NCT04758299

Brief Summary

To test competing sets of information for consumers on how to interpret hypothetical SARS-CoV-2 home test kit results and whether they report plans to take CDC-recommended actions to protect themselves and others given their test results and two critical aspects of their clinical context: symptoms, recent close exposures. Participants will be randomized to receive either information from the FDA authorized Ellume home test kit (the first kit authorized for over the counter use) for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test (usual care) or a decision science-based design of similar length (intervention).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
360

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2021

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 17, 2021

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 13, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 15, 2021

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 25, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

February 12, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 21, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • choice of action to take with negative test

    choice of actions consistent with CDC-recommendations (eg, isolate or not) for various clinical scenarios (eg, with/without known exposure, with/without symptoms) Which of the following are safe for Jamie to do over the next week about being around others? \[safe, not safe\] 1. Take no additional precautions. 2. Stay at home except to visit close family or friends. Take no additional precautions at home 3. Stay at home except when going to the grocery store. Take no additional precautions at home 4. Stay at home all the time, without exceptions. Take no additional precautions at home. 5. Stay at home all the time, without exceptions and avoid contact with others, including others in the household

    day 1

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Likelihood of COVID-19 infection (qualitative)

    day 1

  • Likelihood of COVID-19 infection (quantitative)

    day 1

  • safe practices

    day 1

  • ease of use of information rating

    day 1

  • usefulness of information rating

    day 1

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • ordering postest probability of infection

    day 1

Study Arms (2)

Standard care

NO INTERVENTION

information from an FDA authorized home test kit for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test

Decision science-based design

EXPERIMENTAL

Information from a decision science-based design (of similar length to the FDA authorized home test kit information) for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test

Other: decision science-based design

Interventions

decision science-based design explaining actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test

Decision science-based design

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must be \>18 years old, communicate in English, reside in the United States.

You may not qualify if:

  • Respondents who complete the survey in under a minute.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Carnegie Mellon University

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Woloshin S, Dewitt B, Krishnamurti T, Fischhoff B. Assessing How Consumers Interpret and Act on Results From At-Home COVID-19 Self-test Kits: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Mar 1;182(3):332-341. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.8075.

Study Officials

  • Barry Dewitt

    Carnegie Mellon University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Steven Woloshin, MD

    Dartmouth College

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Tamar Krishnamurti, PhD

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Baruch Fischhoff, PhD

    Carnegie Mellon University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomized to receive either information from the FDA authorized home test kit for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test (usual care) or a decision science-based design of similar length (intervention). There are 4 groups (clinical scenarios) within each randomized arm (the scenarios are patient with no symptoms and no exposure; no symptoms and exposure; symptoms and no exposure; symptoms and exposure.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Postdoctoral Research Associate

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2021

First Posted

February 17, 2021

Study Start

March 13, 2021

Primary Completion

April 15, 2021

Study Completion

April 30, 2021

Last Updated

May 25, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations