NCT03187639

Brief Summary

To determine whether, in a population of patients presenting to the rapid access chest pain clinic (RACPC), routine FFRct (Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography) as a default test is superior in terms of resource utilisation when compared to routine clinical pathway algorithms recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Typical duration for phase_4 coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 13, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 15, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 4, 2017

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 25, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

December 2, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

June 13, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 24, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Coronary artery diseaseCT coronary angiographyFFRctRapid access chest pain clinicStable chest painResource utilisationQuality of life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Resource utilisation

    To determine whether, in a population of patients presenting to RACPC, routine FFRct as a default test is superior, in terms of resource utilisation, when compared to routine clinical pathway algorithms recommended by NICE.

    9 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Quality of Life

    9 months

  • MACE

    9 months

Study Arms (2)

FFRct default primary investigation

EXPERIMENTAL

All patients undergo FFRct as the default test assuming they have no pre-specified contraindications to CT angiography. The result of the FFRct will be conveyed to the supervising physician within 24 hours and will be used to determine the subsequent management plan.

Diagnostic Test: FFRct

Standard care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All patients will be assessed and managed exactly as they are usually treated by the randomising centre and the RACP using the local algorithms interpreted from the NICE Chest Pain of Recent Onset Guidance.

Diagnostic Test: Standard care

Interventions

FFRctDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

In the test group all patients who are eligible for CTA will undergo CTA as their default test. Those patients with any coronary stenosis of equal or \> 40% data in at least one major epicardial vessel of stentable/graftable diameter will be referred for FFRct. (NB Lesions in distal vessels or vessels of a diameter not suitable for stenting/grafting will not qualify for FFRct if there are no other more significant lesions). In patients in whom FFRct analysis is performed, FFR will be derived for all vessels. The data derived from this test will determine their management strategy. The patients in this arm will not follow the NICE guideline algorithm. Those patients randomised to FFRct with contraindications for CTA will be asked to take part in a trial registry.

FFRct default primary investigation
Standard careDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

All patients in the standard care group will be assessed according to their current conventional pathways that are based upon NICE guidelines for Chest Pain of Recent Onset. The trial will encourage the routine and standard assessment and management of all patients at these sites… (anticipated outcomes include ETT, stress echo, stress MR, nuclear perfusion, CTA, CT calcium, invasive CA, reassurance), in accordance with the local application of the NICE guideline for chest pain of recent onset.

Standard care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged over 18
  • Primary symptom of chest pain
  • No contraindication to CTA
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Atrial fibrillation of new onset or when rate control has been difficult
  • Known bigemini/trigeminy
  • Prior CABG surgery
  • Allergic to contrast
  • Advanced renal impairment
  • Significant valve disease (severe aortic stenosis or regurgitation; severe mitral regurgitation)
  • Life expectancy \<12 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Southampton Clinical Trials Unit

Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hlatky MA, Wilding S, Stuart B, Nicholas Z, Shambrook J, Eminton Z, Fox K, Connolly D, O'Kane P, Hobson A, Chauhan A, Uren N, Mccann GP, Berry C, Carter J, Roobottom C, Mamas M, Rajani R, Ford I, Douglas PS, Curzen N. Randomized comparison of chest pain evaluation with FFRCT or standard care: Factors determining US costs. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2023 Jan-Feb;17(1):52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 24.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: FORECAST is a randomised controlled trial comparing 1400 patients with new onset pain who are assigned to either routine assessment or FFRct assessment (n=700 per group)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2017

First Posted

June 15, 2017

Study Start

December 4, 2017

Primary Completion

June 1, 2020

Study Completion

June 25, 2021

Last Updated

December 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations