Management for Concomitant Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones.
Single-stage Versus Two-staged Management for Concomitant Gallstones and Common Bile Duct Stones
1 other identifier
interventional
64
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Choledocholithiasis is identified in approximately 3-10 % of patients with cholelithiasis. (1-3) While laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered the treatment of choice in patients with gall bladder stones, there is a debate about the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones, (4) and this has led to a range of therapeutic strategies for the management of concomitant gallstones and CBD stones patients. Two-stage endoscopic management using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common approach, although single-stage management by laparoscopic cholecystectomy with surgical exploration of the CBD is an alternative, with the single-stage approach more common in the open surgery era. Currently, it is unclear whether two-stage management is better than or at least equivalent to the single-stage surgical approach to choledocholithiasis. To address this, we undertook this study to compare these two approaches. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to determine the best technique for the management of patients with concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones, by comparing the success rate, complication rates, and longer-term follow-up outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
September 4, 2024
August 1, 2024
2 years
September 20, 2020
August 30, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical successful rates
The prospective clinical trial aims to determine the best technigue for the management of the patient with concomitant GB and CBD stones by comparing success rate and complication rates
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Two-Stage
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwo-stage approach The treatment process commenced with an intial treatment phase. This will be udertaken Under General anaesthesia and entailed ERCP and endoscopic sphincterectomy
Single stage
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle stage approach Under General anaesthesia a5 trocar method will be used to access the abdominal cavity. Aconventional approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be first udertaken with dissection of calot's triangle. The cystic duct will be pulled laterally to facilitate exposure of the anterior wall of the CBD, and the CBD will be opened longitudinally for a distance of approximately 1 to 1.5 cm using laparoscopic scissors. A5 mm flexible choledoscope will be used to identify the cbd stone which will be removed by flushing with sterile saline, passing a stone basket or electrohydroulic lithotripsy as neccesary to clear the CBD. A T-tube will be inserted into the CBD via the choledochotomy which will be closed by interrupted resorbable sutures before completing the cholecystectomy.
Interventions
Under General anaesthesia cholecystectomy and CBD exploration
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 16 to 70 years; Clinical presentation with biliary colic with or without jaundice; Serum elevation of at least one of the following enzymes: aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin; Radiological findings suggestive of gallstones and concomitant common bile duct stones, with abdominal ultrasound showing possible CBD stones or a dilated CBD \>8 mm in diameter.
- only patients with MRCP evidence of a CBD stone(s) were eligible after meeting all the previous criteria.
You may not qualify if:
- active acute pancreatitis, pregnancy, septic shock, intrahepatic gallstones, malignant pancreatic or biliary tumors, prior sphincterotomy, unfit for anesthesia and surgery, contraindications to MRCP and ERCP, liver cirrhosis, previous history of abdominal surgery (e.g., gastrectomy), and inability to give informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2020
First Posted
February 17, 2021
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share