NCT04741880

Brief Summary

The use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion in the perioperative period is associated with a reduction in postoperative pain scores, opioid use, incidence of nausea and vomiting, among other favorable outcomes. However, this therapeutic intervention has not yet been adequately evaluated by clinical trials when associated with regional anesthesia. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion during spinal anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine alters the time to regression of sensory block in patients undergoing surgical procedures for the treatment of bone and connective tissue tumor surgeries. This will be a triple-blind randomized trial. The sample size estimated was 66 patients. The study will include all patients who meet the pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria, choose to participate, and agree with the Informed Consent Form. The main anesthetic technique will be spinal anesthesia with 13 mg of isobaric bupivacaine. Patients will be allocated in two groups in a blindly after randomization: Group S (lidocaine 0.75mg.kg-1 in bolus followed by infusion of saline solution) and Group L (lidocaine 1.5 mg.kg-1 followed by continuous infusion of lidocaine solution at 2 mg.kg-1.h-1). The primary outcome will be the time to T12 regression of the sensory block. Will also be evaluated: time to regression of the motor block, most rostral dermatome achieved by the sensory block, time to two-segment regression oh the sensory block, propofol dose in the operating room, postoperative pain score at rest, pain at movement score, quality of recovery, use of opioids in the postoperative period, nausea or vomiting, dizziness, shivering, arrhythmias, hypotension, urinary retention, and length of stay. The records will be assigned to the RedCap database. The data will be extracted without identification of the allocation groups for the R software and the groups will be revealed to the researcher after the end of the statistical analysis to write the summary of the results. The results will be submitted to scientific journals afterward.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 28, 2021

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 17, 2021

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

January 28, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 28, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Spinal AnesthesiaBupivacaineLidocaineRegression of the sensory block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to T12 regression of the sensory block

    Time between the injection of bupivacaine into the subarachnoid space and the regression of sensory block to T12 dermatome (in minutes)

    Period: Day 0 postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Time to motor block regression

    Day 0 postoperative

  • Most rostral dermatome achieved by the sensory block

    Day 0 postoperative

  • Time to two-segment regression of the sensory block

    Day 0 postoperative

  • Propofol dose at the operating room

    Intraoperative

  • Time to the first opioid rescue

    Intraoperative

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Group L (Lidocaine)

EXPERIMENTAL

Lidocaine bolus 1.5 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of lidocaine infusion Lidocaine 2mg.kg-1.h-1

Drug: Lidocaine IV

Group S (saline solution)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Lidocaine bolus 0.75 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of saline infusion Saline solution infusion

Drug: Saline

Interventions

Will be sent to Group L a 10 ml syringe of 2% lidocaine and 200 ml of lidocaine solution at 8mg.ml-1 (80ml of 2% lidocaine associated with 120ml 0.9% sodium chloride) A syringe with 10 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered.

Also known as: Lidocaine
Group L (Lidocaine)
SalineDRUG

Group S will be sent a 10 ml syringe of 1% lidocaine and 200 ml of saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) A syringe with 10 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered.

Also known as: 0.9% sodium chloride
Group S (saline solution)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 85 years-old
  • The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification from I to III
  • To be submitted to:
  • \- Spinal Anesthesia
  • \- For surgeries performed by the Bone and Connective Tissue (TOC) service
  • \- Involving lower limbs and inguinal region requiring sensory block level up to the T12 dermatome (except for larger amputations and bone resections)
  • \- Expected duration of less than 120 minutes
  • \- In supine position
  • That they voluntarily decide to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Coagulation disorder that prevents the execution of the blockade:
  • \- International normalized ratio for prothrombin (INR) time and activity \> 1.5
  • \- Activated partial thromboplastin time ratio (PTTa) \>1.5
  • \- Use of enoxaparin up to 40mg/day less than 12h before the procedure
  • \- Use of enoxaparin above 40mg/day less than 24hours before the procedure
  • \- Use of oral anticoagulant or platelet aggregation inhibitors in a lower interval than recommended for spinal block
  • \- Other coagulation disorders that prevent spinal anesthesia
  • Moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (defined by the presence of left ventricle ejection fraction below 40%)
  • Sinus bradycardia (FC \< 50 beats per minute)
  • Relevant cardiac conduction system disorders (e.g. atrium ventricular block greater than first-degree, Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome)
  • Clinically significant arrhythmia (e.g. atrial fibrillation)
  • Body mass index (BMI) than \> 35 mg.kg-1
  • Previous diagnosis of liver cirrhosis
  • Creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min/1.73m2 estimated by the method of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study group
  • Infection at the site of lumbar puncture
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital de Câncer II, INCA

Rio de Janeiro, 20270212, Brazil

RECRUITING

Related Publications (22)

  • Miller RD. Miller's Anesthesia. 7th ed. Phyladelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2010.

    BACKGROUND
  • Imbelloni LE, Moreira AD, Gaspar FC, Gouveia MA, Cordeiro JA. Assessment of the densities of local anesthetics and their combination with adjuvants: an experimental study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Mar-Apr;59(2):154-65. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942009000200003. English, Portuguese.

    PMID: 19488527BACKGROUND
  • Lui AC, Polis TZ, Cicutti NJ. Densities of cerebrospinal fluid and spinal anaesthetic solutions in surgical patients at body temperature. Can J Anaesth. 1998 Apr;45(4):297-303. doi: 10.1007/BF03012018.

