CMR Versus CT in Coronary Artery Disease
CONCORD
Comparison of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography With Fractional Flow Reserve in the Diagnosis of Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
2 other identifiers
observational
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
CONCORD is a prospective observational study evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and computed tomography with fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease, using invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2025
CompletedJuly 1, 2025
June 1, 2025
5.1 years
December 17, 2020
June 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
1. Diagnostic performance of CMR and CT-FFR
Diagnostic accuracy of CMR perfusion imaging (quantitative and qualitative analysis) and CT-FFR to determine the presence/absence of significant coronary artery disease at the subject level when compared with invasive FFR.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
1. Diagnostic performance of CMR and CT-FFR
6 weeks
2. Diagnostic performance of CMR and CT-FFR
6 weeks
3. Diagnostic performance of CMR T1 mapping
6 weeks
4. Diagnostic performance of hybrid imaging
6 weeks
Diagnostic performance of strain assessment
6 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
multi-parametric CMR assessment and CT coronary angiography with FFR assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred for invasive coronary angiography
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged ≥18 years
- Referred for invasive coronary angiography for investigation of chest pain
You may not qualify if:
- Recent acute coronary syndrome (\< 6 months)
- Previous coronary artery bypass grafting
- Severe claustrophobia
- Absolute contraindications to CMR - those with MR conditional or safe devices will be included
- Second-/third-degree atrioventricular block
- Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Moderate-severe asthma
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate \<30 ml/min/1.73m2
- Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or of child-bearing potential( premenopausal women)
- Contraindication to iodinated contrast
- Participation in a research study involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Leicesterlead
- HeartFlow, Inc.collaborator
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)collaborator
- University of Oxfordcollaborator
- University of Glasgowcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Glenfield Hospital
Leicester, Leics, LE3 (QP, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Shergill S, Elshibly M, Parke KS, England R, Wormleighton JV, Das I, Gulsin GS, Hothi SS, Heggie R, Wu O, Kellman P, McIntosh A, McConnachie A, Ladwiniec A, McCann GP, Arnold JR. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus coronary computed tomography angiography with fractional flow reserve for diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease in higher risk patients: rationale and design of CONCORD-A prospective, single-center diagnostic accuracy study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2025 Aug 14;28(1):101939. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101939. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 40818667DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2020
First Posted
February 21, 2021
Study Start
November 5, 2020
Primary Completion
November 30, 2025
Study Completion
November 30, 2025
Last Updated
July 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share