Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major Depressive Disorder Patients
ADAM
1 other identifier
interventional
752
1 country
17
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major Depressive Disorder is feasible and effective in involving patients in the decision-making process when initiating pharmacotherapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable depression
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable depression
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2021
CompletedFebruary 21, 2021
February 1, 2021
11 months
January 24, 2021
February 17, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Shared Decision Making_Patient Perspective
The patient version of the Shared Decision Making scale (SDM-Q-9) measures the extent to which patients are involved in the decision-making process from the patient's perspective. It consists of nine items rated on a six-point Likert-type scale from"completely disagree=" to"completely agree=". Adding the score of all the items leads to a raw total between 0 and 45. Multiplying the raw score by 20/9 provides a transformed score ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate a greater extent of SDM.
Immediately after the clinical encounter
Shared Decision Making_Physician Perspective
The physician version of Shared Decision Making scale (SDM-Q-Doc) measures the extent to which patients are involved in the decision-making process from the physician's perspective. It consists of nine items rated on a six-point Likert-type scale from"completely disagree=" to"completely agree=". Adding the score of all the items leads to a raw total between 0 and 45. Multiplying the raw score by 20/9 provided a transformed score ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate a greater extent of SDM.
Immediately after the clinical encounter
Preparation for Decision Making_Patient Perspective
The patient version of the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PDMS) assesses the patient's perception of how the PDA helped them recognize that a decision needs to be made, preparing them to communicate with their practitioner and promote patient involvement in the decision-making process. Higher scores indicate a higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
Immediately after the clinical encounter
Preparation for Decision Making_Physician Perspective
The physician version of the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PDMS) assesses the physician's perception of how the PDA helped patients recognize that a decision needs to be made, preparing them to communicate with their practitioner and promote patient involvement in the decision-making process. Higher scores indicate a higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
Immediately after the clinical encounter
Study Arms (2)
Control Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The "Booklet of Scripts for Doctors" was used in the control arm. This tool was developed and tested to encourage shared decision-making in prescribing antidepressants within the Malaysian context.
The "Booklet of Scripts for Doctors" along with the "Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major depressive disorder patients, ADAM", was used in the intervention arm. The decision aid was developed as per the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) criteria to enhance patient understanding of risks and benefits of different antidepressants available within the Malaysian context.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
- No psychotic symptoms
- Based on psychiatrist's clinical judgement currently in need for antidepressant treatment.
- Functional English literacy and language skills (to use the decision aid and fill out the questionnaires)
- Provides consent
You may not qualify if:
- Psychosis
- Communication barriers (visual impairment, language barrier)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Malayalead
- Ministry of Education, Malaysiacollaborator
Study Sites (17)
Columbia Asia Hospital
Iskandar Puteri, Johor, Malaysia
Hospital Permai
Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
Sultanah Aminah Hospital
Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
KPJ Ampang Puteri Specialist Hospital
Ampang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Dr Seed Specialist Clinic
Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Hospital Pengajar Universiti Putra Malaysia
Serdang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Hospital Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah
Temerluh, Pahang, Malaysia
Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
Hospital Pulau Pinang
George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
Hospital Umum Sarawak
Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
A. H. Lee Specialist Clinic
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah
Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
Hospital Pusrawi
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Klinik Pakar Dr Yeoh & Dr Hazli Mental Health Specialist
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
University of Malaya Medical Centre
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Hospital Putrajaya
Putrajaya, Malaysia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aya Ahmed Abousheishaa
University of Malaya
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ng Chong Guan
University of Malaya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2021
First Posted
February 21, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
October 30, 2020
Study Completion
October 30, 2020
Last Updated
February 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share