    PMID: 9597201BACKGROUND
  • Beloeil H. Opioid-free anesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;33(3):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

    PMID: 31785720BACKGROUND
  • Blaudszun G, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Tramer MR. Effect of perioperative systemic alpha2 agonists on postoperative morphine consumption and pain intensity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1312-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31825681cb.

    PMID: 22546966BACKGROUND
  • Gelineau AM, King MR, Ladha KS, Burns SM, Houle T, Anderson TA. Intraoperative Esmolol as an Adjunct for Perioperative Opioid and Postoperative Pain Reduction: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):1035-1049. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002469.

    PMID: 29028742BACKGROUND
  • Ng KT, Yap JLL, Izham IN, Teoh WY, Kwok PE, Koh WJ. The effect of intravenous magnesium on postoperative morphine consumption in noncardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Mar;37(3):212-223. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001164.

    PMID: 31977626BACKGROUND
  • Wang X, Lin C, Lan L, Liu J. Perioperative intravenous S-ketamine for acute postoperative pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110071. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110071. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

    PMID: 33007645BACKGROUND
  • Weibel S, Jokinen J, Pace NL, Schnabel A, Hollmann MW, Hahnenkamp K, Eberhart LH, Poepping DM, Afshari A, Kranke P. Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):770-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew101.

    PMID: 27199310BACKGROUND
  • Hermanns H, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P, Brandenburger T, Piegeler T, Werdehausen R. Molecular mechanisms of action of systemic lidocaine in acute and chronic pain: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;123(3):335-349. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

    PMID: 31303268BACKGROUND
  • Dunn LK, Durieux ME. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 2017 Apr;126(4):729-737. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001527. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28114177BACKGROUND
  • Ghimire A, Subedi A, Bhattarai B, Sah BP. The effect of intraoperative lidocaine infusion on opioid consumption and pain after totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01054-2.

    PMID: 32493276BACKGROUND
  • Farag E, Ghobrial M, Sessler DI, Dalton JE, Liu J, Lee JH, Zaky S, Benzel E, Bingaman W, Kurz A. Effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine administration on pain, opioid consumption, and quality of life after complex spine surgery. Anesthesiology. 2013 Oct;119(4):932-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318297d4a5.

    PMID: 23681143BACKGROUND
  • Choi GJ, Kang H, Ahn EJ, Oh JI, Baek CW, Jung YH, Kim JY. Clinical Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Thyroidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. World J Surg. 2016 Dec;40(12):2941-2947. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3619-6.

    PMID: 27379388BACKGROUND
  • Beaussier M, Delbos A, Maurice-Szamburski A, Ecoffey C, Mercadal L. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Drugs. 2018 Aug;78(12):1229-1246. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0955-x.

    PMID: 30117019BACKGROUND
  • Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, Macfie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care; European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN); International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN). Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):259-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23052794BACKGROUND
  • Melloul E, Lassen K, Roulin D, Grass F, Perinel J, Adham M, Wellge EB, Kunzler F, Besselink MG, Asbun H, Scott MJ, Dejong CHC, Vrochides D, Aloia T, Izbicki JR, Demartines N. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019. World J Surg. 2020 Jul;44(7):2056-2084. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w.

    PMID: 32161987BACKGROUND
  • Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KC, Norderval S, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Ramirez J; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care; European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN); International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN). Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):285-305. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23052796BACKGROUND
  • Khezri MB, Rajabi M, Yaghoobi S, Barikani A. Effect of intravenous lignocaine infusion on bispectral index during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: A prospective randomised double-blind study. Indian J Anaesth. 2020 May;64(5):369-374. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_424_19. Epub 2020 May 1.

    PMID: 32724244BACKGROUND
  • Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang YL, Hendriksen S, Kusek JW, Van Lente F; Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):247-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004.

    PMID: 16908915BACKGROUND
  • Park SK, Lee JH, Yoo S, Kim WH, Lim YJ, Bahk JH, Kim JT. Comparison of bupivacaine plus intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine alone for spinal anesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine sedation: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Apr;44(4):459-465. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100084. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

    PMID: 30679336BACKGROUND
  • Verret M, Lauzier F, Zarychanski R, Perron C, Savard X, Pinard AM, Leblanc G, Cossi MJ, Neveu X, Turgeon AF; Canadian Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials (PACT) Group. Perioperative Use of Gabapentinoids for the Management of Postoperative Acute Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2020 Aug;133(2):265-279. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003428.

    PMID: 32667154BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Interventions

LidocaineSodium Chloride

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium Compounds

Study Officials

  • Bruno LC Araujo, MSc, EDAIC

    Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital do Câncer II, Instituto Nacional do Câncer

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Bruno LC Araujo, MSc, EDAIC

CONTACT

Andreia C de Melo, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The investigators appointed for executing the protocol will not have access to the group in which the patient will be allocated. Randomization will be performed by automated system (RedCap) and at the time the investigator assigned for preparing the medication in the central pharmacy of the unit is requested to send the infusion. Only staff in the pharmacy sector will have access to the allocation group. The groups will remain masked even after closing the database and sending the data sheet for statistical analysis by the principal investigator, there will be no identification of the intervention performed in each group (lidocaine versus saline solution). After the end of the analysis, the result will be opened to finish the description of the results and develop the discussion of the findings.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2021

First Posted

February 5, 2021

Study Start

June 17, 2021

Primary Completion

December 1, 2022

Study Completion

December 1, 2023

Last Updated

July 30, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations