Mechanistic Basis of Ablative Carbon Dioxide Laser in Treating Hypertrophic Scars
SMOOTH
A Prospective Intra-patient Single-blinded Randomised Trial to Examine the Mechanistic Basis of fractiOnal Ablative carbOn Dioxide Laser Therapy in Treating Adult Burns and/or Trauma Patients With Hypertrophic Scarring
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an observational cohort study which will look at the biomarkers from blood and tissue sample for adult patients with hypertrophic scarring due to burns/trauma incident over 12 months from date of recruitment. The study will assess the kinetics of the response to fractionated carbon dioxide laser therapy in hypertrophic scars.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2023
CompletedNovember 8, 2021
November 1, 2021
3.7 years
October 27, 2020
November 5, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Detect the number of senescent cells and the sub-population of fibroblasts 12 months after the last CO2 laser therapy
Measuring the proportion of senescent cells and the proportion and sub-population of fibroblasts following treatment to determine positive effect of CO2 laser therapy through histological assessment. In particular, to assess: 1. Changes in the proportion of senescent cells (marker: p16) and types of fibroblasts (αSMA and CD90/Thy1) from baseline at 3 weeks after 1st laser treatment. 2. Changes in the proportion of senescent cells (marker: p16) and types of fibroblasts (αSMA and CD90/Thy1) from baseline at 3 months after 1st laser treatment. 3. Changes in the proportion of senescent cells (marker: p16) and types of fibroblasts (αSMA and CD90/Thy1) from baseline at 6 months after 1st laser treatment. 4. Changes in the protortion of senescent cells (marker: p16) and types of fibroblasts (αSMA and CD90/Thy1) from baseline at 18 months after 1st laser treatment.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Vancouver Scar Scale
18 months
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
18 months
Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP)
18 months
Health status
18 months
Quantify scar colour
18 months
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patient with hypertrophic scarring as a result of deep dermal or full thickness burns/trauma sustained more than 12 months prior to recruitment.
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged ≥ 16years
- Patient with hypertrophic scarring as a result of deep dermal or full thickness burns/trauma.
- Trauma or Burn sustained more than 12 months prior to recruitment.
- Treatment area to be ≥25cm2 confluent scarring with a comparable control scar on limb or trunk
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under 16 years of age
- Previous laser therapy treatment to the study site
- The use of recent (within 6 months) or concurrent invasive scar treatments, including intra-lesional pharmaceuticals, micro needling or other laser modalities (e.g. Pulse-dye.)
- Known allergy or contraindication to EMLA™ 5% Cream (Lidocaine 2.5% and Prilocaine 2.5%), Dermol 500TM (Benzalkonium Chloride 0.1%; Chlorhexidine Dihydrochloride 0.1%; Liquid Paraffin 2.5%; Isopropyl Myristate 2.5%) or 50:50 ointment (White Soft Paraffin Liquid Paraffin %w/w 50 50.)
- Patients with Fitzpatrick skin type of 5-6 due to nature of the skin
- The presence of acute infection at the proposed treatment site
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Patients with poorly controlled Diabetes mellitus HbA1C \>9% or 75mmol/mol within last 3 months)
- Patients experiencing acute exacerbation of Chronic skin diseases e.g. psoriasis or eczema
- Immunosuppression (HIV, drugs with immunosuppressive effect)
- Use of Roaccutane at any time within the last 6 months
- Autoimmune disorders in active stage (for example: 1. Localised; Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Addison's, Grave's and Crohn's Disease, 2. Systemic; Rheumatoid Arthritis, Multiple Sclerosis, Lups and Scleroderma).
- Known history of keloid scarring
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Naiem Moiemenlead
- The Scar Free Foundation Centre for Conflict Wound Researchcollaborator
- University of Birminghamcollaborator
- Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Related Publications (22)
Gangemi EN, Gregori D, Berchialla P, Zingarelli E, Cairo M, Bollero D, Ganem J, Capocelli R, Cuccuru F, Cassano P, Risso D, Stella M. Epidemiology and risk factors for pathologic scarring after burn wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;10(2):93-102. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.10.2.93.
PMID: 18347236BACKGROUNDManstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, Tanner H, Anderson RR. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(5):426-38. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20048.
PMID: 15216537BACKGROUNDZuccaro J, Ziolkowski N, Fish J. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Laser Therapy for Hypertrophic Burn Scars. Clin Plast Surg. 2017 Oct;44(4):767-779. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
PMID: 28888302BACKGROUNDGauglitz GG, Korting HC, Pavicic T, Ruzicka T, Jeschke MG. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1-2):113-25. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2009.00153. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
PMID: 20927486BACKGROUNDSlemp AE, Kirschner RE. Keloids and scars: a review of keloids and scars, their pathogenesis, risk factors, and management. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006 Aug;18(4):396-402. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000236389.41462.ef.
