A Comparison of the Accuracy of Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas
1 other identifier
observational
172
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the accuracy of the Abulafia-Koch, the Barrett, the Barrett Post ,the EVO , the new Holladay with total surgical-induced astigmatism, the Kane and and the Næser-Savini toric intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas using a large database of toric IOL refractive outcomes
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2021
CompletedMarch 1, 2021
February 1, 2021
4.9 years
November 30, 2020
February 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A Comparison of the Accuracy of Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas
percentage of eyes with a prediction error within ±0.50 diopter (D)
5 years
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
group 1 includes patients who axial length(AL)\<26mm
Group 2
group 2 includes patients who axial length(AL)≥26mm
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who underwent cataract surgery at Eye hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,with insertion of the Alcon SN6AT(2-9) IOL(Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, TX)
You may qualify if:
- uncomplicated cataract surgery with a temporal clear corneal incision,with preoperative biometry using either the IOLMaster 500 (softwareversions 5.5 and 7.7) or 700 (software version 1.50; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)
- subjective manifest refraction performed by any of the orthoptists in the practice and measurement of the actual postoperative axis of the IOL alignment performed in the same visit an average of 1 or 3months after surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- any corneal disease (keratoconus, other ectasia, pterygium, or previous trauma);
- previous ophthalmic operations, including laser vision correction, vitrectomy, pterygium surgery, penetrating glaucoma surgery, or scleral buckling procedures
- intraoperative or postoperative complications
- postoperative corrected distance visual acuity worse than 6/9
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Unknown Facility
Zhejiang, China
Related Publications (2)
Abulafia A, Koch DD, Wang L, Hill WE, Assia EI, Franchina M, Barrett GD. New regression formula for toric intraocular lens calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 May;42(5):663-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.02.038.
PMID: 27255241BACKGROUNDKane JX, Connell B. A Comparison of the Accuracy of 6 Modern Toric Intraocular Lens Formulas. Ophthalmology. 2020 Nov;127(11):1472-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.04.039. Epub 2020 May 1.
PMID: 32371252RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Vice president of Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2020
First Posted
March 1, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
January 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02