Evaluation of the Utility of Preanestes@s, a Web Based Application for Preoperative Assessment
Preanestes@s
Preanestes@s Phase 2. Evaluation of the Utility of a Web Based Application for Preoperative Care: Comparison of the Rate of Suboptimal Web-Based Assessments Versus the Outpatient Visit
1 other identifier
interventional
2,254
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this prospective two-arm study, the investigators will evaluate the incidence of suboptimal preoperative assessments when the participants are evaluated through a web based application (Preanestes@s) versus the traditional outpatient interview.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 12, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedApril 3, 2024
April 1, 2024
4.2 years
March 4, 2021
April 2, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Suboptimal preoperative assessments (SOPA).
Dichotomous (present/absent) composite variable comprising all possible causes of a predefined suboptimal result. Presence of any of the following: 1. Lack of relevant information in the preoperative assessment that conducts to: * Inadequate conciliation of chronic medication * Inadequate preoperative fasting * Inadequate register of clinical or functional conditions that may cause delayed intervention the day of surgery (presence of uncontrolled chronic diseases, presence of impaired functional status undetected in the preoperative assessment, etc) 2. Lack of complementary tests indicated according to preoperative protocol 3. Presence of not indicated complementary tests according to preoperative protocol 4. Lack of properly filled informed consent 5. Cancellation of the intervention due to inadequate preoperative preparation (attributable to mismanagement of preoperative information-and analyzed by an expert´s committee )
From the day of intervention up to 7 days after intervention
Study Arms (2)
Web based assessment
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be leaded through preoperative period on a web based application. Participants will be addressed to either virtual or traditional face to face outpatient consultation on the basis of the information registered in the web based preoperative questionnaire that the application incorporates. Virtual assessment will be the performed by evaluating both the filled web based questionnaire together with participants´ electronic records. Face to face assessment will be performed in the traditional way by means of an interview with the participant together with the consultation of participant´s previous electronic records.
Traditional face to face assessment
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will be leaded through preoperative period following traditional institutional standards of care. Face to face assessment will be performed in the traditional way by means of an interview with the participant together with the consultation of participant´s previous electronic records.
Interventions
Preoperative assessment conducted through a web based application
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants undergoing day surgery in our institution: Hospital Duques del Infantado, from Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
- surgical specialities included: ENT, general surgery, orthopedics
You may not qualify if:
- Urgent procedures, patients without the ability to understand informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
Seville, 41013, Spain
Related Publications (8)
De Hert S, Staender S, Fritsch G, Hinkelbein J, Afshari A, Bettelli G, Bock M, Chew MS, Coburn M, De Robertis E, Drinhaus H, Feldheiser A, Geldner G, Lahner D, Macas A, Neuhaus C, Rauch S, Santos-Ampuero MA, Solca M, Tanha N, Traskaite V, Wagner G, Wappler F. Pre-operative evaluation of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: Updated guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Jun;35(6):407-465. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000817.
PMID: 29708905BACKGROUNDPajuelo-Gallego A. Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía. Bloque Quirúrgico: proceso de soporte. 2004. https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/organismos/saludyfamilias/areas/calidad-investigacion-conocimiento/gestion-conocimiento/paginas/pai-bloque-quirurgico.html
BACKGROUNDZaballos M, Lopez-Alvarez S, Argente P, Lopez A; Grupo de Trabajo de Pruebas Preoperatorias. Preoperative tests recommendations in adult patients for ambulatory surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2015 Jan;62(1):29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Aug 18. English, Spanish.
PMID: 25146773BACKGROUNDBlanco Vargas D, Faura Messa A, Izquierdo Tugas E, Santa-Olalla Bergua M, Noguera Sopena MM, Manoso Noriego M. [Online versus non-standard face to face preoperative assessment: cost effectiveness]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Aug-Sep;59(7):350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.05.039. Epub 2012 Jul 10. Spanish.
PMID: 22784647BACKGROUNDGoodhart IM, Andrzejowski JC, Jones GL, Berthoud M, Dennis A, Mills GH, Radley SC. Patient-completed, preoperative web-based anaesthetic assessment questionnaire (electronic Personal Assessment Questionnaire PreOperative): Development and validation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Apr;34(4):221-228. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000545.
PMID: 27798453BACKGROUNDNational Guideline Centre (UK). Preoperative Tests (Update): Routine Preoperative Tests for Elective Surgery. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2016 Apr. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK355755/
PMID: 27077168BACKGROUNDLozada MJ, Nguyen JT, Abouleish A, Prough D, Przkora R. Patient preference for the pre-anesthesia evaluation: Telephone versus in-office assessment. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Jun;31:145-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.040. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
PMID: 27185698BACKGROUNDKinley H, Czoski-Murray C, George S, McCabe C, Primrose J, Reilly C, Wood R, Nicolson P, Healy C, Read S, Norman J, Janke E, Alhameed H, Fernandes N, Thomas E. Effectiveness of appropriately trained nurses in preoperative assessment: randomised controlled equivalence/non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7376.1323.
PMID: 12468478BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Manuel de la Matta, MD
Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2021
First Posted
March 9, 2021
Study Start
April 12, 2021
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
April 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share