Is Real-time CGM Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring in Real Life Study (CORRIDA LIFE)
Comparison of CGM in Non-randomised Real Life Study of Real-time and Intermittently Scanned Systems in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
187
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the investigator's study is to compare real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) and flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in adult patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) in real life practice during 24 weeks of follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 18, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2021
CompletedFebruary 18, 2021
February 1, 2021
1.5 years
February 15, 2021
February 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
Differences between HbA1c values in the Run in period and after 12 month of follow-up and differences of HbA1c between groups.
Up to 13 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Percentage of time in hypoglycemic ranges
Up to 13 months
Percentage of time in target ranges
Up to 13 months
Percentage of time in hyperglycemic ranges
Up to 13 months
Changes in glycemic variability
Up to 13 months
Mean sensor glucose concentration
Up to 13 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
rtCGM
EXPERIMENTALPatients with use of the DEXCOM G5 or G6 system (real time continuous glucose monitoring).
FGM
EXPERIMENTALPatients with use of the FreeStyle Libre Flash system (flash glucose monitoring).
Interventions
rtCGM is used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia.
FGM is used in Type 1 diabetic patients to improve glucose control and to minimize or avoid severe hypoglycaemia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with T1D naive to rt-CGM and FGM
- Type 1 diabetes for \> 1 year
- ≥ 18 years old
- CSII without automatic functions or MDI
You may not qualify if:
- previous rtCGM or FGM use
- treatment with insulin pump with automatic functions
- severe noncompliance
- known severe diabetic retinopathy and/or macular edema
- lactation, pregnancy, or intending to become pregnant during the study
- a condition likely to require MRI
- use of acetaminophen-containing medication
- unwillingness to use the study device for \>70% of time
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
3rd Department of Internal Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University
Prague, Czechia
Related Publications (9)
Haskova A, Radovnicka L, Petruzelkova L, Parkin CG, Grunberger G, Horova E, Navratilova V, Kade O, Matoulek M, Prazny M, Soupal J. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2744-2750. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0112. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
PMID: 32859607BACKGROUNDFullerton B, Jeitler K, Seitz M, Horvath K, Berghold A, Siebenhofer A. Intensive glucose control versus conventional glucose control for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD009122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009122.pub2.
PMID: 24526393BACKGROUNDSoupal J, Petruzelkova L, Flekac M, Pelcl T, Matoulek M, Dankova M, Skrha J, Svacina S, Prazny M. Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities for Type 1 Diabetes, Including Sensor-Augmented Insulin Regimens, in 52 Weeks of Follow-Up: A COMISAIR Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Sep;18(9):532-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0171. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
PMID: 27482825BACKGROUNDSoupal J, Petruzelkova L, Grunberger G, Haskova A, Flekac M, Matoulek M, Mikes O, Pelcl T, Skrha J Jr, Horova E, Skrha J, Parkin CG, Svacina S, Prazny M. Glycemic Outcomes in Adults With T1D Are Impacted More by Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than by Insulin Delivery Method: 3 Years of Follow-Up From the COMISAIR Study. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):37-43. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0888. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
PMID: 31530663BACKGROUNDBeck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Haller S, Kollman C, Kruger D, McGill JB, Polonsky W, Toschi E, Wolpert H, Price D; DIAMOND Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):371-378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975.
PMID: 28118453BACKGROUNDOskarsson P, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Krӧger J, Weitgasser R, Bolinder J. Impact of flash glucose monitoring on hypoglycaemia in adults with type 1 diabetes managed with multiple daily injection therapy: a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the IMPACT randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2018 Mar;61(3):539-550. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4527-5. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
PMID: 29273897BACKGROUNDBolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Kroger J, Weitgasser R. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2254-2263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31535-5. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
PMID: 27634581BACKGROUNDHeinemann L, Freckmann G, Ehrmann D, Faber-Heinemann G, Guerra S, Waldenmaier D, Hermanns N. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1367-1377. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30297-6. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
PMID: 29459019BACKGROUNDRadovnicka L, Haskova A, Do QD, Horova E, Navratilova V, Mikes O, Cihlar D, Parkin CG, Grunberger G, Prazny M, Soupal J. Lower Glycated Hemoglobin with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Than with Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring After 1 Year: The CORRIDA LIFE Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Dec;24(12):859-867. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0152. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
PMID: 36037056DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jan Soupal
Charles University, Prague
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2021
First Posted
February 18, 2021
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
November 30, 2020
Study Completion
September 30, 2021
Last Updated
February 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share