April 13, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2028
Last Updated
September 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data is not anticipated to be shared.