PMID: 16914994BACKGROUNDShaw AC, Joshi S, Greenwood H, Panda A, Lord JM. Aging of the innate immune system. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010 Aug;22(4):507-13. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.05.003.
PMID: 20667703BACKGROUNDGunin AG, Kornilova NK, Petrov VV, Vasil'eva OV. [Age-related changes in the number and proliferation of fibroblasts in the human skin]. Adv Gerontol. 2011;24(1):43-7. Russian.
PMID: 21809619BACKGROUNDCoppe JP, Desprez PY, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:99-118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144.
PMID: 20078217BACKGROUNDDemaria M, Ohtani N, Youssef SA, Rodier F, Toussaint W, Mitchell JR, Laberge RM, Vijg J, Van Steeg H, Dolle ME, Hoeijmakers JH, de Bruin A, Hara E, Campisi J. An essential role for senescent cells in optimal wound healing through secretion of PDGF-AA. Dev Cell. 2014 Dec 22;31(6):722-33. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
PMID: 25499914BACKGROUNDDraaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.
PMID: 15253184BACKGROUNDTyack Z, Kimble R, McPhail S, Plaza A, Simons M. Psychometric properties of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile in adults with burn scars. PLoS One. 2017 Sep 13;12(9):e0184452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184452. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28902874BACKGROUNDGriffiths C, Guest E, White P, Gaskin E, Rumsey N, Pleat J, Harcourt D. A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Adult Burn Research. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Mar/Apr;38(2):e521-e545. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000474.
PMID: 27893571BACKGROUNDJones LL, Calvert M, Moiemen N, Deeks JJ, Bishop J, Kinghorn P, Mathers J; PEGASUS team. Outcomes important to burns patients during scar management and how they compare to the concepts captured in burn-specific patient reported outcome measures. Burns. 2017 Dec;43(8):1682-1692. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
PMID: 29031889BACKGROUNDAndrews N, Jones LL, Moiemen N, Calvert M, Kinghorn P, Litchfield I, Bishop J, Deeks JJ, Mathers J; PEGASUS Study Group. Below the surface: Parents' views on the factors that influence treatment adherence in paediatric burn scar management - A qualitative study. Burns. 2018 May;44(3):626-635. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
PMID: 29031888BACKGROUNDLee KC, Dretzke J, Grover L, Logan A, Moiemen N. A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements. Burns Trauma. 2016 Apr 27;4:14. doi: 10.1186/s41038-016-0036-x. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27574684BACKGROUNDBrusselaers N, Pirayesh A, Hoeksema H, Verbelen J, Blot S, Monstrey S. Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools. Burns. 2010 Dec;36(8):1157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 May 21.
PMID: 20488623BACKGROUNDRothman ML, Beltran P, Cappelleri JC, Lipscomb J, Teschendorf B; Mayo/FDA Patient-Reported Outcomes Consensus Meeting Group. Patient-reported outcomes: conceptual issues. Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10 Suppl 2:S66-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00269.x.
PMID: 17995476BACKGROUNDPatrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, O'Neill R, Kennedy DL. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007 Nov-Dec;10 Suppl 2:S125-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00275.x.
PMID: 17995471BACKGROUNDPallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007 Mar;46(Pt 1):1-18. doi: 10.1348/014466506x96931.
PMID: 17472198BACKGROUNDLancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.
PMID: 15189396BACKGROUNDBrowne RH. On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med. 1995 Sep 15;14(17):1933-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780141709.
PMID: 8532986BACKGROUNDChen YY, Patel KM, Imran R, Hassouna T, Amirize E, Abdulsalam A, Bishop J, Slade A, Ventura M, Yarrow J, Lord JM, Wilson Y, Moiemen NS. SMOOTH protocol: A pilot randomised prospective intra-patient single-blinded observational study for examining the mechanistic basis of ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy in treating hypertrophic scarring. PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0285230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285230. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37682920DERIVED
Biospecimen
Tissue (skin biopsy) and blood samples (plasma and serum)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Naiem Moiemen, GMC
University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Burns and Plastics Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2020
First Posted
February 3, 2021
Study Start
December 9, 2019
Primary Completion
August 31, 2023
Study Completion
August 31, 2023
Last Updated
November 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share