NCT04736251

Brief Summary

This is an observational cohort study which will look at the biomarkers from blood and tissue sample for adult patients with hypertrophic scarring due to burns/trauma incident over 12 months from date of recruitment. The study will assess the kinetics of the response to fractionated carbon dioxide laser therapy in hypertrophic scars.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 9, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 27, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 3, 2021

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 8, 2021

Status Verified

November 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

October 27, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 5, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Detect the number of senescent cells and the sub-population of fibroblasts 12 months after the last CO2 laser therapy

    Measuring the proportion of senescent cells and the proportion and sub-population of fibroblasts following treatment to determine positive effect of CO2 laser therapy through histological assessment. In particular, to assess: 1. Changes in the proportion of senescent cells (marker: p16) and types of fibroblasts (αSMA and CD90/Thy1) from baseline at 3 weeks after 1st laser treatment. 2. Changes in the proportion of senescent cells (marker: p16) and types of fibroblasts (αSMA and CD90/Thy1) from baseline at 3 months after 1st laser treatment. 3. Changes in the proportion of senescent cells (marker: p16) and types of fibroblasts (αSMA and CD90/Thy1) from baseline at 6 months after 1st laser treatment. 4. Changes in the protortion of senescent cells (marker: p16) and types of fibroblasts (αSMA and CD90/Thy1) from baseline at 18 months after 1st laser treatment.

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Vancouver Scar Scale

    18 months

  • Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)

    18 months

  • Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP)

    18 months

  • Health status

    18 months

  • Quantify scar colour

    18 months

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patient with hypertrophic scarring as a result of deep dermal or full thickness burns/trauma sustained more than 12 months prior to recruitment.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged ≥ 16years
  • Patient with hypertrophic scarring as a result of deep dermal or full thickness burns/trauma.
  • Trauma or Burn sustained more than 12 months prior to recruitment.
  • Treatment area to be ≥25cm2 confluent scarring with a comparable control scar on limb or trunk

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients under 16 years of age
  • Previous laser therapy treatment to the study site
  • The use of recent (within 6 months) or concurrent invasive scar treatments, including intra-lesional pharmaceuticals, micro needling or other laser modalities (e.g. Pulse-dye.)
  • Known allergy or contraindication to EMLA™ 5% Cream (Lidocaine 2.5% and Prilocaine 2.5%), Dermol 500TM (Benzalkonium Chloride 0.1%; Chlorhexidine Dihydrochloride 0.1%; Liquid Paraffin 2.5%; Isopropyl Myristate 2.5%) or 50:50 ointment (White Soft Paraffin Liquid Paraffin %w/w 50 50.)
  • Patients with Fitzpatrick skin type of 5-6 due to nature of the skin
  • The presence of acute infection at the proposed treatment site
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Patients with poorly controlled Diabetes mellitus HbA1C \>9% or 75mmol/mol within last 3 months)
  • Patients experiencing acute exacerbation of Chronic skin diseases e.g. psoriasis or eczema
  • Immunosuppression (HIV, drugs with immunosuppressive effect)
  • Use of Roaccutane at any time within the last 6 months
  • Autoimmune disorders in active stage (for example: 1. Localised; Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Addison's, Grave's and Crohn's Disease, 2. Systemic; Rheumatoid Arthritis, Multiple Sclerosis, Lups and Scleroderma).
  • Known history of keloid scarring

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

Birmingham, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (22)

  • Gangemi EN, Gregori D, Berchialla P, Zingarelli E, Cairo M, Bollero D, Ganem J, Capocelli R, Cuccuru F, Cassano P, Risso D, Stella M. Epidemiology and risk factors for pathologic scarring after burn wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;10(2):93-102. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.10.2.93.

    PMID: 18347236BACKGROUND
  • Manstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, Tanner H, Anderson RR. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(5):426-38. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20048.

    PMID: 15216537BACKGROUND
  • Zuccaro J, Ziolkowski N, Fish J. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Laser Therapy for Hypertrophic Burn Scars. Clin Plast Surg. 2017 Oct;44(4):767-779. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 10.

    PMID: 28888302BACKGROUND
  • Gauglitz GG, Korting HC, Pavicic T, Ruzicka T, Jeschke MG. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1-2):113-25. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2009.00153. Epub 2010 Oct 5.

    PMID: 20927486BACKGROUND
  • Slemp AE, Kirschner RE. Keloids and scars: a review of keloids and scars, their pathogenesis, risk factors, and management. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006 Aug;18(4):396-402. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000236389.41462.ef.

