Regenerative Potential of Advanced Platelet Rich Fibrin and Bioactive Glass (Perioglas®).
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the regenerative potential of Advanced Platelet Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) and Bioactive Glass (Perioglas®) bone graft in the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Dec 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 4, 2022
CompletedNovember 8, 2022
November 1, 2022
1.2 years
February 9, 2021
November 5, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
probing depth
change in probing pocket depth
baseline, 3 months, 6 months
relative attachment level
change in attachment level
baseline, 3 months, 6 months
radiographic linear bone change
radiographic linear bone change through radiographic grid
change from baseline to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Plaque index site specific
baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Gingival index site specific
baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Study Arms (3)
open flap debridement and filled with A-PRF
SHAM COMPARATORAfter phase 1 therapy, surgical procedure would be carried out in the selected patients under aseptic conditions. Full thickness mucoperiosteal Kirkland flap would be raised on both buccal and lingual sides using periosteal elevator. Pocket lining epithelium would be removed and a thorough debridement and root planing would be done in the intrabony defect by using Gracey curettes and universal curettes. After placement of A-PRF in bony defect site the mucoperiosteal flaps would be sutured for complete soft tissue closure.
open flap debridement and filled with Bioactive glass (Perioglas®)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter phase 1 therapy, surgical procedure would be carried out in the selected patients under aseptic conditions. Full thickness mucoperiosteal Kirkland flap would be raised on both buccal and lingual sides using periosteal elevator. Pocket lining epithelium would be removed and a thorough debridement and root planing would be done in the intrabony defect by using Gracey curettes and universal curettes. After placement of Bioactive glass (Perioglas®) in bony defect site the mucoperiosteal flaps would be sutured for complete soft tissue closure.
with open flap debridement and filled Bioactive glass (Perioglas®) and A-PRF.
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter phase 1 therapy, surgical procedure would be carried out in the selected patients under aseptic conditions. Full thickness mucoperiosteal Kirkland flap would be raised on both buccal and lingual sides using periosteal elevator. Pocket lining epithelium would be removed and a thorough debridement and root planing would be done in the intrabony defect by using Gracey curettes and universal curettes. After placement of Bioactive glass (Perioglas®) along with A-PRF in bony defect site the mucoperiosteal flaps would be sutured for complete soft tissue closure.
Interventions
After phase 1 therapy, surgical procedure would be carried out in the selected patients under aseptic conditions. Full thickness mucoperiosteal Kirkland flap would be raised on both buccal and lingual sides using periosteal elevator. Pocket lining epithelium would be removed and a thorough debridement and root planing would be done in the intrabony defect by using Gracey curettes and universal curettes. After placement of A-PRF in bony defect site the mucoperiosteal flaps would be sutured for complete soft tissue closure.
After phase 1 therapy, surgical procedure would be carried out in the selected patients under aseptic conditions. Full thickness mucoperiosteal Kirkland flap would be raised on both buccal and lingual sides using periosteal elevator. Pocket lining epithelium would be removed and a thorough debridement and root planing would be done in the intrabony defect by using Gracey curettes and universal curettes. After placement of perioglas in bony defect site the mucoperiosteal flaps would be sutured for complete soft tissue closure.
After phase 1 therapy, surgical procedure would be carried out in the selected patients under aseptic conditions. Full thickness mucoperiosteal Kirkland flap would be raised on both buccal and lingual sides using periosteal elevator. Pocket lining epithelium would be removed and a thorough debridement and root planing would be done in the intrabony defect by using Gracey curettes and universal curettes. After placement of perioglas with A-PRF in bony defect site the mucoperiosteal flaps would be sutured for complete soft tissue closure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 25 to 55 years.
- Gender: Both males and females will be included in the study.
- Co-operative and motivated patients committed to oral hygiene.
- Patients exhibiting intrabony defects.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with contraindication to periodontal surgery \& local anesthesia.
- Any systemic disease affecting the bone density and outcome of periodontal therapy.
- Smokers, alcoholics, and patients with other adverse habits.
- Pregnant, nursing and menopausal women.
- Any known allergy/ hypersensitivity to any product used in this study.
- Patients on long-term systemic therapy (antibiotics, anti-inflammatory bisphosphonates, hormonal replacement therapy and any other), taking any drug known to have periodontal implications that may interfere with wound healing.
- Patients taking any anti-platelet and anticoagulant medication.
- Patients who have undergone periodontal treatment within a period of past 1 year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Periodontology, M.M. College of Dental Sciences and Research.
Ambāla, Haryana, 133207, India
Related Publications (2)
Ghanaati S, Booms P, Orlowska A, Kubesch A, Lorenz J, Rutkowski J, Landes C, Sader R, Kirkpatrick C, Choukroun J. Advanced platelet-rich fibrin: a new concept for cell-based tissue engineering by means of inflammatory cells. J Oral Implantol. 2014 Dec;40(6):679-89. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00138.
PMID: 24945603BACKGROUNDMengel R, Schreiber D, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Bioabsorbable membrane and bioactive glass in the treatment of intrabony defects in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis: results of a 5-year clinical and radiological study. J Periodontol. 2006 Oct;77(10):1781-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.060029.
PMID: 17032123BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
surinder sachdeva, M.D.S.
PROFESSOR
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- patient and statistician will be masked about the treatment regimen
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PROFESSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2021
First Posted
February 23, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion
February 18, 2022
Study Completion
March 4, 2022
Last Updated
November 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share