Reconstructive Surgical Therapy of Peri-implantitis
1 other identifier
observational
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Various treatment protocols of peri-implantitis involving surgical therapies with open flap debridement procedures, resective or reconstructive modalities have been documented to achieve variable success. Surgical non-reconstructive approaches have been suggested to have limited effectiveness in terms of the resolution of inflammation in the long term. Therefore, much more interest has been intensified regarding the efficacy of biomaterials used in reconstructive approaches. The aim of this study was to investigate the 3-year clinical/radiographic outcomes of reconstructive surgical therapy of peri-implantitis using a bone substitute combined with two different bioresorbable barrier membranes, either collagen membrane (CM) or concentrated growth factor (CGF). A total of 52 patients who had at least one implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis and needed to be scheduled for reconstructive therapy of a peri-implant infrabony defect were included. Peri-implantitis case was defined as increased probing depth (PD) compared to previous examinations with bleeding on probing (BOP) and/or suppuration and radiographic evidence of peri-implant bone loss beyond crestal bone level changes resulting from initial bone remodeling. The patients were randomly assigned to receive a bone substitute filling in combination with either CM or CGF. Intrabony components were filled with a bone substitute (BioOss spongiosa granules; Geistlich, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and covered with a CM (Bio-Guide, Geistlich Biomaterials) or CGF membrane. The plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), BOP, PD, clinical attachment level (CAL), mucosal recession (MR) and radiographic vertical defect depth (VDD) values were evaluated at 1 and 3 years postoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Sep 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 12, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 21, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2021
CompletedMarch 1, 2021
February 1, 2021
5 months
February 21, 2021
February 24, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
mean vertical radiographic defect depth (VDD)
Radiographic vertical defect depth (VDD) was measured between the first bone-to-implant contact and the reference point at the coronal part of the implant body at both mesial and distal aspects of the implants.
Postoperative 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Plaque index
Baseline, postoperative 1 and 3 years
Gingival index
Baseline, postoperative 1 and 3 years
Bleeding on probing (percent [%]) (BOP)
Baseline, postoperative 1 and 3 years
Probing depth (mm) (PD)
Baseline, postoperative 1 and 3 years
Clinical attachment level (mm) (CAL)
Baseline, postoperative 1 and 3 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Concentrated growth factor (CGF) group
Reconstructive surgical therapy of peri-implantitis using a bone substitute combined with CGF
Collagen membrane (CM) group
Reconstructive surgical therapy of peri-implantitis using a bone substitute combined with CM
Interventions
reconstructive surgical treatment of peri-implant bone defects
Eligibility Criteria
Presence of bleeding on probing (BOP) and/or suppuration (SUP) on gentle probing, and a radiographic marginal bone loss (MBL) ≥ 2 mm based on baseline radiographs taken at the time of prosthesis delivery with increased probing depth (PD) compared to previous examinations.
You may qualify if:
- age \> 18 years,
- having at least one implant demonstrating two- or three-wall infrabony defect ≥3 mm, which presented a probing depth of ≥5 mm with BOP and/or suppuration,
- no implant mobility and no evidence of occlusal overload.
You may not qualify if:
- serious systemic diseases, medications or conditions that would contraindicate for periodontal surgery and compromise wound healing,
- a history of taking systemic antibiotic during the past 3 months, and
- placement, and prosthetic loading of implants within the past year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gazi Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry
Ankara, 06490, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (15)
Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, Chen S, Cochran D, Derks J, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Huynh-Ba G, Iacono V, Koo KT, Lambert F, McCauley L, Quirynen M, Renvert S, Salvi GE, Schwarz F, Tarnow D, Tomasi C, Wang HL, Zitzmann N. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.
PMID: 29926491RESULTMercado F, Hamlet S, Ivanovski S. Regenerative surgical therapy for peri-implantitis using deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen, enamel matrix derivative and Doxycycline-A prospective 3-year cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jun;29(6):583-591. doi: 10.1111/clr.13256. Epub 2018 May 16.
PMID: 29767434RESULTLa Monaca G, Pranno N, Annibali S, Cristalli MP, Polimeni A. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of a surgical reconstructive approach in the treatment of peri-implantitis lesions: A 5-year prospective case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29(10):1025-1037. doi: 10.1111/clr.13369. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
PMID: 30267445RESULTTomasi C, Regidor E, Ortiz-Vigon A, Derks J. Efficacy of reconstructive surgical therapy at peri-implantitis-related bone defects. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:340-356. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13070.
PMID: 30667523RESULTPolymeri A, Anssari-Moin D, van der Horst J, Wismeijer D, Laine ML, Loos BG. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis defects with two different xenograft granules: A randomized clinical pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Nov;31(11):1047-1060. doi: 10.1111/clr.13651. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
PMID: 32803798RESULTRenvert S, Roos-Jansaker AM, Persson GR. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis lesions with or without the use of a bone substitute-a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Oct;45(10):1266-1274. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12986. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
PMID: 30003583RESULTRoccuzzo M, Layton DM, Roccuzzo A, Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Clinical outcomes of peri-implantitis treatment and supportive care: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:331-350. doi: 10.1111/clr.13287.
PMID: 30328195RESULTIsehed C, Svenson B, Lundberg P, Holmlund A. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis using enamel matrix derivative, an RCT: 3- and 5-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45(6):744-753. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12894. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
PMID: 29574866RESULTKhoury F, Keeve PL, Ramanauskaite A, Schwarz F, Koo KT, Sculean A, Romanos G. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis - Consensus report of working group 4. Int Dent J. 2019 Sep;69 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):18-22. doi: 10.1111/idj.12505.
PMID: 31478576RESULTRoccuzzo M, Fierravanti L, Pittoni D, Dalmasso P, Roccuzzo A. Implant survival after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis lesions by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen: 10-year results from a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Aug;31(8):768-776. doi: 10.1111/clr.13628. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
PMID: 32559322RESULTMonje A, Pons R, Roccuzzo A, Salvi GE, Nart J. Reconstructive therapy for the management of peri-implantitis via submerged guided bone regeneration: A prospective case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Jun;22(3):342-350. doi: 10.1111/cid.12913. Epub 2020 May 14.
PMID: 32410379RESULTAghazadeh A, Persson RG, Renvert S. Impact of bone defect morphology on the outcome of reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis. Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Jun 17;6(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00219-5.
PMID: 32548733RESULTCarcuac O, Derks J, Abrahamsson I, Wennstrom JL, Petzold M, Berglundh T. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: 3-year results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Dec;44(12):1294-1303. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12813. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
PMID: 28902426RESULTKhouly I, Pardinas-Lopez S, Ruff RR, Strauss FJ. Efficacy of growth factors for the treatment of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jul;24(7):2141-2161. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03240-5. Epub 2020 May 16.
PMID: 32418012RESULTIsler SC, Soysal F, Ceyhanli T, Bakirarar B, Unsal B. Efficacy of concentrated growth factor versus collagen membrane in reconstructive surgical therapy of peri-implantitis: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Aug;26(8):5247-5260. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04493-y. Epub 2022 May 26.
PMID: 35618961DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 21, 2021
First Posted
February 24, 2021
Study Start
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion
February 12, 2021
Study Completion
February 12, 2021
Last Updated
March 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share