    PMID: 16914994BACKGROUND
  • Shaw AC, Joshi S, Greenwood H, Panda A, Lord JM. Aging of the innate immune system. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010 Aug;22(4):507-13. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.05.003.

    PMID: 20667703BACKGROUND
  • Gunin AG, Kornilova NK, Petrov VV, Vasil'eva OV. [Age-related changes in the number and proliferation of fibroblasts in the human skin]. Adv Gerontol. 2011;24(1):43-7. Russian.

    PMID: 21809619BACKGROUND
  • Coppe JP, Desprez PY, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:99-118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144.

    PMID: 20078217BACKGROUND
  • Demaria M, Ohtani N, Youssef SA, Rodier F, Toussaint W, Mitchell JR, Laberge RM, Vijg J, Van Steeg H, Dolle ME, Hoeijmakers JH, de Bruin A, Hara E, Campisi J. An essential role for senescent cells in optimal wound healing through secretion of PDGF-AA. Dev Cell. 2014 Dec 22;31(6):722-33. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

    PMID: 25499914BACKGROUND
  • Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.

    PMID: 15253184BACKGROUND
  • Tyack Z, Kimble R, McPhail S, Plaza A, Simons M. Psychometric properties of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile in adults with burn scars. PLoS One. 2017 Sep 13;12(9):e0184452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184452. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28902874BACKGROUND
  • Griffiths C, Guest E, White P, Gaskin E, Rumsey N, Pleat J, Harcourt D. A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Adult Burn Research. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Mar/Apr;38(2):e521-e545. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000474.

    PMID: 27893571BACKGROUND
  • Jones LL, Calvert M, Moiemen N, Deeks JJ, Bishop J, Kinghorn P, Mathers J; PEGASUS team. Outcomes important to burns patients during scar management and how they compare to the concepts captured in burn-specific patient reported outcome measures. Burns. 2017 Dec;43(8):1682-1692. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

    PMID: 29031889BACKGROUND
  • Andrews N, Jones LL, Moiemen N, Calvert M, Kinghorn P, Litchfield I, Bishop J, Deeks JJ, Mathers J; PEGASUS Study Group. Below the surface: Parents' views on the factors that influence treatment adherence in paediatric burn scar management - A qualitative study. Burns. 2018 May;44(3):626-635. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

    PMID: 29031888BACKGROUND
  • Lee KC, Dretzke J, Grover L, Logan A, Moiemen N. A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements. Burns Trauma. 2016 Apr 27;4:14. doi: 10.1186/s41038-016-0036-x. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27574684BACKGROUND
  • Brusselaers N, Pirayesh A, Hoeksema H, Verbelen J, Blot S, Monstrey S. Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools. Burns. 2010 Dec;36(8):1157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 May 21.

    PMID: 20488623BACKGROUND
  • Rothman ML, Beltran P, Cappelleri JC, Lipscomb J, Teschendorf B; Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group. Patient-reported outcomes: conceptual issues. Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10 Suppl 2:S66-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00269.x.

    PMID: 17995476BACKGROUND
  • Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, O'Neill R, Kennedy DL. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10 Suppl 2:S125-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00275.x.

    PMID: 17995471BACKGROUND
  • Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007 Mar;46(Pt 1):1-18. doi: 10.1348/014466506x96931.

    PMID: 17472198BACKGROUND
  • Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.

    PMID: 15189396BACKGROUND
  • Browne RH. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med. 1995 Sep 15;14(17):1933-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780141709.

    PMID: 8532986BACKGROUND
  • Chen YY, Patel KM, Imran R, Hassouna T, Amirize E, Abdulsalam A, Bishop J, Slade A, Ventura M, Yarrow J, Lord JM, Wilson Y, Moiemen NS. SMOOTH protocol: A pilot randomised prospective intra-patient single-blinded observational study for examining the mechanistic basis of ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy in treating hypertrophic scarring. PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0285230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285230. eCollection 2023.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Tissue (skin biopsy) and blood samples (plasma and serum)

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cicatrix

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FibrosisPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Naiem Moiemen, GMC

    University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Minnie Ventura, MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Burns and Plastics Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2020

First Posted

February 3, 2021

Study Start

December 9, 2019

Primary Completion

August 31, 2023

Study Completion

August 31, 2023

Last Updated

November 8, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations