NCT04758923

Brief Summary

Choledocholithiasis is identified in approximately 3-10 % of patients with cholelithiasis. (1-3) While laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered the treatment of choice in patients with gall bladder stones, there is a debate about the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones, (4) and this has led to a range of therapeutic strategies for the management of concomitant gallstones and CBD stones patients. Two-stage endoscopic management using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common approach, although single-stage management by laparoscopic cholecystectomy with surgical exploration of the CBD is an alternative, with the single-stage approach more common in the open surgery era. Currently, it is unclear whether two-stage management is better than or at least equivalent to the single-stage surgical approach to choledocholithiasis. To address this, we undertook this study to compare these two approaches. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to determine the best technique for the management of patients with concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones, by comparing the success rate, complication rates, and longer-term follow-up outcomes.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
4mo left

Started Sep 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress84%
Sep 2024Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 20, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 17, 2021

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 4, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 20, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 30, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Surgical successful rates

    The prospective clinical trial aims to determine the best technigue for the management of the patient with concomitant GB and CBD stones by comparing success rate and complication rates

    2 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Two-Stage

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Two-stage approach The treatment process commenced with an intial treatment phase. This will be udertaken Under General anaesthesia and entailed ERCP and endoscopic sphincterectomy

Procedure: Cholecystectomy

Single stage

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Single stage approach Under General anaesthesia a5 trocar method will be used to access the abdominal cavity. Aconventional approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be first udertaken with dissection of calot's triangle. The cystic duct will be pulled laterally to facilitate exposure of the anterior wall of the CBD, and the CBD will be opened longitudinally for a distance of approximately 1 to 1.5 cm using laparoscopic scissors. A5 mm flexible choledoscope will be used to identify the cbd stone which will be removed by flushing with sterile saline, passing a stone basket or electrohydroulic lithotripsy as neccesary to clear the CBD. A T-tube will be inserted into the CBD via the choledochotomy which will be closed by interrupted resorbable sutures before completing the cholecystectomy.

Procedure: Cholecystectomy

Interventions

Under General anaesthesia cholecystectomy and CBD exploration

Single stageTwo-Stage

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 16 to 70 years; Clinical presentation with biliary colic with or without jaundice; Serum elevation of at least one of the following enzymes: aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin; Radiological findings suggestive of gallstones and concomitant common bile duct stones, with abdominal ultrasound showing possible CBD stones or a dilated CBD \>8 mm in diameter.
  • only patients with MRCP evidence of a CBD stone(s) were eligible after meeting all the previous criteria.

You may not qualify if:

  • active acute pancreatitis, pregnancy, septic shock, intrahepatic gallstones, malignant pancreatic or biliary tumors, prior sphincterotomy, unfit for anesthesia and surgery, contraindications to MRCP and ERCP, liver cirrhosis, previous history of abdominal surgery (e.g., gastrectomy), and inability to give informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cholecystolithiasis

Interventions

Cholecystectomy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CholelithiasisBiliary Tract DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesGallbladder Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biliary Tract Surgical ProceduresDigestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2020

First Posted

February 17, 2021

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 4, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share