Machine Learning Assisted Differentiation of Low Acuity Patients at Dispatch
MADLAD
1 other identifier
interventional
2,499
1 country
2
Brief Summary
BACKGROUND: At Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) centers, Resource Constrained Situations (RCS) where there are more callers requiring an ambulance than there are available ambulances are common. At the EMD centers in Uppsala and Västmanland, patients experiencing these situations are typically assigned a low-priority response, are often elderly, and have non-specific symptoms. Machine learning techniques offer a promising but largely untested approach to assessing risks among these patients. OBJECTIVES: To establish whether the provision of machine learning-based risk scores improves the ability of dispatchers to identify patients at high risk for deterioration in RCS. DESIGN: Multi-centre, parallel-grouped, randomized, analyst-blinded trial. POPULATION: Adult patients contacting the national emergency line (112), assessed by a dispatch nurse in Uppsala or Västmanland as requiring a low-priority ambulance response, and experiencing an RCS. OUTCOMES: Primary: 1\. Proportion of RCS where the first available ambulance was dispatched to the patient with the highest National Early Warning Score (NEWS) score Secondary:
- Difference in composite risk score consisting of ambulance interventions, emergent transport, hospital admission, intensive care, and mortality between patients receiving immediate vs. delayed ambulance response during RCS.
- Difference in NEWS between patients receiving immediate vs. delayed ambulance response during RCS. INTERVENTION: A machine learning model will estimate the risk associated with each patient involved in the RCS, and propose a patient to receive the available ambulance. In the intervention arm only, the assessment will be displayed in a user interface integrated into the dispatching system. TRIAL SIZE: 1500 RCS each consisting of multiple patients randomized 1:1 to control and intervention arms
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2024
CompletedJanuary 8, 2025
January 1, 2025
3.8 years
February 3, 2021
January 7, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of RCS where the first available ambulance was dispatched to the patient with the highest National Early Warning Score (NEWS).
NEWS is a widely used and well-validated scoring algorithm based on objective patient vital signs, which are not causally dependent on the outcomes used to train the machine learning models investigated in this study. NEWS values will be based on the first set of vital signs obtained by ambulance nurses upon making contact with the patient. NEWS is measured on a 0-21 scale, with higher values corresponding to patients at higher risk for deterioration.
Upon ambulance response (Within 8 hours of dispatch)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Difference in composite outcome measure score between patients with immediate vs. delayed response.
Up to 30 days
Difference in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) between patients with immediate vs. delayed response.
Upon ambulance response (Within 8 hours of dispatch)
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALCalculation of risk assessment score by machine learning algorithm and display of risk assessment information to dispatch nurses. Staff encouraged but not required to comply with suggested ranking.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONAmbulance dispatch per standard of care
Interventions
A machine learning algorithm (Gradient boosting) applied to structured data collected in the Alitis Clinical Decision Support system, patient demographics, and free-text notes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Identification of a resource constrained situation by ambulance director (i.e., 2 or more patients awaiting an ambulance response)
- Assigned priority 2A or 2B (Low-priority ambulance response) by dispatch nurse call-taker
- Valid Swedish personal identification number collected at dispatch
- Age \>= 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Relevant calls received more than 30 minutes apart
- Logistical factors (eg. the patients' geographical locations) affect the ambulance assignment decision
- On scene risk factors (eg. a patient is outdoors and risks hypothermia) or risk mitigators (eg. healthcare staff already on-scene with a patient) affect the ambulance assignment decision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Uppsala University Hospitallead
- Region Västmanlandcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Västmanland hospital Västerås
Västerås, Västmanland County, Sweden
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, Sweden
Related Publications (2)
Spangler D, Hermansson T, Smekal D, Blomberg H. A validation of machine learning-based risk scores in the prehospital setting. PLoS One. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226518. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31834920BACKGROUNDSpangler D, Edmark L, Winblad U, Collden-Benneck J, Borg H, Blomberg H. Using trigger tools to identify triage errors by ambulance dispatch nurses in Sweden: an observational study. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 19;10(3):e035004. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035004.
PMID: 32198303BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hans Blomberg, MD, PhD
Uppsala University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Analyst masked to treatment group allocation in final analysis. Outcomes extracted algorithmically from databases.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2021
First Posted
February 17, 2021
Study Start
February 1, 2021
Primary Completion
November 30, 2024
Study Completion
November 30, 2024
Last Updated
January 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Upon publication
- Access Criteria
- Researchers with ethics board approved research plan
Individual level data available upon reasonable request to authors after publication