NCT04739969

Brief Summary

This study evaluates an accelerated schedule of theta-burst stimulation using a transcranial magnetic stimulation device for treatment-resistant depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled fashion, half the participants will receive accelerated theta-burst stimulation while half will receive sham treatment.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 1, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 5, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 15, 2021

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.5 years

First QC Date

February 1, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

transcranial magnetic stimulationtheta burst

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rates of remission one month after treatment in the Montgomery-Ă…sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score.

    The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), is a ten item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Remission is defined as MADRS ≤10.

    Baseline, 1-month.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Rates of response one month after treatment in the Montgomery-Ă…sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score.

    Baseline, 1-month.

Study Arms (2)

Active TBS-DLPFC

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The active group will receive theta-burst TMS stimulation.

Device: Active TBS-DLPFC

Sham TBS-DLPFC

SHAM COMPARATOR

The sham group will receive sham theta-burst TMS stimulation.

Device: Sham TBS-DLPFC

Interventions

Participants in the active stimulation group will receive intermittent TBS to left DLPFC. The L-DLPFC will be targeted utilizing the Soterix Neural Navigator neuronavigation system. Stimulation intensity will be standardized at 90% of RMT and adjusted to the skull to cortical surface distance (see Nahas 2004). Stimulation will be delivered to the L-DLPFC using a MagPro TMS system (MagVenture, Denmark).

Active TBS-DLPFC

The parameters in the sham arm will be as above with the internal randomization of the device internally switching to sham in a blinded fashion.

Sham TBS-DLPFC

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or Female, between the ages of 22 and 65 at the time of screening.
  • Able to read, understand, and provide written, dated informed consent prior to screening.
  • Proficiency in English sufficient to complete questionnaires / follow instructions during fMRI assessments. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures, including availability for the duration of the study, and to communicate with study personnel about adverse events and other clinically important information.
  • Currently diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and meets criteria for a Major Depressive Episode, according to the criteria defined in the Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5).
  • Medical records confirming a history of moderate to severe treatment-resistance as defined by a score of 7-14 on the Maudsley Staging Method (MSM 3).
  • MADRS score of ≥20 at screening (Visit 1).
  • TMS naive.
  • Access to ongoing psychiatric care before and after completion of the study.
  • Access to clinical rTMS after study completion.
  • Must be on a stable antidepressant therapeutic regimen for 6 weeks prior to study enrollment and agree to continue this regimen throughout the study period.
  • In good general health, as evidenced by medical history.
  • For females of reproductive potential: use of highly effective contraception for at least 1 month prior to screening and agreement to use such a method during study participation.
  • Agreement to adhere to Lifestyle Considerations throughout study duration.
  • Lifestyle Considerations:
  • Abstain from becoming pregnant from the screening visit (Visit 1) until after the final study visit (Visit 13).
  • +3 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • Primary psychiatric condition other than MDD requiring treatment except stable comorbid anxiety disorder
  • History of or current psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder
  • Severe borderline personality disorder.
  • Diagnosis of Intellectual Disability or Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Current moderate or severe substance use disorder or demonstrating signs of acute substance withdrawal
  • Urine screening test positive for illicit substances
  • Active suicidal ideation (defined as an MSSI \> 8) or a suicide attempt (as defined by the C-SSRS) within the past one year
  • Any history of ECT (greater than 8 sessions) without meeting responder criteria
  • Recent (within 4 weeks of any clinical effect) or concurrent use of rapid acting antidepressant agent (i.e., ketamine or a course of ECT)
  • History of significant neurologic disease, including dementia, Parkinson's or Huntington's disease, brain tumor, seizure disorder, subdural hematoma, multiple sclerosis, or history of significant head trauma
  • Untreated or insufficiently treated endocrine disorder.
  • Contraindication to receiving rTMS (e.g., metal in head, history of seizure, known brain lesion)
  • Contraindication to MRI (ferromagnetic metal in their body)
  • Treatment with an investigational drug or other intervention within the study period
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • George MS, Lisanby SH, Avery D, McDonald WM, Durkalski V, Pavlicova M, Anderson B, Nahas Z, Bulow P, Zarkowski P, Holtzheimer PE 3rd, Schwartz T, Sackeim HA. Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: a sham-controlled randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 May;67(5):507-16. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46.

    PMID: 20439832BACKGROUND
  • George MS, Wassermann EM, Williams WA, Callahan A, Ketter TA, Basser P, Hallett M, Post RM. Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves mood in depression. Neuroreport. 1995 Oct 2;6(14):1853-6. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199510020-00008.

    PMID: 8547583BACKGROUND
  • Pascual-Leone A, Rubio B, Pallardo F, Catala MD. Rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in drug-resistant depression. Lancet. 1996 Jul 27;348(9022):233-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)01219-6.

    PMID: 8684201BACKGROUND
  • Chung SW, Hill AT, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB. Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Apr;63:43-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

    PMID: 26850210BACKGROUND
  • Jelic MB, Milanovic SD, Filipovic SR. Differential effects of facilitatory and inhibitory theta burst stimulation of the primary motor cortex on motor learning. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 May;126(5):1016-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

    PMID: 25281475BACKGROUND
  • Chung SW, Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB. Theta-burst stimulation: a new form of TMS treatment for depression? Depress Anxiety. 2015 Mar;32(3):182-92. doi: 10.1002/da.22335. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

    PMID: 25450537BACKGROUND
  • Plewnia C, Pasqualetti P, Grosse S, Schlipf S, Wasserka B, Zwissler B, Fallgatter A. Treatment of major depression with bilateral theta burst stimulation: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Affect Disord. 2014 Mar;156:219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.12.025. Epub 2013 Dec 28.

    PMID: 24411682BACKGROUND
  • Prasser J, Schecklmann M, Poeppl TB, Frank E, Kreuzer PM, Hajak G, Rupprecht R, Landgrebe M, Langguth B. Bilateral prefrontal rTMS and theta burst TMS as an add-on treatment for depression: a randomized placebo controlled trial. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;16(1):57-65. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2014.964768. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

    PMID: 25430687BACKGROUND
  • Daskalakis ZJ. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: when less may be more. Brain. 2014 Jul;137(Pt 7):1860-2. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu123. Epub 2014 May 15. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24833712BACKGROUND
  • Thut G, Pascual-Leone A. A review of combined TMS-EEG studies to characterize lasting effects of repetitive TMS and assess their usefulness in cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Brain Topogr. 2010 Jan;22(4):219-32. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0115-4. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

    PMID: 19862614BACKGROUND
  • Holtzheimer PE 3rd, McDonald WM, Mufti M, Kelley ME, Quinn S, Corso G, Epstein CM. Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Depress Anxiety. 2010 Oct;27(10):960-3. doi: 10.1002/da.20731.

    PMID: 20734360BACKGROUND
  • Fung PK, Robinson PA. Neural field theory of synaptic metaplasticity with applications to theta burst stimulation. J Theor Biol. 2014 Jan 7;340:164-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Sep 21.

    PMID: 24060620BACKGROUND
  • Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1995 Oct;34(4):537-41. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340409.

    PMID: 8524021BACKGROUND
  • Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):253-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0135058100. Epub 2002 Dec 27.

    PMID: 12506194BACKGROUND
  • Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9673-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102. Epub 2005 Jun 23.

    PMID: 15976020BACKGROUND
  • Greicius MD, Supekar K, Menon V, Dougherty RF. Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):72-8. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn059. Epub 2008 Apr 9.

    PMID: 18403396BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • David Spiegel, MD

    Stanford University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2021

First Posted

February 5, 2021

Study Start

June 15, 2021

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

May 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations