Erector Spinae Block Versus PECS Block Type II for Breast Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized, controlled prospective study is to compare the analgesic effect of US-guided ESP block versus PECs block in patients undergoing breast surgery for breast cancer in the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. We aim to evaluate the postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption within 24 hours
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 19, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 10, 2021
CompletedNovember 2, 2021
October 1, 2021
12 months
February 18, 2020
October 31, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total morphine consumption for 24 hours post operatively
The primary outcome measure of the study will be total morphine consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
duration of analgesia
24 hours
post operative pain scores using numerical rating scale
24 hours
post operative nausea and vomiting using nausea score
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Erector Spinae block
ACTIVE COMPARATORDone unilaterally with the patient in the prone position about 20 min before induction of general anesthesia. Skin is prepared by 10% povidone iodine. An ultrasound machine with a large bandwidth, multifrequency convex probe (1-8 MHz) will be used for block performance. A 22G, 50-mm, at the T4 level of the spine using an in-plane approach. Probe is placed 2-3 cm laterally to the spine using a sagittal approach. Once the erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes is identified, the needle will be inserted deep into the muscle. The needle will be directed from a cranial to a caudal direction. Following confirmation of the correct position of the needle tip with administration of 0.5-1 ml of local anesthetic, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered for block performance. Distribution of local anesthetic will be observed in both cranial and caudal directions.
PECS type II block
ACTIVE COMPARATORDone unilaterally, patient is put in the supine position with ipsilateral arm abducted and externally rotated with elbow flexed 90 degrees. High frequency probe is put in the ipsilateral clavipectoral triangle between the clavicle medially and above and the shoulder joint laterally. The pectoralis major and minor and the plane between them are identified guided by pulsating thoracoacromial artery or its pectoral branch. Needle is advanced in plane targeting the space where the artery is located, 2ml of normal saline is injected to confirm the location. Then, 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% is injected. Probe is moved laterally and caudally towards the anterior axillary fold parallel to the deltopectoral groove till the serratus muscle slips appear underneath the pec minor attached to the underlying ribs. Targeting the plane between pec minor and serratus at the level of the third rib, 2 ml of normal saline is injected for confirmation of the needle tip then 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%.
Interventions
Patient in the prone position 20 min before induction of general anesthesia. Skin is sterilized by 10% povidone iodine. An US multifrequency convex probe (1-8 MHz) will be used for block. A 22G, 50-mm in length needle will be used and block will be performed at the T4 level of the spine using in-plane approach where a convex probe is placed 2-3 cm lateral to the spine using sagittal approach. Erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes are located and the needle will be inserted deep into the muscle. The needle is directed craniotomy-caudally. Correct position of the needle tip is confirmed with administration of 0.5-1 ml of local anesthetic to monitor spread then 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered for block performance. Distribution of local anesthetic is monitored in both cranial and caudal directions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-II
- Adult patients (\>18 years old)
- Female sex
- Scheduled for breast surgeries at NCI, CU
You may not qualify if:
- Patient's refusal of the study procedures
- Allergy to drugs used in the study
- Patients with chronic pain and chronic use of opioids
- Patients with coagulopathies (INR \> 1.6 or platelets count \< 50,000 cc3)
- Hemodynamically unstable patients (e.g. BP \< 90/60)
- Patients with local or systemic infections concerning intervention sites and septic patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
NCI Egypt
Cairo, 02002, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed Bakir, M.D
NCI Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesia, Intensive care and Pain relief
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2020
First Posted
February 25, 2020
Study Start
March 19, 2020
Primary Completion
March 10, 2021
Study Completion
March 10, 2021
Last Updated
November 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10