VERION Versus Conventional, Manual Ink-marking in Toric IOL Implantation
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
OVERVIEW Cataract is a clouding of the crystalline lens which causes vision loss and blindness if untreated. Cataract surgery is the most frequently performed surgical intervention in medicine with an incidence of 880 surgeries per 100.000 population in 2010 amounting to a total number of over 160.000 surgeries per year in the Netherlands. Approximately 22% of patients with cataract have a substantial pre-existing corneal astigmatism. Toric IOLs provide the opportunity to correct pre-existing astigmatism, offering the patients optimum distance vision without the use of spectacles or contact lenses. Toric IOLs are increasingly used in cataract and refractive surgery. Since the introduction of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in the treatment of cataract in patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism, numerous studies have shown the importance of accurate positioning of the toric IOL to the intended alignment axis. An error of 5º in toric IOL alignment will decrease the anticipated effect by 17% and thus misalignment will decrease the effectiveness of the astigmatism treatment. There are several methods used to align the toric IOL at the intended axis. Most of these use a 3-step ink-marking procedure and are performed manually. Clinical study showed an average error of 5º in toric IOL alignment when using this method. Two new tools that have recently been introduced to the market are the VERION Measurement Module and VERION Digital Marker. Together, these tools provide integrated digital guidance for alignment of toric IOLs and they have the potential to eliminate the error in horizontal axis marking and the alignment axis marking error. This will lead to an improved visual outcome. So far, there are no published studies using the VERION tools for toric IOL alignment in cataract surgery. Therefore, the investigators will perform this randomized control trial. MAIN HYPOTHESIS The investigators hypothesise that cataract surgery with the implantation of a toric IOL, when using the VERION-tools, compared to manual ink-marking, in patients with corneal astigmatism will lead to: \- An increase in accuracy in toric IOL alignment OBJECTIVES Primary Objective: The primary objective of the study is to compare the accuracy in toric IOL alignment when using the VERION-tools for alignment of the toric IOL or the conventional manual ink-marking procedure. Other hypotheses and objectives are available in the detailed description.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 16, 2016
November 1, 2015
8 months
February 19, 2015
March 15, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Average error (in degrees) in toric IOL-axis
at week 13 (after the first surgery, if bilateral surgery was performed).
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of eyes with residual refractive cylinder ≤0.5D
at week 13 (after the first surgery, if bilateral surgery was performed).
Other Outcomes (4)
Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA)
at week 13 (after the first surgery, if bilateral surgery was performed).
Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA)
at week 13 (after the first surgery, if bilateral surgery was performed).
Residual refractive astigmatism
at week 13 (after the first surgery, if bilateral surgery was performed).
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
VERION
EXPERIMENTALIn this group the VERION-tools (Digital Marker) are used for the alignment of the toric IOL
Conventional, manual ink-marking
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the group the conventional manual marking is used for the alignment of the toric IOL
Interventions
The VERION Measurement Module is a diagnostic device which can make high resolution colour reference images of the patient's eye for position reference. The VERION Digital Marker is a medical device that assists the surgeon in planning and performing surgical procedures on the eye. The VERION tools use several reference points on the conjunctiva and limbus, and make an overlay between the preoperative achieved and live-surgery image. During surgery, this device projects the horizontal axis and the estimated placement axis of the toric IOL on the patient's eye, and therefore, the surgeon can accurately place the toric IOL to its preoperatively calculated angle.
Several manually performed methods are used to align the toric IOL at the intended axis. Most of them use a 3-step procedure. First, the horizontal axis of the eye is temporarily marked with ink in a seated position to correct for cyclotorsion when changing into supine position. Three spots on the conjunctiva, close to the edge of the cornea, are applied at 0°, 90° and 180°, which may be done by using a bubblemarker or gravity marker with a calibrated horizontal position. Next, the desired alignment axis for the toric IOL is marked intra-operatively. The last step is to rotate the implanted toric IOL until the IOL markings agree with the alignment marks. After surgery is performed, the ink marks will disappear within a few hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Astigmatism (at least 1.25D)
- Cataract
- Are at least 18 years of age
- Eye eligible to undergo cataract extraction
- Eye eligible for toric IOL implantation
- Bilateral eyes: availability to undergo second eye surgery within 2 weeks of the first eye surgery
- Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures
- Understand and signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Irregular corneal astigmatism or keratoconus
- Extensive age related macular degeneration (atrophic or exudative AMD or numerous soft drusen)
- Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (stage 2)
- Uncontrolled/manifest glaucoma
- Glaucoma related extensive visual field loss
- Extensive diabetic macular disease
- Previous intraocular or corneal surgery of any kind
- Subjects presenting any contraindications to cataract surgery
- Subjects with a recurrent or active ocular or uncontrolled eyelid disease
- Subjects with a history of lens instability (e.g. posterior polar cataract, traumatic cataract) or zonular instability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht, Limburg, 6202 AZ, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Bauer NJ, de Vries NE, Webers CA, Hendrikse F, Nuijts RM. Astigmatism management in cataract surgery with the AcrySof toric intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1483-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.031.
PMID: 18721707BACKGROUNDVisser N, Berendschot TT, Bauer NJ, Jurich J, Kersting O, Nuijts RM. Accuracy of toric intraocular lens implantation in cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Aug;37(8):1394-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.02.024.
PMID: 21782085RESULTVisser N, Berendschot TT, Verbakel F, de Brabander J, Nuijts RM. Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Oct;38(10):1764-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.036.
PMID: 22999600RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rudy Nuijts, MD, PhD
Maastricht University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2015
First Posted
February 25, 2015
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 16, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-11