Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Infusion Versus Thoracic Epidural for Patients With Upper Abdominal Cancer Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Epidural analgesia is considered by many to be the reference standard which has been shown to reduce the intraoperative surgical stress response. However, besides its excellent analgesic effect, there are some disadvantages associated with epidural analgesia. This includes the risk of epidural hematoma/abscess ,failure rates hypotension, urinary retention. Also the need for preoperative placement in awake patients, who seem to dislike and sometimes even refuse. It is contra-indicated in the presence of coagulopathy or local sepsis. ESPB is a faster procedure that carries a lower risk of hypotension, can be used in patients with coagulopathy, easy to perform, and requires less training. So this study is to compare the postoperative analgesic effect of continous bupivacaine infusion via thoracic epidural versus erector spinae catheters following upper abdominal cancer surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 11, 2023
CompletedDecember 18, 2023
December 1, 2023
8 months
February 18, 2021
December 11, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pain intensity measured by 11 points Visual Analogue Scale
to assess pain intensity at rest and during pain-provoking movements (deep breathing, coughing, mobilization) measured by 11 points Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score in which 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the severest pain
immediately postoperative for 48 hours after surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Hemodynamic variable measured by blood pressure in mmHG
immediately postoperative for 48 hours after surgery.
Hemodynamic variable measured by heart rate in beats per minute
immediately postoperative for 48 hours after surgery.
Other Outcomes (1)
total opioid consumption
during first 48 hours postoperatively.
Study Arms (2)
(Group of continous thoracic epidural bupivacaine infusion [CEI])
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup I : An epidural catheter will be inserted via a paramedian approach as close as possible to the surgical procedure via the inter-vertebral space (from T8 to T10) so that the affected dermatomes of the surgical wound would receive the benefits of bupivacaine (sunny-bupivacaine) infusion. Proper placement of the catheter will be verified through an aspiration test and a test dose (2 ml) of lidocaine 2% with adrenaline. At the end of surgery, a 0.2 ml/kg bolus of bupivacaine 0.25% will be administered through the catheter and then an infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at a rate of 0.1 ml/kg/h will be administered immediately postoperative and continued for 48 hours.
(Group of continous bilateral erector spinae bupivacaine infusions[CESI])
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup II : Bilateral erector spinae catheters will be placed at T8 level. Surface anatomy or ultrasound (counting up from the 12th rib) will be used to identify the level of T8 after skin sterilization with the patient on the lateral position. Then a high frequency linear-array ultrasound transducer (Sono Site MW, Bothell, WA, USA) covered in a sterile sleeve will be placed in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation 3 cm lateral to the midline to identify the back muscles: the trapezius above, the rhomboid major in the middle, and the erector-spinae muscle on the bottom, and the transverse Processes with shimmering pleura in between. Next, 2-3 ml of 2% lidocaine will be infiltrated. A catheter will be inserted and secured. The procedure will be repeated on the contralateral side. 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% solution will be injected immediately into each catheter then infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% 0.1 ml/kg/h will be continued for 48 hours.
Interventions
Bilateral erector spinae catheters will be placed at T8 level. an ultrasound transducer will be placed in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation 3 cm lateral to the midline to identify the back muscles and the transverse Processes. Next, 2-3 ml of 2% lidocaine will be infiltrated . A 16-G, 8-cm Tuohy needle will be then introduced medially in the plane of the ultrasound beam and directed towards the transverse process. Once the needle is underneath the anterior fascia of the erector spinae muscle, 10 ml of saline 0.9% will be injected lifting the muscle of the transverse process. A catheter will be inserted into the newly formed space underneath the ES muscle and secured. The procedure will be repeated on the contralateral side. bupivacaine (20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%) solution will be injected immediately into each catheter then infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% 0.1 ml/kg/h will be continued for 48 hours.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients subjected to major upper abdominal cancer surgery.
- The enrolled age will be from 18 years to 70 years
- ASA I-II and NYHA I-II.
You may not qualify if:
- ASA physical status \>II, and NYHA \>II
- Patient refusal
- body mass index \>40 kg/m2
- preoperative opioid consumption
- a local infection at the incision site
- a history of hematological disorders or coagulation abnormality
- previous abdominal surgeries, severe hepatic or renal impairment
- Anomalies of vertebral column.
- Pregnant women
- Hypersensitivity to any of used drugs
- chronic pain
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
South Egypt Cancer Institute
Asyut, 71511, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2021
First Posted
March 1, 2021
Study Start
February 15, 2021
Primary Completion
October 15, 2021
Study Completion
December 11, 2023
Last Updated
December 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12