Comparative Study of APRF/CGF Technology in GTR
Comparative Study of Advance Platelet Rich Fibrin/Concentrated Growth Factor Technology in Regenerative Periodontal Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Guided tissue regeneration(GTR) uses membranous materials to shield gingival epithelial cells and connective tissue cells which grow more rapidly, creating an effective closed space and time for periodontal ligament cells with regenerative potential, so that new cementum is formed on the root surface and periodontal ligament fibers are embedded, resulting in regenerative healing. In order to improve the effect of periodontal regeneration therapy, as early as 1990s, scholars began to mix platelet concentrate and bone graft in periodontal regenerative surgery to improve the ability of local bone induction and tissue healing. Studies have shown that platelet concentrate, which is rich in a variety of growth factors in autologous blood, can promote soft tissue and bone tissue healing by acting on tissue healing cells (osteoblasts, epithelial cells, connective tissue cells, etc.). It is closely related to periodontal regeneration; the regenerative component of platelet concentrate, growth factor, and the structure of fibrin network containing growth factor are the key to promote tissue repair and regeneration.Modified platelet-rich fibrin (advanced platelet rich fibrin,APRF) and concentrated growth factor (CGF) are the latest generation of platelet concentrates. A number of studies have shown that APRF and CGF contain more cytokines, have a denser fibrin network, and show stronger ability to promote the migration and proliferation of gingival fibroblasts, suggesting that both of them may have better ability to promote bone tissue healing. At present, the latest generation of platelet concentrate has been widely used in implant surgery, but their clinical effects in periodontal regeneration surgery are still lack of conclusive evidence. there is no report on comparing the clinical effects of the two through randomized clinical controlled trials.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 7, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 7, 2021
January 1, 2021
1.5 years
January 11, 2021
July 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
CAL (clinical attachment level)
The distance from periodontal pocket bottom to CEJ was measured by periodontal probe (mm). Record six sites of each tooth (the mesial, median and distal site of the buccal and tongue surface ).In order to ensure the operability and scientificity of follow-up, it is defined as follows.
Baseline(V0),Change from Baseline at 12 weeks (V1),Change from Baseline at 24 weeks (V2),Change from Baseline at 48 weeks (V3)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
PD(probe depth)
Baseline(V0),Change from Baseline at 12 weeks (V1),Change from Baseline at 24 weeks (V2),Change from Baseline at 48 weeks (V3)
mobility
Baseline(V0),Change from Baseline at 12 weeks (V1),Change from Baseline at 24 weeks (V2),Change from Baseline at 48 weeks (V3)
BOP(bleeding of probe)
Baseline(V0),Change from Baseline at 12 weeks (V1),Change from Baseline at 24 weeks (V2),Change from Baseline at 48 weeks (V3)
RBL(adiographic bone level)
Baseline(V0),Change from Baseline at 24 weeks (V2),Change from Baseline at 48 weeks (V3)
IC
Baseline(V0),Change from Baseline at 24 weeks (V2),Change from Baseline at 48 weeks (V3)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
GTR group
NO INTERVENTIONonly conventional GTR technique was used to treat periodontal bone defect,
APRF+GTR group
ACTIVE COMPARATORGTR technique combined with APRF was used to treat periodontal bone defect
CGF+GTR group
ACTIVE COMPARATORGTR technique combined with CGF was used to treat periodontal bone defect
Interventions
20ml venous blood was collected from the elbow before operation and centrifuged with a special centrifuge. One piece of APRF gel was chopped and mixed with Bio-oss, and the other piece was pressed into a thin film; the mixture of APRF and Bio-oss was filled into the bone defect, covered with a properly trimmed Bio-gide film, and then covered with APRF film
20ml venous blood was collected from the elbow before operation and centrifuged with a special centrifuge. One piece of CGF gel was chopped and mixed with Bio-oss, and the other piece was pressed into a thin film; the mixture of CGF and Bio-oss was filled into the bone defect, covered with a properly trimmed Bio-gide film, and then covered with CGF film
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The age of the patient is 18-80 years old.
- selection of affected teeth: there is still at least one site of periodontal probing depth ((PD) ≥ 5mm) at 6-8 weeks after initial periodontal treatment,and the degree of mobility is less than grade II or II-III degree but without mobility after fixation.Imaging evaluation shows that the tooth has a Intrabony defect which is larger than 3mm, and there is no history of periodontal surgery at this site, and the affected tooth has no obvious symptoms of discomfort.
- The patient has good compliance, good plaque control after basic treatment (bleeding index and plaque index \< 20%). He/She can understand the purpose of the test and is willing to cooperate with surgical treatment and follow-up. He/She voluntarily participates in the trial and signs informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- In the past 6 months, patients who chewed smokeless tobacco, smoked a pipe or cigar once a week, or smoked more than 20 cigarettes per week (1 pack per week);
- Patients took any drug affecting platelet function or had a platelet count less than 200000/mm3 3 months before blood collection.
- Patients have taken antiepileptic drugs, antihistamines, antidepressants, sedatives, sedatives, anti-inflammatory drugs or daily analgesics within 1 month before operation;
- Patients with a history of diabetes or patients with abnormal blood glucose test (fasting blood glucose ≥ 7mmol/L);
- Liver and renal dysfunction (AST, ALT ≥ 1.5 times ULN, creatinine ≥ 1.5 times ULN);
- Patients with severe endocrine and metabolic diseases.
- Those with a history of grade 3 hypertension;
- Those with a history of osteoporosis;
- Those with a history of autoimmune diseases;
- Those with a history of malignant tumor or other serious diseases who are not suitable for surgery or cause observation of tooth loss;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Patients with local anesthetic allergy.
- Clinical or radiological findings showed acute infection, apical lesions, root fractures, severe root deformities, cementum beads, indelible enamel protuberances, untreated caries at the enamel or root boundary, and restoration reaching subgingival and/or below CEJ or marginal incongruity
- All kinds of subjects who can cause artifacts in oral imaging examination, such as: the study teeth and their adjacent teeth are metal dentures and porcelain teeth;
- The affected teeth have root furcation lesions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lei Lihong
Hangzhou, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Researcher B is responsible for including the subjects and assigning the number of the subjects according to the order of treatment. During the operation, researcher B will give the sealed envelope to the surgeon L according to the number, then leave, and will not participate in surgery, measurement and other studies. Researcher C is responsible for measuring various indicators on a regular basis. Until the end of the experiment, C did not know the grouping of the subjects.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2021
First Posted
July 7, 2021
Study Start
August 25, 2020
Primary Completion
March 1, 2022
Study Completion
March 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share